<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Muscle Car to the Rescue for GM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:03:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WaltFrench</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192716</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltFrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192716</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Please let me know when the convertible model gets released . . .&lt;/I&gt;

. . . so you can drive a rattletrap AND a deathtrap?

Nice to have all the glossy porn (complete with horsepower numbers!!!) but where&#039;s the handling, cornering, braking, . . . data? Cheaply built, uncomfortable, lousy-to-drive cars is What&#039;s Good For GM and America?

Are you one of those street racers that San Jose is trying to clamp down on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Please let me know when the convertible model gets released . . .</i></p>
<p>. . . so you can drive a rattletrap AND a deathtrap?</p>
<p>Nice to have all the glossy porn (complete with horsepower numbers!!!) but where&#8217;s the handling, cornering, braking, . . . data? Cheaply built, uncomfortable, lousy-to-drive cars is What&#8217;s Good For GM and America?</p>
<p>Are you one of those street racers that San Jose is trying to clamp down on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Opinionator: Is G.M. Back From the Dead? - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192255</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Opinionator: Is G.M. Back From the Dead? - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192255</guid>
		<description>[...] Ritholtz of the Big Picture is living the retro-dream (with photos):  The Camaro’s arrival completes a baby boomer trinity of so-called pony cars, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ritholtz of the Big Picture is living the retro-dream (with photos):  The Camaro’s arrival completes a baby boomer trinity of so-called pony cars, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192172</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192172</guid>
		<description>There is just no going past the fact that any guy who can afford the down payments and interest on a sports car and is more than four feet tall will get a girl of some sort once in possession of the car. To heck with the long term consiquences of the debt burden...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is just no going past the fact that any guy who can afford the down payments and interest on a sports car and is more than four feet tall will get a girl of some sort once in possession of the car. To heck with the long term consiquences of the debt burden&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evidently people like the new Camaro &#171; Sharing the truth one thread at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192126</link>
		<dc:creator>Evidently people like the new Camaro &#171; Sharing the truth one thread at a time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192126</guid>
		<description>[...] Kinda looks like the Ford Mustang if you ask me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kinda looks like the Ford Mustang if you ask me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc1</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192079</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192079</guid>
		<description>I agree with Brendan.  Nice car, as with the retro Mustang and Charger.  But can GM succeed living in the past?

There is nothing wrong if these retro cars are a sideline to the main business.  Where I get my concern is that there is no main business for GM.  There is no plan, and I suspect there is no future other than as the America&#039;s version of the 80&#039;s Renault/Peugeot.

We all have to keep in mind that GM was losing billions in 2005, when anyone who could sign their name could get financing to buy a car.  The financial crisis has little to do with GM&#039;s core problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brendan.  Nice car, as with the retro Mustang and Charger.  But can GM succeed living in the past?</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong if these retro cars are a sideline to the main business.  Where I get my concern is that there is no main business for GM.  There is no plan, and I suspect there is no future other than as the America&#8217;s version of the 80&#8217;s Renault/Peugeot.</p>
<p>We all have to keep in mind that GM was losing billions in 2005, when anyone who could sign their name could get financing to buy a car.  The financial crisis has little to do with GM&#8217;s core problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamDenison</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192049</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamDenison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192049</guid>
		<description>Great post. Thanks for sharing the NYT story. Quick correction, the V6 starts at $23,040. Also, the convertible will be available in the first quarter of 2011. Oh, and the V6 gets an amazing 29 hwy mpg while still churning out 304 hp. 

Brendan,

Sorry to hear you feel that way. I hope you&#039;ll take the chance to drive the Camaro before making any more of your claims. We&#039;re having huge success with the Camaro right now. You have to understand, however, that people may come into a dealership to check out the Camaro, but walk out having been exposed to or buying one of our other award winning new vehicles (Chevy Malibu, Traverse, Equinox, etc.). There are great products from Chevy right now and more to come!

Adam Denison
Chevrolet Communications
On Twitter: @AdamDenison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Thanks for sharing the NYT story. Quick correction, the V6 starts at $23,040. Also, the convertible will be available in the first quarter of 2011. Oh, and the V6 gets an amazing 29 hwy mpg while still churning out 304 hp. </p>
<p>Brendan,</p>
<p>Sorry to hear you feel that way. I hope you&#8217;ll take the chance to drive the Camaro before making any more of your claims. We&#8217;re having huge success with the Camaro right now. You have to understand, however, that people may come into a dealership to check out the Camaro, but walk out having been exposed to or buying one of our other award winning new vehicles (Chevy Malibu, Traverse, Equinox, etc.). There are great products from Chevy right now and more to come!</p>
<p>Adam Denison<br />
Chevrolet Communications<br />
On Twitter: @AdamDenison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagyoureit</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192033</link>
		<dc:creator>tagyoureit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192033</guid>
		<description>Last of the V8 Intercepters!

