<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Appearance: Bloomberg Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-181167</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-181167</guid>
		<description>Link to podcast:

http://media.bloomberg.com/bb/avfile/Economics/On_Economy/v3IsyCX4szKI.mp3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link to podcast:</p>
<p><a href="http://media.bloomberg.com/bb/avfile/Economics/On_Economy/v3IsyCX4szKI.mp3" rel="nofollow">http://media.bloomberg.com/bb/avfile/Economics/On_Economy/v3IsyCX4szKI.mp3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180921</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180921</guid>
		<description>He is one of the better financial interviewers around these days. You must rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is one of the better financial interviewers around these days. You must rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Ritholtz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180913</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Ritholtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180913</guid>
		<description>It was just me and Tom for an hour.  (So frickin cool!)

I will post the link when its up on Bloomberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just me and Tom for an hour.  (So frickin cool!)</p>
<p>I will post the link when its up on Bloomberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjdon67</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180900</link>
		<dc:creator>mjdon67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180900</guid>
		<description>I love Tom Keene and his podcasts, all worth listening to.  However, I can&#039;t stand his sidekick Ken Prewitt far too partisian for my taste, too many snide comments, and generally attempts to sell his viewpoint in his questions.

Recent Prewittism.  Tom made a comment on GM and Ken said &quot;oh you mean Government Motors&quot;, but has he once ever made a similar snide remark on the trillions of bailout dollars that have gone to the banks?  Nope, you&#039;ll never hear any reference to the quasi nationalism of the banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Tom Keene and his podcasts, all worth listening to.  However, I can&#8217;t stand his sidekick Ken Prewitt far too partisian for my taste, too many snide comments, and generally attempts to sell his viewpoint in his questions.</p>
<p>Recent Prewittism.  Tom made a comment on GM and Ken said &#8220;oh you mean Government Motors&#8221;, but has he once ever made a similar snide remark on the trillions of bailout dollars that have gone to the banks?  Nope, you&#8217;ll never hear any reference to the quasi nationalism of the banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franklin411</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180867</link>
		<dc:creator>franklin411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180867</guid>
		<description>@cvienne
We&#039;ll see.  I&#039;d prefer that Chrysler remain &quot;all in the family,&quot; but you never know.  Was it BMW that they used to describe as the best of everything?  IE--Italian design, German engineering!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cvienne<br />
We&#8217;ll see.  I&#8217;d prefer that Chrysler remain &#8220;all in the family,&#8221; but you never know.  Was it BMW that they used to describe as the best of everything?  IE&#8211;Italian design, German engineering!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvienne</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180823</link>
		<dc:creator>cvienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180823</guid>
		<description>@Franklin411 (9:18)

&quot;Remember that GM is coming down the pike, so she may want to issue more than a blanket rejection of the case without explanation. She may want to issue a rejection order with a strong, well composed legal justification to prevent a recurrence in the much larger case of GM.&quot;

I&#039;d tend to go along with your observation (vis-a-vis Ginsberg)...

I&#039;ll tell you something though...From an operational standpoint, the deal is all wrong...You don&#039;t want FIAT calling the shots here...I lived in Italy for 12 years...Trust me on this...

It is what it is though...If &#039;expediency&#039; is what was desired, then &#039;expediency&#039; is what will be gotten...I wouldn&#039;t make the mistake of thinking of it as a WIN though...All facets of the operation will be ground into dust within 20 years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Franklin411 (9:18)</p>
<p>&#8220;Remember that GM is coming down the pike, so she may want to issue more than a blanket rejection of the case without explanation. She may want to issue a rejection order with a strong, well composed legal justification to prevent a recurrence in the much larger case of GM.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d tend to go along with your observation (vis-a-vis Ginsberg)&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you something though&#8230;From an operational standpoint, the deal is all wrong&#8230;You don&#8217;t want FIAT calling the shots here&#8230;I lived in Italy for 12 years&#8230;Trust me on this&#8230;</p>
<p>It is what it is though&#8230;If &#8216;expediency&#8217; is what was desired, then &#8216;expediency&#8217; is what will be gotten&#8230;I wouldn&#8217;t make the mistake of thinking of it as a WIN though&#8230;All facets of the operation will be ground into dust within 20 years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franklin411</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180812</link>
		<dc:creator>franklin411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180812</guid>
		<description>@Pool
All it means is exactly what she said: she wants more time to review the matter.  In fact, she only received the people&#039;s response to the case filed by these speculators at 10 AM today. 

