<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Fix Financial Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:04:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Links: Ron Paul, Evan Newmark, Fixing CNBC &#38; The Yellow Lobster &#171; The Reformed Broker</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-182852</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Links: Ron Paul, Evan Newmark, Fixing CNBC &#38; The Yellow Lobster &#171; The Reformed Broker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-182852</guid>
		<description>[...] opened up the How to Fix Financial Television debate on The Big Picture earlier this week and his own ideas are worth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opened up the How to Fix Financial Television debate on The Big Picture earlier this week and his own ideas are worth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business &#38; Finance Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixing Financial Television</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-182712</link>
		<dc:creator>Business &#38; Finance Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixing Financial Television</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-182712</guid>
		<description>[...] Ritholtz posted a list today of ideas for fixing financial television. Since my CNBC Boycott post generated some interest (I was interviewed for the fantastic recent CJR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ritholtz posted a list today of ideas for fixing financial television. Since my CNBC Boycott post generated some interest (I was interviewed for the fantastic recent CJR [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princess</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-182200</link>
		<dc:creator>princess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-182200</guid>
		<description>This could happen.
Someone needs to say this over and over, every day. 
Eventually it would be noticed.
Please Barry fix it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could happen.<br />
Someone needs to say this over and over, every day.<br />
Eventually it would be noticed.<br />
Please Barry fix it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ap</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-181779</link>
		<dc:creator>ap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-181779</guid>
		<description>Great suggestions. I am mostly for getting rid of all the partisan garbage - it is really not helpful.

one missing - Hire people who can Read a Balance Sheet or Income Statement! 

So instead of just reading the PR statements of businesses - which are full of mostly lies and vague information - you can actually look at their losses and report on the reality.

Wait maybe that would be too helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great suggestions. I am mostly for getting rid of all the partisan garbage &#8211; it is really not helpful.</p>
<p>one missing &#8211; Hire people who can Read a Balance Sheet or Income Statement! </p>
<p>So instead of just reading the PR statements of businesses &#8211; which are full of mostly lies and vague information &#8211; you can actually look at their losses and report on the reality.</p>
<p>Wait maybe that would be too helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themoose</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-181740</link>
		<dc:creator>themoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-181740</guid>
		<description>This was a very interesting article but doesn&#039;t touch on why financial television is like it is. It is not in GE&#039;s interest (CNBC)  or News Corp (FOX) to have thoughtful financial discussion. This would just make it obvious that the Emperor&#039;s (the CEO&#039;s and most MBA&#039;s) have no clothes. Instead what we get is CEO hero worship, capitalism as a religion, and just plain greed! Upper management must be made out to be brilliant, no matter what financial results their company has, to support salaries that are easily 10 times higher then acceptable. The &quot;journalists&quot;  on these programs are simply lying to support their interest ( a high salary). Most of them are so far gone, they really believe what they are saying. What they all desperately need is to get paid $10 dollars an hour with no benefits to pick up garbage along the highway for an unspecified period of time. The fix is a new news network not owned by greedy, petulant, immature, middle aged, fanatics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very interesting article but doesn&#8217;t touch on why financial television is like it is. It is not in GE&#8217;s interest (CNBC)  or News Corp (FOX) to have thoughtful financial discussion. This would just make it obvious that the Emperor&#8217;s (the CEO&#8217;s and most MBA&#8217;s) have no clothes. Instead what we get is CEO hero worship, capitalism as a religion, and just plain greed! Upper management must be made out to be brilliant, no matter what financial results their company has, to support salaries that are easily 10 times higher then acceptable. The &#8220;journalists&#8221;  on these programs are simply lying to support their interest ( a high salary). Most of them are so far gone, they really believe what they are saying. What they all desperately need is to get paid $10 dollars an hour with no benefits to pick up garbage along the highway for an unspecified period of time. The fix is a new news network not owned by greedy, petulant, immature, middle aged, fanatics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixin&#8217; Some Bubblevision</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-181377</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixin&#8217; Some Bubblevision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-181377</guid>
		<description>[...] always a good idea to not just throw stones, but rather point out ways you would improve it. And he lays some out here. Jeff picks a few faves over at A Dash of Insight, and I&#8217;ll do the same. 1. Stop Yelling. Stop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] always a good idea to not just throw stones, but rather point out ways you would improve it. And he lays some out here. Jeff picks a few faves over at A Dash of Insight, and I&#8217;ll do the same. 1. Stop Yelling. Stop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some_guy_in_a_cube</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-181327</link>
		<dc:creator>some_guy_in_a_cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-181327</guid>
		<description>Give it up BR. You cannot fix what is unfixable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it up BR. You cannot fix what is unfixable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natoK</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-181291</link>
		<dc:creator>natoK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-181291</guid>
		<description>To add,

&quot;Sure, Jim Grant would appear and talk in tongues once in awhile (to Lou’s amusement). And Marty Zweig might mumble some general negativity, but Lou would pass it off with a roll of his eyes and another comment about “bond ghouls”. 

