Employment Sector Gainers and Losers

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 19th, 2009, 4:15PM

Terrific chart accompanying this Sunday Times article by Louis Uchitelle, titled When, Oh When, Will HELP Be WANTED?

>

uchitelle-grfk

Chart via NYT

>

Source:
When, Oh When, Will HELP Be WANTED?
LOUIS UCHITELLE
NYT, July 18, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/weekinreview/19uchitelle.html

13 Responses to “Employment Sector Gainers and Losers”

  1. alfred e Says:

    Tres cool.

    Death and dying.

    Help us “Boomers” ease our way out.

    Who else can afford to pay?

    Education? Yeah. Like wean them off the iPods Daddy bought them. Don’t think so.

    Money for education has become a lost cause. My cat is more trainable.

    When will men ever learn that cats and women are going to do what they want?

  2. willid3 Says:

    aren’t some of these ’sectors’ including others? like the one labeled all manufacturing, it should include all forms of manufacturing (such as cars, airplanes, food, chemicals, clothing, etc) right? and is the losses in financial/insurance understated? not sure that computer design has had any growth, not at least according to former co-workers. and considering the problems states have, that large number of state funded educators is about to get a big pruning soon. and with the collapsing wages (and jobs), the fall off in health care jobs won’t be long in coming either.

  3. Avl Dao Says:

    I am not impressed by this NYT chart much; by not including the SIZE of the sectors (i.e. the size of the headcounts ), it provides no context whatsoever. It’s like ‘empty calory’ foods.

    In the recent past, the NYT has produced great graphics showing the size of the sector sas well as their percentage decline.

    Finally, the cummulative 2-year decline from 2007 is more important to today’s economy than the 1-yr change; the excess capacity of the US was defined by 2007’s over-reach at the heigt of the madness….the bubble; it is that over-reach that negatively impacts us in terms of our excess auto production capacity, overbuilding of CRE, excess leverage, excess usage of the Home-As-ATM to fuel excessive payroll levels in retail, hospitality, etc, just to rattle off a few.

  4. Avl Dao Says:

    Getting back to 2007…..ask, as of today, July 2009, which are we regretting more:
    Business expansion, household spending and investment decisions we made in 2008?
    Or….
    Business expansion, household spending and investment decisions we made in 2007 (or in 2006) at the height of the madness the irrational exuberance?

    Here in Asheville, North Carolina, it’s those 2006 & 2007 decisions that are devastating this tourism, retail, and retirement-dependent economy. Likewise for the state’s other metros and nearby Atlanta.

  5. super_trooper Says:

    @alfred “When will men ever learn that cats and women are going to do what they want?”
    Sounds like the smart move is to become gay and get a dog. Next step in evolution.

  6. flipspiceland Says:

    Considering that the US Government likely has the most employees under one employer’s masthead, it would be good to know the NUMBER of employees that are thriving under the taxpayers who are paying for it.

    That 6.0 per cent is not very meaningful. 6.0 percent of a million people is 60,000. while 6.0 % of 200,000 is 12,000.

    Besides that I don’t believe the 6.0% anyhow. It’s a lie.

  7. Pat G. Says:

    The two largest losers have lost 8% more jobs than the gainers have added together.

  8. investorinpa Says:

    I have noticed an increase in the number of financial bloggers since the recession started. Did that get cut off the chart when you posted it? :-)

  9. lalaland Says:

    This is off topic a little bit, but wouldn’t it be nice if Goldman could find 3 billion to lend to CIT to keep them in business since the bondholders are agreeing to the other 3? Shame it will spent on d-bags profiting off government guarantees and cheap money instead…. If I was Geithner I might be inclined to say no increases in bonuses until you don’t need government backing for your bonds, don’t need TALF or whatever the hell lending program they are in, etc, and oh, by the way, let it be known you are not to big to fail – we will nationalize, unwind, and liquidate you if you f*ck this up. AND we are opening an investigation into your frontrunning activities…(hello Patrick Fitzgerald or the like)

  10. Bruce in Tn Says:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/19/governors-health-care-label-unfunded-mandate/

    Many Governors Against Health Care Bill, Label it Unfunded Mandate

    “In a heated closed-door session, both Republican and Democratic governors criticized the bill that many said could turn into another unfunded mandate from Congress. The issue dominated the afternoon discussion.

    “The governors are concerned about unfunded mandates, another situation where the Federal government says you must do X and you must pay for it. Well if they want to reform health care, they should figure out what the rules are and how they are going to pay for it,” Democratic Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer told FOX News.

    “Instead what they are proposing is — they’re figuring out the rules and forcing the states to pay for it,” he said.”

    The way this thing is written, it won’t help employment….but I’ve been chewed on in here before for this but I will say when Democratic governors come out and tell you this…just keep both eyes open…

    Goodnight.

  11. Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle Says:

    Bruce in Tn:
    Which version is he talking about? There is all sorts of stuff flying through the different committees right now.

  12. Evening Briefing for July 19th | EconUp Says:

    [...] Where jobs have been gained and lost in the [...]

  13. Recession Gainers and Losers « Free Market Mojo Says:

    [...] HT: The Big Picture [...]