Is Wall Street too optimistic ?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 29th, 2009, 4:20PM

Airtime: Wed. Jul. 29 2009 | 11:05 AM ET

Does Wall Street have it right or are they being too optimistic about the impending recovery? Erik Ristuben, of Russell Investments, and Peter Boockvar, of Miller Tabak, share their insight.

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

3 Responses to “Is Wall Street too optimistic ?”

  1. davossherman@gmail.com Says:

    150,000,000 workers in 2007.
    27,000,000 less today.

    That is 18% unemployment.

    No ATM’s vis a vis the HELOCs.

    Housing: 19,000,000 vacant homes, 4-5 million on the market in addition to that.

    1.5 trillion more coming in residential Alt-A’s and Option Arms, in addition to a 3.5++++ trillion dollar CRE collapse.

    Housing bottom? You want to see a bottom just wait another year. By the way, who is going to buy the homes built for the subprime borrower, for the Alt-A borrower, for the Option Arm borrower, for the poor folks who declared BK or sent their keys jingling in or wound up in foreclosure as a result of this.

    We are printing money to pay for the deficit which we can’t borrow vis a vis the selling of bonds.

    Look, I won’t spout off the moron thing, Jim Rogers said it nicely: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZykaBfQMbt8&feature=player_embedded listen to these guys and gals and you will go BROKE!

    80 trillion in debt, a 2 trillion dollar deficit and not enough bond buyers – I see economic collapse not recovery.

  2. Mike in Nola Says:

    Couldn’t watch it all as Larry took over in the middle to tell us how wonderful everything is. Interesting that they remove aircraft to show an increase in captial goods this month, but didn’t mention doing that last month when it pumped the numbers.

  3. ben22 Says:

    Mike,

    That’s just part of the game, just like last year, before the commodity meltdown it was: “well, if you take out financials, things aren’t so bad)

53 queries. 0.302 seconds.