Get John Leisman a subscription to Shadowstats.com.

Some of the people here are just freakin hilarious.

I have to say it again, &quot;Jim Grant would appear and talk in tongues once in awhile (to Lou’s amusement)&quot;.

 I can&#039;t remeber the last time I laughed so hard.  Grant is an uber nerd, but brilliant and I love to read his stuff.  I wa ssure he was a masochist b/c he kept showing up every month only to be berated by LOu.

Those days weren&#039;t as good as they seem now, but they sure were a heck of a lot better than these days.

Great stuff Barry.

Again, BNN is the bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add,</p>
<p>&#8220;Sure, Jim Grant would appear and talk in tongues once in awhile (to Lou’s amusement). And Marty Zweig might mumble some general negativity, but Lou would pass it off with a roll of his eyes and another comment about “bond ghouls”. </p>
<p>Get John Leisman a subscription to Shadowstats.com.</p>
<p>Some of the people here are just freakin hilarious.</p>
<p>I have to say it again, &#8220;Jim Grant would appear and talk in tongues once in awhile (to Lou’s amusement)&#8221;.</p>
<p> I can&#8217;t remeber the last time I laughed so hard.  Grant is an uber nerd, but brilliant and I love to read his stuff.  I wa ssure he was a masochist b/c he kept showing up every month only to be berated by LOu.</p>
<p>Those days weren&#8217;t as good as they seem now, but they sure were a heck of a lot better than these days.</p>
<p>Great stuff Barry.</p>
<p>Again, BNN is the bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natoK</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-181289</link>
		<dc:creator>natoK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-181289</guid>
		<description>Sorry so late to the party here.

Barry, I think you just stole the blueprint for CANADA&#039;s BNN.  I am soooooo glad I live in Canada.  I check CNBC once a day and IO can hardly stand it.  It is the yin to BNN&#039;s Yang.

Everything you can&#039;t stand about  CNBC you find absent on BNN.  2 -3 people discussing an issue, counterpoints in a normal tone, several areas of the markets, diverse guests and issues.  All that plus Manda Lang.

And some of the daytime hosts will remind you of the secretary George Costanza hired.  Let&#039;s just say you won&#039;t forget your own name when you are tuning in!

I love it.  And CNBC, it really is the Jerry Springer of the 2000&#039;s.  All of the hosts are just tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry so late to the party here.</p>
<p>Barry, I think you just stole the blueprint for CANADA&#8217;s BNN.  I am soooooo glad I live in Canada.  I check CNBC once a day and IO can hardly stand it.  It is the yin to BNN&#8217;s Yang.</p>
<p>Everything you can&#8217;t stand about  CNBC you find absent on BNN.  2 -3 people discussing an issue, counterpoints in a normal tone, several areas of the markets, diverse guests and issues.  All that plus Manda Lang.</p>
<p>And some of the daytime hosts will remind you of the secretary George Costanza hired.  Let&#8217;s just say you won&#8217;t forget your own name when you are tuning in!</p>
<p>I love it.  And CNBC, it really is the Jerry Springer of the 2000&#8217;s.  All of the hosts are just tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin66</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/how-to-fix-financial-television/comment-page-3/#comment-181029</link>
		<dc:creator>martin66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28526#comment-181029</guid>
		<description>BR: &quot;really?&quot;

Martin 66 - Yep.  CNBC specifically is just another form of infotainment in the service of another product placement industry.    Do you honestly believe their programming has any real bearing on the economy, public policy, or even investment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR: &#8220;really?&#8221;</p>
<p>Martin 66 &#8211; Yep.  CNBC specifically is just another form of infotainment in the service of another product placement industry.    Do you honestly believe their programming has any real bearing on the economy, public policy, or even investment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
