<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Linkage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:28:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-2/#comment-197784</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197784</guid>
		<description>Inverted hammer not inverted hanging man :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inverted hammer not inverted hanging man <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197783</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197783</guid>
		<description>@cvienne

Just took a quick look at the VIX chart. The shadow is way too short for a inverted hanging man. It should be at least 3x the body of the candle. Also it should gap down. This would indicate that the bulls put in a floor (they can&#039;t take the pain anymore). Then a close above the high of the candle would give confirmation of the reversal.

I&#039;ve read all of Nison&#039;s books but my favorite one on candles is &quot;Candlestick Charting Explained&quot; by Gregory L. Morris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cvienne</p>
<p>Just took a quick look at the VIX chart. The shadow is way too short for a inverted hanging man. It should be at least 3x the body of the candle. Also it should gap down. This would indicate that the bulls put in a floor (they can&#8217;t take the pain anymore). Then a close above the high of the candle would give confirmation of the reversal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read all of Nison&#8217;s books but my favorite one on candles is &#8220;Candlestick Charting Explained&#8221; by Gregory L. Morris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197779</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197779</guid>
		<description>@Onlooker from Troy
quote: &quot;But the market doesn&#039;t care, until it cares, then - uh oh.&quot;

I&#039;m still laughing at this comment. You&#039;re right. The market cares about growth and when they realize there won&#039;t be any growth then look out below.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Onlooker from Troy<br />
quote: &#8220;But the market doesn&#8217;t care, until it cares, then &#8211; uh oh.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still laughing at this comment. You&#8217;re right. The market cares about growth and when they realize there won&#8217;t be any growth then look out below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197770</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197770</guid>
		<description>@Onlooker:  Excellent point.  We can debate all these stats all we want (e.g. GDP), but who really cares if those things are improving if it feels like a recession?  Well, CNBC cares because Wall Street and the markets (their masters) will be happy.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Onlooker:  Excellent point.  We can debate all these stats all we want (e.g. GDP), but who really cares if those things are improving if it feels like a recession?  Well, CNBC cares because Wall Street and the markets (their masters) will be happy&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197767</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197767</guid>
		<description>“It’s going to feel like a recession, even when it ends.”

Another point I&#039;ve been trying to make with all the recovery talk.  Does it really matter?  When the realization sinks in that there&#039;s not much growth coming after the cliff diving, the market won&#039;t be happy (kind of like &#039;02 but MUCH worse).  And the folks out there slogging through their daily lives sure won&#039;t notice the difference.

But the market doesn&#039;t care, until it cares, then - uh oh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It’s going to feel like a recession, even when it ends.”</p>
<p>Another point I&#8217;ve been trying to make with all the recovery talk.  Does it really matter?  When the realization sinks in that there&#8217;s not much growth coming after the cliff diving, the market won&#8217;t be happy (kind of like &#8216;02 but MUCH worse).  And the folks out there slogging through their daily lives sure won&#8217;t notice the difference.</p>
<p>But the market doesn&#8217;t care, until it cares, then &#8211; uh oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvienne</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197764</link>
		<dc:creator>cvienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197764</guid>
		<description>@AmenRa

&quot;Plus I haven’t seen any reversal candles on the daily chart (today looked liked a hanging man but the shadow isn’t long enough).&quot;

Interestingly, the VIX candle today looked a little like a hanging man...I&#039;m not surprised...I think many went in to today expecting some profits from equities to get ready to buy some of the auction...

It didn&#039;t seem like much was proven there (which accounts for the VIX stick perhaps)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AmenRa</p>
<p>&#8220;Plus I haven’t seen any reversal candles on the daily chart (today looked liked a hanging man but the shadow isn’t long enough).&#8221;</p>
<p>Interestingly, the VIX candle today looked a little like a hanging man&#8230;I&#8217;m not surprised&#8230;I think many went in to today expecting some profits from equities to get ready to buy some of the auction&#8230;</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t seem like much was proven there (which accounts for the VIX stick perhaps)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvienne</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197762</link>
		<dc:creator>cvienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197762</guid>
		<description>@AmenRa

Hey...THANKS for those two posts! (10:33)(10:41)...

That gives me something to clue in on...

After the &quot;melt up&quot; (over 960 which was the 233 day MA), I was starting to feel a little lost and directionless...

Actually, I took a GIANT STEP back from the whole thing back at 908 (which was a FIBO retrace BACK to 956 at the time from the July lows)...It went through that and 930 so easy, it was like...STAND BACK!

I&#039;m going to have to take a look at that 1169 as an outward bogey and watch the behavior inbetween...

I&#039;m still BEARISH long term, but as I posted the other day...&quot;I don&#039;t like to F*** with aliens&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AmenRa</p>
<p>Hey&#8230;THANKS for those two posts! (10:33)(10:41)&#8230;</p>
<p>That gives me something to clue in on&#8230;</p>
<p>After the &#8220;melt up&#8221; (over 960 which was the 233 day MA), I was starting to feel a little lost and directionless&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually, I took a GIANT STEP back from the whole thing back at 908 (which was a FIBO retrace BACK to 956 at the time from the July lows)&#8230;It went through that and 930 so easy, it was like&#8230;STAND BACK!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to have to take a look at that 1169 as an outward bogey and watch the behavior inbetween&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still BEARISH long term, but as I posted the other day&#8230;&#8221;I don&#8217;t like to F*** with aliens&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197750</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197750</guid>
		<description>@cvienne

Almost forgot. The S&amp;P HAS NOT broken the 233ema on the weekly chart (@1169). But it did break the 13ema and the 55ema on the weekly. Now if it gets to the 233ema then it&#039;s abandon all ye shorts the bell doth toll for thee (or something like that).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cvienne</p>
<p>Almost forgot. The S&amp;P HAS NOT broken the 233ema on the weekly chart (@1169). But it did break the 13ema and the 55ema on the weekly. Now if it gets to the 233ema then it&#8217;s abandon all ye shorts the bell doth toll for thee (or something like that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197743</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197743</guid>
		<description>@investorinpa

Why do you think Geithner is talking to China this week in particular?

@cvienne

The S&amp;P has breached its 233ema solidly on 7/23. It also has breached the price needed for a reversal in the monthly 3LB (but it still has yet to close the month above it). The monthly 3LB has been in a downtrend since 1/31/08. Plus I haven&#039;t seen any reversal candles on the daily chart (today looked liked a hanging man but the shadow isn&#039;t long enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@investorinpa</p>
<p>Why do you think Geithner is talking to China this week in particular?</p>
<p>@cvienne</p>
<p>The S&amp;P has breached its 233ema solidly on 7/23. It also has breached the price needed for a reversal in the monthly 3LB (but it still has yet to close the month above it). The monthly 3LB has been in a downtrend since 1/31/08. Plus I haven&#8217;t seen any reversal candles on the daily chart (today looked liked a hanging man but the shadow isn&#8217;t long enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaveCatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/monday-linkage/comment-page-1/#comment-197732</link>
		<dc:creator>WaveCatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33610#comment-197732</guid>
		<description>Not to worry,  Newsweek cover say, &quot;The Recession is Over.&quot;

http://www.newsweek.com/id/208633</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to worry,  Newsweek cover say, &#8220;The Recession is Over.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/208633" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/id/208633</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
