<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger Response to CNBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197235</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197235</guid>
		<description>I must say I really enjoyed Jeff Macke&#039;s last visit on his show. That was absolutely hilarious!! I just wonder who bet Jeff would not do it. Well, He did it!! Now pay up!  :)  LOL!!

Oh God, I loved it!!

Thanks Jeff! He and Us all deserved it. It was great!

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say I really enjoyed Jeff Macke&#8217;s last visit on his show. That was absolutely hilarious!! I just wonder who bet Jeff would not do it. Well, He did it!! Now pay up!  :)  LOL!!</p>
<p>Oh God, I loved it!!</p>
<p>Thanks Jeff! He and Us all deserved it. It was great!</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuriousCreature</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197123</link>
		<dc:creator>CuriousCreature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197123</guid>
		<description>The most prescient financial news reporting this year has ironically come from the Daily Show.  Jon Stewart gets it at a level that most of the captured journalists do not.

Dennis Kneale is not a serious journalist.  At a time when we most need accurate truthful financial news, Dennis gives us Pepsi Light.

Just not interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most prescient financial news reporting this year has ironically come from the Daily Show.  Jon Stewart gets it at a level that most of the captured journalists do not.</p>
<p>Dennis Kneale is not a serious journalist.  At a time when we most need accurate truthful financial news, Dennis gives us Pepsi Light.</p>
<p>Just not interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shakazulu</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197095</link>
		<dc:creator>shakazulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197095</guid>
		<description>So, being the skeptic of skeptics that I am, I was giving the whole MSM vs. blogosphere topic some consideration. I must point out that I do like to frequent Ritholtz and I think Barry is a stand up guy. However, on the other hand I think it is imperative that people be aware that some people will do ANYTHING for money, power and control. 

I find this to be an interesting topic considering the whole Dennis &quot;the recession is over&quot; Kneal story and the fact that I recently saw a clip of Jim Rogers stating that he isn&#039;t affiliated with one of the blogs published under his name. I really don&#039;t think the anonimity issue is overly relevant as with the technology and intelligence services we have available anyone responsible for hosting domains that might publish outright falsehoods or systemic threats could most likely be tracked down with enough effort. Besides, it is not like jouranlists within the mainstream media who go by their &quot;real&quot; names have not been known to cast outright lies in the past.    

All successful traders understand that when placing bets on market direction you are essentailly doing battle with an opponent.  I am not writing this regarding any specific financial blogs but, I don&#039;t think that at this point in time anyone can rule out the possibility that large corporations, institutions or hedge funds might actually resort to using what appear to be small time homemade blogs to intentionally mislead readers or provide disinformation. 

I do not care to endorse any of the big MSM financial news outlets even despite the fact that I understand the place and importance of programming in modern civilized society. Rather, the message I am trying to convey is that readers should take into consideration the &quot;art of war&quot; when it comes to money and course of empire. Psychological operations come in many different forms, some of them slick and well capitalized with the backings of governments and some of them grass roots and reliant on individuals. Just because a blog looks to be put together by a flunky in his mom&#039;s basement doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that it is.

BR, I would love to know your thoughts on my ramblings and, if by some chance you have the opportunity to question Mr. Kneale about wheter he thinks that large corporations might actually resort to such shenanigans it would also be greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, being the skeptic of skeptics that I am, I was giving the whole MSM vs. blogosphere topic some consideration. I must point out that I do like to frequent Ritholtz and I think Barry is a stand up guy. However, on the other hand I think it is imperative that people be aware that some people will do ANYTHING for money, power and control. </p>
<p>I find this to be an interesting topic considering the whole Dennis &#8220;the recession is over&#8221; Kneal story and the fact that I recently saw a clip of Jim Rogers stating that he isn&#8217;t affiliated with one of the blogs published under his name. I really don&#8217;t think the anonimity issue is overly relevant as with the technology and intelligence services we have available anyone responsible for hosting domains that might publish outright falsehoods or systemic threats could most likely be tracked down with enough effort. Besides, it is not like jouranlists within the mainstream media who go by their &#8220;real&#8221; names have not been known to cast outright lies in the past.    </p>
<p>All successful traders understand that when placing bets on market direction you are essentailly doing battle with an opponent.  I am not writing this regarding any specific financial blogs but, I don&#8217;t think that at this point in time anyone can rule out the possibility that large corporations, institutions or hedge funds might actually resort to using what appear to be small time homemade blogs to intentionally mislead readers or provide disinformation. </p>
<p>I do not care to endorse any of the big MSM financial news outlets even despite the fact that I understand the place and importance of programming in modern civilized society. Rather, the message I am trying to convey is that readers should take into consideration the &#8220;art of war&#8221; when it comes to money and course of empire. Psychological operations come in many different forms, some of them slick and well capitalized with the backings of governments and some of them grass roots and reliant on individuals. Just because a blog looks to be put together by a flunky in his mom&#8217;s basement doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that it is.</p>
<p>BR, I would love to know your thoughts on my ramblings and, if by some chance you have the opportunity to question Mr. Kneale about wheter he thinks that large corporations might actually resort to such shenanigans it would also be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soupmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197085</link>
		<dc:creator>Soupmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197085</guid>
		<description>When I first started trading in 2000, it became crystal clear early on that if you wanted to trade the first thing you&#039;d do every morning is turn off the G****** TV.  Why do all of you know so much about CNBC if you dislike it so intensely?  Their job is to broadcast anything they feel like and your job is to make money.    Get over the fact that the two are in conflict.   What&#039;s called news today is entertainment, where&#039;s the big surprise.  NEWS = Nothing Ever Worth Saying.

