<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Home Sales Fell 32.8%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186319</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186319</guid>
		<description>drollere

That&#039;s right, it&#039;s all better now.  Nothing to see here.  Happy days, just like in &#039;07.  A rally suddenly makes it all better, just as it always does; until reality sets in again.  But thanks for the lecture, as incoherent as it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drollere</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s all better now.  Nothing to see here.  Happy days, just like in &#8217;07.  A rally suddenly makes it all better, just as it always does; until reality sets in again.  But thanks for the lecture, as incoherent as it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James R. Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186277</link>
		<dc:creator>James R. Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186277</guid>
		<description>

FHFA Data May Signal False Bottom in Housing   
http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/06/23/fhfa-data-may-signal-false-bottom-in-housing/

The latest U.S. home-price data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency may be a false signal that the housing market is bottoming out.

The agency reported Tuesday morning that its price index in April was down 6.8% from a year earlier, but showed a decline of only 0.3% in the first four months of 2009. “We may be starting to see signs of stabilization in prices for houses” funded by mortgages guaranteed by government-backed investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the FHFA said.

Ivy Zelman, chief executive of Zelman &amp; Associates, a research firm, is less sanguine. She says in a new report that the low end of the market “appears to be approaching stabilization given improved affordability for first-time home buyers and the willingness of investors to absorb distressed home sales.” But she expects prices of higher-end homes to fall swiftly in the months ahead as sellers become more desperate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FHFA Data May Signal False Bottom in Housing<br />
<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/06/23/fhfa-data-may-signal-false-bottom-in-housing/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/06/23/fhfa-data-may-signal-false-bottom-in-housing/</a></p>
<p>The latest U.S. home-price data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency may be a false signal that the housing market is bottoming out.</p>
<p>The agency reported Tuesday morning that its price index in April was down 6.8% from a year earlier, but showed a decline of only 0.3% in the first four months of 2009. “We may be starting to see signs of stabilization in prices for houses” funded by mortgages guaranteed by government-backed investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the FHFA said.</p>
<p>Ivy Zelman, chief executive of Zelman &#038; Associates, a research firm, is less sanguine. She says in a new report that the low end of the market “appears to be approaching stabilization given improved affordability for first-time home buyers and the willingness of investors to absorb distressed home sales.” But she expects prices of higher-end homes to fall swiftly in the months ahead as sellers become more desperate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186246</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186246</guid>
		<description>&quot;but the margin of error was ±17.8%.&quot;

An example of &quot;pro-fraud&quot;.  How is such a variance allowed in any specific number?  &quot;New home sales&quot;.  Why is this number apparently, so difficult to derive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but the margin of error was ±17.8%.&#8221;</p>
<p>An example of &#8220;pro-fraud&#8221;.  How is such a variance allowed in any specific number?  &#8220;New home sales&#8221;.  Why is this number apparently, so difficult to derive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novemberrain</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186245</link>
		<dc:creator>Novemberrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186245</guid>
		<description>I think the housing crash is far from being over. 

Job losses have almost reached its peak .Foreclosure rates rise with unemployment levels as many homeowners are affected as they are not able to earn money and pay the home loans. People who want to buy new homes are also refraining from the risk as they are unsure of their employment in the coming months. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.housingnewslive.com/is-the-housing-market-recovering.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Home sales&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the housing crash is far from being over. </p>
<p>Job losses have almost reached its peak .Foreclosure rates rise with unemployment levels as many homeowners are affected as they are not able to earn money and pay the home loans. People who want to buy new homes are also refraining from the risk as they are unsure of their employment in the coming months. <a href="http://www.housingnewslive.com/is-the-housing-market-recovering.php" rel="nofollow">Home sales</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186243</link>
		<dc:creator>GB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186243</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait to get a vacation home cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to get a vacation home cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCF</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186239</link>
		<dc:creator>HCF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186239</guid>
		<description>@ Onlooker From Troy
&gt;almost purely flipping inventory

I love that term!  Housing units being traded like baseball cards or Beany Babies....  If we just flip the same shit back and forth to each other at ever higher we&#039;ll all be rich!  Well, at least until the whole thing collapses... =)

