<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeremy Siegel is not having a good year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:27:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CRM 2.0 meets the financial sector, at last &#171; Fredzimny&#8217;s CCCCC Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-2/#comment-195290</link>
		<dc:creator>CRM 2.0 meets the financial sector, at last &#171; Fredzimny&#8217;s CCCCC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-195290</guid>
		<description>[...]  Jeremy Siegel is not having a good year  (ritholtz.com)   Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Paul Greenberg Interview &#8211; CRM Expert &#124; LexnetNo TitleWhat is the most common CRM mistake?CRM and Social CRM Articles, Blogs, and Resources (week of June 22) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Jeremy Siegel is not having a good year  (ritholtz.com)   Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Paul Greenberg Interview &#8211; CRM Expert | LexnetNo TitleWhat is the most common CRM mistake?CRM and Social CRM Articles, Blogs, and Resources (week of June 22) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leisa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-2/#comment-193071</link>
		<dc:creator>Leisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-193071</guid>
		<description>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=476981

I&#039;ve left this link here and other places.  I consider this paper:  Irrational Optimism, (Dimson etal) to be a must read.  Some of Barry&#039;s readers might find it worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=476981" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=476981</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve left this link here and other places.  I consider this paper:  Irrational Optimism, (Dimson etal) to be a must read.  Some of Barry&#8217;s readers might find it worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidmando</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-2/#comment-192829</link>
		<dc:creator>sidmando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192829</guid>
		<description>This should come as no surprise to anyone who has followed Siegel&#039;s commentaries over the past few years. Not only is he intellectually dishonest, he also has been completely wrong about the financial crisis. To wit, here&#039;s a quote from a Sept., 2007 article by Siegel in which he makes a prediction every bit as foolish as Irving Fisher&#039;s forecast of stocks reaching a &quot;permanently high plateau&quot; in 1929.

&quot;The Fed made the right move at the right time and... stanched a contagion that threatened to turn a problem isolated to the real estate sector into a full blown liquidity crisis and recession... Thanks to their concerted actions, the sub-prime crisis should not turn into a recession.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should come as no surprise to anyone who has followed Siegel&#8217;s commentaries over the past few years. Not only is he intellectually dishonest, he also has been completely wrong about the financial crisis. To wit, here&#8217;s a quote from a Sept., 2007 article by Siegel in which he makes a prediction every bit as foolish as Irving Fisher&#8217;s forecast of stocks reaching a &#8220;permanently high plateau&#8221; in 1929.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Fed made the right move at the right time and&#8230; stanched a contagion that threatened to turn a problem isolated to the real estate sector into a full blown liquidity crisis and recession&#8230; Thanks to their concerted actions, the sub-prime crisis should not turn into a recession.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday links: parasitic trading Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192631</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday links: parasitic trading Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192631</guid>
		<description>[...] Just how long run does stock market data really run?  (WSJ also Big Picture) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just how long run does stock market data really run?  (WSJ also Big Picture) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob A</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192569</guid>
		<description>Buy and Hold
Santa Claus
the Tooth Fairy
Apples are easier to use
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy and Hold<br />
Santa Claus<br />
the Tooth Fairy<br />
Apples are easier to use<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdg123</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192554</link>
		<dc:creator>bdg123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192554</guid>
		<description>A spade is a spade.  Siegel is a clown in professor&#039;s clothing.  Not only is his book full of deluded hyperbole, but his understanding of economics is astoundingly silly.  Time after time they had this pumper writing articles for Yahoo Finance and appearing on CNBC telling us how cheap stocks were and how great the economy was before the crash.  I played pin the tail on the donkey with some of those statements.  I mean there was one article on Yahoo Finance citing this utterly bullshit valuation method that any high school student could have said was manure.

I have nothing personal against Siegel and wish him the best.  But, until we start to seriously criticize and call out the completely baseless dogma spewed by these clowns, society will continue to hold onto false truths and those with something intelligence to say will never get their voices heard.  That means we&#039;ll never get this economy turned around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A spade is a spade.  Siegel is a clown in professor&#8217;s clothing.  Not only is his book full of deluded hyperbole, but his understanding of economics is astoundingly silly.  Time after time they had this pumper writing articles for Yahoo Finance and appearing on CNBC telling us how cheap stocks were and how great the economy was before the crash.  I played pin the tail on the donkey with some of those statements.  I mean there was one article on Yahoo Finance citing this utterly bullshit valuation method that any high school student could have said was manure.</p>
<p>I have nothing personal against Siegel and wish him the best.  But, until we start to seriously criticize and call out the completely baseless dogma spewed by these clowns, society will continue to hold onto false truths and those with something intelligence to say will never get their voices heard.  That means we&#8217;ll never get this economy turned around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life through these eyes :: Oops, Buy and Hold takes a fall :: July :: 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192518</link>
		<dc:creator>Life through these eyes :: Oops, Buy and Hold takes a fall :: July :: 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192518</guid>
		<description>[...] As Zweig sardonically notes, &#8220;Another emperor of the late bull market, it seems, has turned out to have no clothes.&#8221; Taken from The Big Picture (link here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As Zweig sardonically notes, &ldquo;Another emperor of the late bull market, it seems, has turned out to have no clothes.&rdquo; Taken from The Big Picture (link here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2009-07-12</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192505</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2009-07-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192505</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeremy Siegel is not having a good year &#124; The Big Picture [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeremy Siegel is not having a good year | The Big Picture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfred e</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192459</link>
		<dc:creator>alfred e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192459</guid>
		<description>@Mike in NOLA:  Agree.  

But what most don&#039;t consider is how much wealth British &quot;royalty&quot; owns in North America.  Yeah, we won the Revolutionary War.  And confiscated exactly what?  

Peabody Coal.  Wealth knows no national boundaries.  

They&#039;ve been sucking on our teat for centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike in NOLA:  Agree.  </p>
<p>But what most don&#8217;t consider is how much wealth British &#8220;royalty&#8221; owns in North America.  Yeah, we won the Revolutionary War.  And confiscated exactly what?  </p>
<p>Peabody Coal.  Wealth knows no national boundaries.  </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve been sucking on our teat for centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jeremy-siegel-is-not-having-a-good-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192437</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31909#comment-192437</guid>
		<description>Damn, agreed with the 20year argument.
----------------
I never said equities PERFECTLY matched inflation.  But I do believe that they offer better protection than a lot of other products out there.

I would not buy equities now as a protection against inflation because there are currently NO inflation expectations set in business models.

When inflation starts increasing, margins take a hit due to an initial lack of pricing power and increasing costs.  Stocks tank and then you get in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, agreed with the 20year argument.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
I never said equities PERFECTLY matched inflation.  But I do believe that they offer better protection than a lot of other products out there.</p>
<p>I would not buy equities now as a protection against inflation because there are currently NO inflation expectations set in business models.</p>
<p>When inflation starts increasing, margins take a hit due to an initial lack of pricing power and increasing costs.  Stocks tank and then you get in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
