<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/comment-page-1/#comment-179524</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/#comment-179524</guid>
		<description>Over the last 10 years, the SPX/Gold ratio has declined steadily from about 5.7 to 1, where it is now.  

I think that, 5 years from now, the ratio will be lower still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last 10 years, the SPX/Gold ratio has declined steadily from about 5.7 to 1, where it is now.  </p>
<p>I think that, 5 years from now, the ratio will be lower still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/comment-page-1/#comment-179385</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/#comment-179385</guid>
		<description>Peter, 

Isn&#039;t it possible the gold has been king because it just didn&#039;t go up as much as many other met commodities?  Instead of saying gold indicates inflation or holds up during bad times we could simply say the reason it went down less is because it went up less.

Gold increased by 300% from 1999-2008, silver rose 430%, platinum 577%, uranium 1744%, oil went up 1300%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it possible the gold has been king because it just didn&#8217;t go up as much as many other met commodities?  Instead of saying gold indicates inflation or holds up during bad times we could simply say the reason it went down less is because it went up less.</p>
<p>Gold increased by 300% from 1999-2008, silver rose 430%, platinum 577%, uranium 1744%, oil went up 1300%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernanke&#8217;s Gold &#171; Roi Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/comment-page-1/#comment-179329</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernanke&#8217;s Gold &#171; Roi Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/#comment-179329</guid>
		<description>[...] Boockvar via Barry’s brings an old quote of Greenspan saying that gold is a good indicator of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Boockvar via Barry’s brings an old quote of Greenspan saying that gold is a good indicator of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insaneclownposse</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/comment-page-1/#comment-179286</link>
		<dc:creator>insaneclownposse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/gold-2/#comment-179286</guid>
		<description>Amen! Let the mania begin..... 

long gold here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen! Let the mania begin&#8230;.. </p>
<p>long gold here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