HCF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Onlooker From Troy<br />
&gt;almost purely flipping inventory</p>
<p>I love that term!  Housing units being traded like baseball cards or Beany Babies&#8230;.  If we just flip the same shit back and forth to each other at ever higher we&#8217;ll all be rich!  Well, at least until the whole thing collapses&#8230; =)</p>
<p>HCF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drollere</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186238</link>
		<dc:creator>drollere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186238</guid>
		<description>we&#039;re in a recession and a housing slump as those things are defined in normal times, *and* we&#039;re looking backwards at a historically aberrant tsunami of financial and regulatory delusion. 

ytd numbers have only that story to tell, and no other. 

there seems to be a &quot;things are terrible and they&#039;ll never get better&quot; editorial policy at BP. statistics are chosen, and skewed, to insist on that sermon. (when unemployment figures moderate, shift to &quot;exhaustion rate&quot;.) 

data analysts understand the basic hygiene here. avoid lagged statistics, moving averages, ytd comparisons, difference indexes, ratios of ratios, and all other inflators of noise, measurement error and the dead hand of the moronic past. 

don&#039;t look backwards with regret or chagrin-- unless a return to free money, free wheeling and free recklessness is your terminal pleasure. 

most posters here have been proclaiming for months the ultimate crash, the &quot;rising wedge&quot;, the retribution for sin, the scourge of inflation, the reign of gold. i&#039;ve been pointing out for months that the market is going up and may go upper. those who listened to me have made a nice profit. the others have very tight shorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;re in a recession and a housing slump as those things are defined in normal times, *and* we&#8217;re looking backwards at a historically aberrant tsunami of financial and regulatory delusion. </p>
<p>ytd numbers have only that story to tell, and no other. </p>
<p>there seems to be a &#8220;things are terrible and they&#8217;ll never get better&#8221; editorial policy at BP. statistics are chosen, and skewed, to insist on that sermon. (when unemployment figures moderate, shift to &#8220;exhaustion rate&#8221;.) </p>
<p>data analysts understand the basic hygiene here. avoid lagged statistics, moving averages, ytd comparisons, difference indexes, ratios of ratios, and all other inflators of noise, measurement error and the dead hand of the moronic past. </p>
<p>don&#8217;t look backwards with regret or chagrin&#8211; unless a return to free money, free wheeling and free recklessness is your terminal pleasure. </p>
<p>most posters here have been proclaiming for months the ultimate crash, the &#8220;rising wedge&#8221;, the retribution for sin, the scourge of inflation, the reign of gold. i&#8217;ve been pointing out for months that the market is going up and may go upper. those who listened to me have made a nice profit. the others have very tight shorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNBC Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186236</link>
		<dc:creator>CNBC Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186236</guid>
		<description>Ritholtz is getting cranky lately.  I think Ritholtz ran into Larry Kudlow, Don Luskin, and the little Ewok recently and those three ripped on Barry&#039;s &quot;Libertarian&quot; ideas even as Barack W. Obama was doing everything the GOP wants.

Ritholtz, I think you should go on Kudlow again just for old time&#039;s sake and to stir the summer pot.

By the way, is Don Luskin still alive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ritholtz is getting cranky lately.  I think Ritholtz ran into Larry Kudlow, Don Luskin, and the little Ewok recently and those three ripped on Barry&#8217;s &#8220;Libertarian&#8221; ideas even as Barack W. Obama was doing everything the GOP wants.</p>
<p>Ritholtz, I think you should go on Kudlow again just for old time&#8217;s sake and to stir the summer pot.</p>
<p>By the way, is Don Luskin still alive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186234</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186234</guid>
		<description>HCF

Not only that (re: overbuilt supply) but there was a significant number of housing units (single family, condo, etc) built that was almost purely flipping inventory, built on spec and scarfed up by flippers by the dozen.  I&#039;m sure it was relatively small compared to overall numbers, but when the music stopped that supply of empty housing really exacerbated the problem, especially in the condo market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HCF</p>
<p>Not only that (re: overbuilt supply) but there was a significant number of housing units (single family, condo, etc) built that was almost purely flipping inventory, built on spec and scarfed up by flippers by the dozen.  I&#8217;m sure it was relatively small compared to overall numbers, but when the music stopped that supply of empty housing really exacerbated the problem, especially in the condo market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/new-home-sales-fell-328/comment-page-1/#comment-186226</link>
		<dc:creator>Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=29993#comment-186226</guid>
		<description>The old normal was not at all real.  Where the new normal, or the real normal is is anybody&#039;s guess. I suspect it will not exceed 5.5 or quite some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old normal was not at all real.  Where the new normal, or the real normal is is anybody&#8217;s guess. I suspect it will not exceed 5.5 or quite some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

