<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Executive Compensation Committees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/executive-compensation-committees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/executive-compensation-committees/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economic analysis &#124; Must Reads Monday, June 15, 2009 - Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/executive-compensation-committees/comment-page-1/#comment-183362</link>
		<dc:creator>Economic analysis &#124; Must Reads Monday, June 15, 2009 - Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28995#comment-183362</guid>
		<description>[...] Executive compensation committees [cartoon] The Big Picture [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Executive compensation committees [cartoon] The Big Picture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/executive-compensation-committees/comment-page-1/#comment-183184</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28995#comment-183184</guid>
		<description>sounds about right. but there isn&#039;t enough groveling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds about right. but there isn&#8217;t enough groveling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/executive-compensation-committees/comment-page-1/#comment-183174</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28995#comment-183174</guid>
		<description>too funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VennData</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/executive-compensation-committees/comment-page-1/#comment-183173</link>
		<dc:creator>VennData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28995#comment-183173</guid>
		<description>In Barron&#039;s famous issue, the original &quot;Are you Rich Yet?&quot; they had four levels of wealth.  The cut off number weren&#039;t picked out of a hat, but had logical reasoning behind.  The logic determining the highest wealth level was &quot;If you could pay yourself anything you wanted... How much would that be?&quot;  Which they answered as &quot;How much do Fortune 500 CEOs pay themselves.&quot;  And that was the number they used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Barron&#8217;s famous issue, the original &#8220;Are you Rich Yet?&#8221; they had four levels of wealth.  The cut off number weren&#8217;t picked out of a hat, but had logical reasoning behind.  The logic determining the highest wealth level was &#8220;If you could pay yourself anything you wanted&#8230; How much would that be?&#8221;  Which they answered as &#8220;How much do Fortune 500 CEOs pay themselves.&#8221;  And that was the number they used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