My trading &quot;uniform&quot; back in 2000 consisted of jeans and a T-shirt that I had made that stated
CNBC, Corporate News Bullshit Central.  At the request of two anchors at that time, one of which is still on the air, I sent them each a shirt, about a month apart.   It took two of them to realize it was an insult, because after the second shirt arrived I was no longer an e-mail buddy.   Gee, was it something I said?  Now, are these people you really want to listen to for any kind of advice?
CNBC, also could stand for Cheerleading No-Brains Crowd, or CNBC - Complete Nonsense Broadcast Continuously.

Do you actually think Judge Judy&#039;s courtroom is indicative of actual courtrooms across America?   If so, I guess you think CNBC actually has a purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first started trading in 2000, it became crystal clear early on that if you wanted to trade the first thing you&#8217;d do every morning is turn off the G****** TV.  Why do all of you know so much about CNBC if you dislike it so intensely?  Their job is to broadcast anything they feel like and your job is to make money.    Get over the fact that the two are in conflict.   What&#8217;s called news today is entertainment, where&#8217;s the big surprise.  NEWS = Nothing Ever Worth Saying.</p>
<p>My trading &#8220;uniform&#8221; back in 2000 consisted of jeans and a T-shirt that I had made that stated<br />
CNBC, Corporate News Bullshit Central.  At the request of two anchors at that time, one of which is still on the air, I sent them each a shirt, about a month apart.   It took two of them to realize it was an insult, because after the second shirt arrived I was no longer an e-mail buddy.   Gee, was it something I said?  Now, are these people you really want to listen to for any kind of advice?<br />
CNBC, also could stand for Cheerleading No-Brains Crowd, or CNBC &#8211; Complete Nonsense Broadcast Continuously.</p>
<p>Do you actually think Judge Judy&#8217;s courtroom is indicative of actual courtrooms across America?   If so, I guess you think CNBC actually has a purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News from around the web: 2009-07-25 - Credit Writedowns</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197081</link>
		<dc:creator>News from around the web: 2009-07-25 - Credit Writedowns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197081</guid>
		<description>[...] More interesting comments by Dr. DoomBlogger Response to CNBC &#124; The Big Picture [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More interesting comments by Dr. DoomBlogger Response to CNBC | The Big Picture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvienne</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197074</link>
		<dc:creator>cvienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197074</guid>
		<description>@Quonk

&quot;Dennis Kneale is simply there to provide cover for Caruso-Cabrera…and vice-versa. In October she suggested that the true measure of the strength of a currency is based on the strength of the country’s military. This week she compared California to Iraq while discussing the state’s financial difficulties. She looks good in a tight sweater&quot;

---

AGREED

She looks good in a tight sweater... I&#039;d say GREAT...But not as good as Liz Claman (in the same)...That&#039;s all this DUMB ASS can add...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Quonk</p>
<p>&#8220;Dennis Kneale is simply there to provide cover for Caruso-Cabrera…and vice-versa. In October she suggested that the true measure of the strength of a currency is based on the strength of the country’s military. This week she compared California to Iraq while discussing the state’s financial difficulties. She looks good in a tight sweater&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>AGREED</p>
<p>She looks good in a tight sweater&#8230; I&#8217;d say GREAT&#8230;But not as good as Liz Claman (in the same)&#8230;That&#8217;s all this DUMB ASS can add&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark mchugh</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197059</link>
		<dc:creator>mark mchugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197059</guid>
		<description>That graphic&#039;s absolutely brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That graphic&#8217;s absolutely brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197035</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197035</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dow Now Driven by Kudlow&#039;s Coke Use!!&quot;

LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dow Now Driven by Kudlow&#8217;s Coke Use!!&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quonk</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197031</link>
		<dc:creator>Quonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197031</guid>
		<description>Dennis Kneale is simply there to provide cover for Caruso-Cabrera...and vice-versa.  In October she suggested that the true measure of the strength of a currency is based on the strength of the country&#039;s military.  This week she compared California to Iraq while discussing the state&#039;s financial difficulties.  She looks good in a tight sweater...but perhaps she should quit CNBC and tour with Ann Coulter so that she can blather on about whatever she wants without letting the facts get in the way.

Meanwhile, Ernie is back on Sesame Street, wondering when Bert went berserk, left the hood, and started spewing uninformed pablum under the stage name Dennis Kneale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis Kneale is simply there to provide cover for Caruso-Cabrera&#8230;and vice-versa.  In October she suggested that the true measure of the strength of a currency is based on the strength of the country&#8217;s military.  This week she compared California to Iraq while discussing the state&#8217;s financial difficulties.  She looks good in a tight sweater&#8230;but perhaps she should quit CNBC and tour with Ann Coulter so that she can blather on about whatever she wants without letting the facts get in the way.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Ernie is back on Sesame Street, wondering when Bert went berserk, left the hood, and started spewing uninformed pablum under the stage name Dennis Kneale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/blogger-response-to-cnbc/comment-page-1/#comment-197010</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33236#comment-197010</guid>
		<description>Please ask Dennis why CNBC is starting to resemble WWE. It feels like the pathetic attempt to generate eyeballs by any means necessary while the house burns to the ground ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please ask Dennis why CNBC is starting to resemble WWE. It feels like the pathetic attempt to generate eyeballs by any means necessary while the house burns to the ground &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