Remember that GM is coming down the pike, so she may want to issue more than a blanket rejection of the case without explanation.  She may want to issue a rejection order with a strong, well composed legal justification to prevent a recurrence in the much larger case of GM.

And I highly doubt that anyone on the Supreme Court is ever worried about being seen as &quot;wimpy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pool<br />
All it means is exactly what she said: she wants more time to review the matter.  In fact, she only received the people&#8217;s response to the case filed by these speculators at 10 AM today. </p>
<p>Remember that GM is coming down the pike, so she may want to issue more than a blanket rejection of the case without explanation.  She may want to issue a rejection order with a strong, well composed legal justification to prevent a recurrence in the much larger case of GM.</p>
<p>And I highly doubt that anyone on the Supreme Court is ever worried about being seen as &#8220;wimpy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pool Shark</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180761</link>
		<dc:creator>Pool Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180761</guid>
		<description>Yep, but she needs only three more votes to get cert.

And the question becomes why grant &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; stay unless there is likely to be &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; kind of review on the merits?

Why step in front of a speeding train unless you feel you have the power to stop/derail it. Issuing, and then meekly dropping a stay would be seen (rightly) as a wimp-out by the Supremes; she has to know this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, but she needs only three more votes to get cert.</p>
<p>And the question becomes why grant <i>any</i> stay unless there is likely to be <i>some</i> kind of review on the merits?</p>
<p>Why step in front of a speeding train unless you feel you have the power to stop/derail it. Issuing, and then meekly dropping a stay would be seen (rightly) as a wimp-out by the Supremes; she has to know this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkknight</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180760</link>
		<dc:creator>darkknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180760</guid>
		<description>ere’s the benefit of the B/D adjustment:Obama Officials See Hope in Jobless Numbers
June 7 (Bloomberg) — White House officials said they see encouraging signs in the slowing rate of job losses and defended the Obama administration’s handling of the bankruptcy of General Motors Corp.

The economy lost 345,000 jobs last month, fewer than expected and the lowest number since September, the Department of Labor reported June 5. Unemployment rose to 9.4 percent.

yup..this bull cant be stopped. keep buying the dips. I,m a bear but DONT short this market yet. 

good read, folks &lt;a href=&quot;http://stockmarket55.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interesting finance articles&lt;/a&gt;

could we be in he worst financial crisis in 100 years? Is the next shoe to drop soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ere’s the benefit of the B/D adjustment:Obama Officials See Hope in Jobless Numbers<br />
June 7 (Bloomberg) — White House officials said they see encouraging signs in the slowing rate of job losses and defended the Obama administration’s handling of the bankruptcy of General Motors Corp.</p>
<p>The economy lost 345,000 jobs last month, fewer than expected and the lowest number since September, the Department of Labor reported June 5. Unemployment rose to 9.4 percent.</p>
<p>yup..this bull cant be stopped. keep buying the dips. I,m a bear but DONT short this market yet. </p>
<p>good read, folks <a href="http://stockmarket55.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">interesting finance articles</a></p>
<p>could we be in he worst financial crisis in 100 years? Is the next shoe to drop soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franklin411</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/media-appearance-bloomberg-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-180746</link>
		<dc:creator>franklin411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=28567#comment-180746</guid>
		<description>Relax Pool...it&#039;s a stay, not cert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relax Pool&#8230;it&#8217;s a stay, not cert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

