<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jobless claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cfischer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/comment-page-1/#comment-191544</link>
		<dc:creator>cfischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/#comment-191544</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the holiday Friday have an impact on this number?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the holiday Friday have an impact on this number?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davossherman@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/comment-page-1/#comment-191506</link>
		<dc:creator>davossherman@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/#comment-191506</guid>
		<description>PS Another way to look at it is this: In 2007 150,000,000 employed, now 26,000,000 are unemployed or under employed.

That is 17%.

Another thing to consider: Those auto jobs AREN&#039;T coming back.

IMHO &quot;much better than the consensus of 603&quot; is not something that should be within. First these numbers make the former Enron book cookers green with envy, second THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A JOBLESS ECONOMIC RECOVERY, third: This like derivatives has systemic risks, more jobs will be lost.

I&#039;d stick to shadow stats for my job loss numbers - this BLS stuff is really BS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS Another way to look at it is this: In 2007 150,000,000 employed, now 26,000,000 are unemployed or under employed.</p>
<p>That is 17%.</p>
<p>Another thing to consider: Those auto jobs AREN&#8217;T coming back.</p>
<p>IMHO &#8220;much better than the consensus of 603&#8243; is not something that should be within. First these numbers make the former Enron book cookers green with envy, second THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A JOBLESS ECONOMIC RECOVERY, third: This like derivatives has systemic risks, more jobs will be lost.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d stick to shadow stats for my job loss numbers &#8211; this BLS stuff is really BS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davossherman@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/comment-page-1/#comment-191503</link>
		<dc:creator>davossherman@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/jobless-claims-4/#comment-191503</guid>
		<description>Unemployment:

Headline: 

March 652,000 actual 853,000
April    504,000 actual 682,000
May      322,000 actual 631,000
June      467,000 actual 698,000

Source:http://economicedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/thunder-road-report-stop-inflation-or.html
whitepaper within</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unemployment:</p>
<p>Headline: </p>
<p>March 652,000 actual 853,000<br />
April    504,000 actual 682,000<br />
May      322,000 actual 631,000<br />
June      467,000 actual 698,000</p>
<p>Source:http://economicedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/thunder-road-report-stop-inflation-or.html<br />
whitepaper within</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
