<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Case Shiller Index Falls 18%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:06:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boston Real Estate Blog : Blog Archive : Friday Real Estate Links</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-189689</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston Real Estate Blog : Blog Archive : Friday Real Estate Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-189689</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh, wait, no it hasn&#8217;t. [The Big Picture via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oh, wait, no it hasn&#8217;t. [The Big Picture via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updated: Case-Shiller 100-Year Chart &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188647</link>
		<dc:creator>Updated: Case-Shiller 100-Year Chart &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188647</guid>
		<description>[...] we discussed why the Case Shiller Index, which fell 18%, was not yet cause for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we discussed why the Case Shiller Index, which fell 18%, was not yet cause for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plantseeds</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188630</link>
		<dc:creator>plantseeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188630</guid>
		<description>way late to the party but DeDude....overracting much?  for every right wingnut there&#039;s a left wingnut to keep the never ending, pointless arguments warm until the next fool grabs the baton, why all the hate? why all the hate?  good luck with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>way late to the party but DeDude&#8230;.overracting much?  for every right wingnut there&#8217;s a left wingnut to keep the never ending, pointless arguments warm until the next fool grabs the baton, why all the hate? why all the hate?  good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188606</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188606</guid>
		<description>@ahab:  Well, maybe the U.S. can continue its dominance then by process of elimination, meaning being the least bad country out there, bad but still better than the rest.  &quot;Better than expected.&quot;  Not something to be gleeful about but it&#039;s better than the alternative, I guess.

@ben22:  Yeah, the good thing about this particular friend is that he&#039;s very smart (is a sports doctor here in the TC), is open to discussions like the one we had about shorting the market, and is very open to changing his mind when presented with a good argument based on facts.  He appreciates a healthy debate and doesn&#039;t run away from talking about things because they&#039;re serious and may be somewhat sobering to think about.  Thanks for the compliments, by the way.  I always enjoy reading your posts.  Yours and other posts here make the TBP a must-visit/read site every day for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ahab:  Well, maybe the U.S. can continue its dominance then by process of elimination, meaning being the least bad country out there, bad but still better than the rest.  &#8220;Better than expected.&#8221;  Not something to be gleeful about but it&#8217;s better than the alternative, I guess.</p>
<p>@ben22:  Yeah, the good thing about this particular friend is that he&#8217;s very smart (is a sports doctor here in the TC), is open to discussions like the one we had about shorting the market, and is very open to changing his mind when presented with a good argument based on facts.  He appreciates a healthy debate and doesn&#8217;t run away from talking about things because they&#8217;re serious and may be somewhat sobering to think about.  Thanks for the compliments, by the way.  I always enjoy reading your posts.  Yours and other posts here make the TBP a must-visit/read site every day for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Schott</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188598</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Schott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188598</guid>
		<description>Walt - 

you are calculating second derivatives on your calculator?

that ain&#039;t no HP35

is  MathCad passe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt &#8211; </p>
<p>you are calculating second derivatives on your calculator?</p>
<p>that ain&#8217;t no HP35</p>
<p>is  MathCad passe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaltFrench</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188581</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltFrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188581</guid>
		<description>Rats; I don&#039;t have enough decimal places on my calculator to calculate the second derivative here. At this rate of declining declines, we will hit a bottom when?... 2020?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rats; I don&#8217;t have enough decimal places on my calculator to calculate the second derivative here. At this rate of declining declines, we will hit a bottom when?&#8230; 2020?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188565</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188565</guid>
		<description>uno:  

Well, what they do, it better be in the next 20 years while they are fit for duty. Maybe there are some Sabines around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uno:  </p>
<p>Well, what they do, it better be in the next 20 years while they are fit for duty. Maybe there are some Sabines around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uno</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188562</link>
		<dc:creator>uno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188562</guid>
		<description>There are other wild cards as regards China.  One of them is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.physorg.com/news158563365.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they have an excess of young males by about 32 million or so &lt;/a&gt;due to sex-choosing (by one means or the other) parents that can only have one child.

Hmmm...what&#039;s a country with growing investments in their military/defense to do with 32 million excess males?  Not a good thing, in any case.

More good info on China by way of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stratfor.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stratfor&lt;/a&gt; for those who are truly interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other wild cards as regards China.  One of them is that <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news158563365.html" rel="nofollow">they have an excess of young males by about 32 million or so </a>due to sex-choosing (by one means or the other) parents that can only have one child.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;what&#8217;s a country with growing investments in their military/defense to do with 32 million excess males?  Not a good thing, in any case.</p>
<p>More good info on China by way of <a href="http://www.stratfor.com" rel="nofollow">Stratfor</a> for those who are truly interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188560</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188560</guid>
		<description>Mike in NOLA

Your reference to demographics re: China is spot on, IMO.  That&#039;s a very key factor that is often (almost always, it seems) overlooked these days when speculating about their future and status as the next economic power.  Their population is aging very rapidly and will reach a tipping point much sooner than many understand.  Due of course to the one child policy.  That&#039;s a huge wild card in the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike in NOLA</p>
<p>Your reference to demographics re: China is spot on, IMO.  That&#8217;s a very key factor that is often (almost always, it seems) overlooked these days when speculating about their future and status as the next economic power.  Their population is aging very rapidly and will reach a tipping point much sooner than many understand.  Due of course to the one child policy.  That&#8217;s a huge wild card in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/case-shiller-index-falls-18/comment-page-4/#comment-188553</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30522#comment-188553</guid>
		<description>Mucho data coming out tomorrow-

Jul 1 8:15 AM ADP Employment Change 
Jul 1 10:00 AM Construction Spending  
Jul 1 10:00 AM ISM Index 
Jul 1 10:00 AM Pending Home Sales
Jul 1 10:30 AM Crude Inventories 
Jul 1 2:00 PM Auto Sales Jun 
Jul 1 2:00 PM Truck Sales 

should be interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mucho data coming out tomorrow-</p>
<p>Jul 1 8:15 AM ADP Employment Change<br />
Jul 1 10:00 AM Construction Spending<br />
Jul 1 10:00 AM ISM Index<br />
Jul 1 10:00 AM Pending Home Sales<br />
Jul 1 10:30 AM Crude Inventories<br />
Jul 1 2:00 PM Auto Sales Jun<br />
Jul 1 2:00 PM Truck Sales </p>
<p>should be interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