(sorry, watched The Road Warrior again the other night)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last of the V8 Intercepters!</p>
<p>(sorry, watched The Road Warrior again the other night)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192030</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192030</guid>
		<description>Does nothing for me but invoke the feeling that GM is still trying to live in the past.  While GM needs a sales success, that&#039;s not guaranteed with this.  If you recall, the latest T-Bird sold lots of models above MSRP at first, and then became a sales failure once the initial glitz faded.  And while the Charger is doing much better, it has had a lot of copies go to fleets (esp. Hertz and police forces).  The Mustang, of course, is a perennial winner.  But the Camaro is no Mustang; for one, it has the Corvette to compete with and for two it&#039;s history is too segmented.  GM really needs something that appeals beyond the retirement crowd who wants a Chevy but can&#039;t afford a Corvette, and auto repair techs who can&#039;t even afford a new Camaro.  

I can&#039;t help but think that this will suffer a fate similar to the GTO.  While this car gets GM some sales and may turn out to be a money maker, is this really the image they want to portray?  Bringing back a car that was notorious for being designed by cutting corners for the sake of cost and horsepower really doesn&#039;t seem like a &quot;brand builder&quot; to me; it strikes me more as lipstick on a pig.  That&#039;s exactly the image that GM needs to shake - nice looking cars with bad bones.  GM is building better cars, but people still don&#039;t know it.  Toyota sells Corollas because the Prius is cutting edge and they feel like they&#039;re getting a reliable car with the newest and best technology by buying a Toyota.  Even if it is a great car, Chevy&#039;s not going to sell many Cobalts or Colorados because the Camaro makes lots of horsepower and appeals to dad/grandpa.  Yet another retro car is not going to stay in the spotlight long enough for the average consumer to notice.  GM needs to overcompensate for years of neglect on the technology and reliability fronts and this car doesn&#039;t do that, in fact, it may turn out to do the complete opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does nothing for me but invoke the feeling that GM is still trying to live in the past.  While GM needs a sales success, that&#8217;s not guaranteed with this.  If you recall, the latest T-Bird sold lots of models above MSRP at first, and then became a sales failure once the initial glitz faded.  And while the Charger is doing much better, it has had a lot of copies go to fleets (esp. Hertz and police forces).  The Mustang, of course, is a perennial winner.  But the Camaro is no Mustang; for one, it has the Corvette to compete with and for two it&#8217;s history is too segmented.  GM really needs something that appeals beyond the retirement crowd who wants a Chevy but can&#8217;t afford a Corvette, and auto repair techs who can&#8217;t even afford a new Camaro.  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but think that this will suffer a fate similar to the GTO.  While this car gets GM some sales and may turn out to be a money maker, is this really the image they want to portray?  Bringing back a car that was notorious for being designed by cutting corners for the sake of cost and horsepower really doesn&#8217;t seem like a &#8220;brand builder&#8221; to me; it strikes me more as lipstick on a pig.  That&#8217;s exactly the image that GM needs to shake &#8211; nice looking cars with bad bones.  GM is building better cars, but people still don&#8217;t know it.  Toyota sells Corollas because the Prius is cutting edge and they feel like they&#8217;re getting a reliable car with the newest and best technology by buying a Toyota.  Even if it is a great car, Chevy&#8217;s not going to sell many Cobalts or Colorados because the Camaro makes lots of horsepower and appeals to dad/grandpa.  Yet another retro car is not going to stay in the spotlight long enough for the average consumer to notice.  GM needs to overcompensate for years of neglect on the technology and reliability fronts and this car doesn&#8217;t do that, in fact, it may turn out to do the complete opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urkel</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-192029</link>
		<dc:creator>Urkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-192029</guid>
		<description>Looks like the more recent version of the Ford Mustang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the more recent version of the Ford Mustang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deanscamaro</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/a-muscle-car-to-the-rescue-for-gm/comment-page-1/#comment-191965</link>
		<dc:creator>deanscamaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31867#comment-191965</guid>
		<description>It is about the first thing GM has done right in years.  It may not be the solution for returning their overall sales to past years glories, but it is a seed that might help.  It is a good design and that is something coming from a &#039;69 Camaro owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is about the first thing GM has done right in years.  It may not be the solution for returning their overall sales to past years glories, but it is a seed that might help.  It is a good design and that is something coming from a &#8216;69 Camaro owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
