Personal Income and Employment Interactive Map

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 19th, 2009, 12:02PM

We can’t let a Friday go by without something Employment/Income related. Hence, this lovely  BEA chart, showing changes in personal income by state:

The data for Q1 — yes, it is both old and lagging — is still stunning nonetheless:  74% of the states showed a drop in Personal Income.

>

Personal Income Changes, by State

us-income-map

via Bureau of Economic Analysis

UPDATE: June 22 2009 6:23am

David Rosenberg writes:

“As an aside, the U.S. Commerce Department also released state-by-state income data yesterday for 1Q and found that personal income deflated in 37 states. That is a very generous assessment since whatever income there was reflected government benefits like food stamps, unemployment insurance and welfare.   Income derived from the private sector — remember that part of the economy? —  actually contracted in all 50 states.

Whatever shoot that is, it definitely is not green.”

>

Source:
PERSONAL INCOME AND OUTLAYS
BEA, April 2009

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/pi/pinewsrelease.htm

Personal Income Drops in 37 States
David Wessel
Real Time Economics, June 18, 2009, 9:34 AM ET

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/06/18/personal-income-drops-in-37-states/

27 Responses to “Personal Income and Employment Interactive Map”

  1. call me ahab Says:

    that’s it I am moving to W. Virginia . . . or Kentucky

  2. karen Says:

    As CA goes, so goes the…

    California’s unemployment rate climbed to 11.5 percent in May, the highest in modern record-keeping, the U.S. Department of Labor reported Friday.

    The loss of another 69,000 jobs comes as a blow to the state after unemployment dipped slightly to 11.1 percent in April, according to revised figures. The California Employment Development Department said the government posted the largest job declines in the month, down by 14,200 jobs. Every other sector besides education and health services also saw losses.

    Although the federal agency reported that 48 states and the District of Columbia saw their unemployment rates rise in May, California’s rate was substantially higher than the national rate of 9.4 percent for the month.

    http://news.ino.com/headlines/?newsid=68988482770790

  3. willid3 Says:

    not sure why we are surprised. this is the inevitable result of globalization. when a rich country tries to compete with a poor country on price (which is all that matters any more), the rich country has to devalue its living standards to match or it can’t compete

  4. Mannwich Says:

    The second quarter is likely to be worse. Not surprising at all. And this doesn’t count those who are losing their health insurance plans (my wife lost her dental bene’s), which is basically a de facto salary cut to all at any given company.

  5. Mr. C. Cheese Says:

    Life is good…. US Open on Tv…. this site is so unhappy…..

  6. schoolsout Says:

    Well, I’m in SC and have lost about 15% of my normal pay….in sales, though, so not sure how they measured this.

    Our dealership has cut hours/salary to help keep employees here as long as they can, but cuts across the board, nonetheless.

  7. Stuart Says:

    Sort of strange that NC and SC would be amongst the highest in personal incomes yet these two states have amongst the highest unemployment rates per the BLS state report just issued and in fact are likely worse than printed since the printed unemployment rate would be the U-3 I believe. Using U-6, more reflecting of real employment stress makes reconciling the personal income data and employment data even more difficult.

    http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/06/record-unemployment-rates-in-eight.html

  8. schoolsout Says:

    And I’m probably going to lose my job in the next few months…if the economy stays like it is….which I think is what is going to happen…if not get worse.

  9. ben22 Says:

    hmm, credit hard to come by if it isn’t being taken away altogether and incomes down most places. Couple that with a higher savings rate in a credit based system based on the consumer and I think that puts some Round Up on most of the green shoots.

    Is there anything inflationary about that?

  10. ben22 Says:

    Karen,

    I saw a video with your states Controller the other day on a Bloomberg feed. It was pretty scary outlook to say the least and what he was discussing is going to happen in about 30 days.

  11. rob Says:

    Green shoots!!!!! Business will save on wages by not having to pay so much for the employees they keep…. oh wait a minute WTF! This little jaunt down green(shoots)ville reminds me, I haven’t seen my favorite antagonist Frank around lately… what gives?

  12. karen Says:

    In one respect, however, the CA economy is hard to gauge because a not small percentage of it is a cash economy with a bit of barter going on, too. Still, I feel if CA hadn’t been so mismanaged during the Gray Davis years… and didn’t have such a whacko legislature on both sides, it would be in better fiscal shape to weather this “crisis” (for lack of a better word.)

  13. wally Says:

    Since some of the states showing increases are also said to now have record joblessness, it is hard believe both stories.

  14. DMR Says:

    Zombie Banks Thriller video. Lol.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVMshMIPNUg&feature=player_embedded

  15. DL Says:

    Cheese @ 1:01

    Don’t confuse cynicism with unhappiness.

  16. mathman Says:

    and from today’s headlines: Texas billionaire indicted for alleged $7 billion Ponzi scheme

  17. Mannwich Says:

    Great post by Mish on the collapse of credit (= deflation)…..

    http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/06/flow-of-funds-report-offers-hard.html

  18. Ned Bushong Says:

    Mannwich, you have to be careful about posting off topic subjects. Barry will delete them.

  19. Mannwich Says:

    @Ned: I don’t think this is entirely off-topic. It’s related to the inflation and deflation issue, and so is, I believe, the drop in personal income. Why don’t we let Barry decide?

  20. Thor Says:

    Karen – I agree. Sad that we live in such a wealthy state with such a terrible financial mess. I’m wondering how the current mess is going to translate in the next state legislature elections.

  21. Mark E Hoffer Says:

    Jeff,

    to see a weblog post that should be deleted, just remember:

    “self-appointed Thread-Stasi can FBM.”
    ~~

  22. rob Says:

    We’re all just guests of Barry’s. He has the right to delete any and all that he doesn’t approve of. Otherwise it will just become Yahoo Message boards… and how much value do you find there?

  23. Porsche87 Says:

    Taking Karen’s point a step further, if the world’s 9th largest economy (CA) has high unemployment, then US tax revenues will suffer accordingly. Add in the huge rush to Treasuries, whose meager earnings are not taxed, and the investment losses that will be claimed for years to come. So falling revenues and rising expenditures. How long will the US be able to borrow it’s way forward before it all collapses?

  24. I-Man Says:

    Good to see everyone asking the right questions…

    But I didnt doubt any of you for a second. Its the majority of the population that I worry about.

  25. Pat G. Says:

    There are large contingent Native American populations in both NM and OK. The various tribes living in both states have been living with 50%+ unemployment rates for decades. That is perhaps why this latest downturn hasn’t impacted those states to the degree it has others.

  26. Christopher Says:

    I’m surprised to see WY as bright red. I thought that was one of the “bright spots”.

    Kinda looks to me like the states with lots of military bases are doing relatively well.

    Meh….I’m a bit loaded….and half color blind.

  27. limaur Says:

    But surprisingly “”disposable”" personal income went up , and that’s the one that matters. It went up from 10642 to 10783.9 or 1.33%.