Barry,
That was a shouting match. I was hoping that you would have been granted (by standards of minimal courtesy towards invited guests) the opportunity to actually make your case, even if hastily. It was appallingly bad. Not you, not what you said…not what you had to – or intended to say, but the way in which it turned out.
HOWEVER
I guess the only thing I can think of in a positive light is that it was exposure, and for that I’m happy for ‘ya.
BUT
This is what constitutes television these days? What would a viewer from Mars think of the broadcast? Would that person come away with; “OK, that was the subject, and those were the observations of the participants” No way, and that’s sad.
The anchor sounded – and looked – like he’d been enjoying recreational methamphetamine – or what I imagine someone would be like if they snuffed up some of that stuff, then anchored a TV broadcast. Babbling at 200 mph. Gagh.
Congratulations on your patience, perseverance and intestinal fortitude.
In any great organization it is far, far safer to be wrong with the majority than to be right alone. —John Kenneth Galbraith
Asian currencies continue to sell off vs the $ on the heels of the news yesterday that South Korea said they will look into hot money inflows stemming from the $ carry trade and the Bank of Indonesia said they are looking into the foreign buying of bills. This follows the news a few weeks ago that Taiwan was limiting foreign deposit holdings and Brazil was taxing foreign inflow transactions. As I mentioned yesterday, we may have reached a short term pain threshold in terms of $ weakness and foreign countries are fighting back as they certainly won't wait for...
July 9th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
Barry,
That was a shouting match. I was hoping that you would have been granted (by standards of minimal courtesy towards invited guests) the opportunity to actually make your case, even if hastily. It was appallingly bad. Not you, not what you said…not what you had to – or intended to say, but the way in which it turned out.
HOWEVER
I guess the only thing I can think of in a positive light is that it was exposure, and for that I’m happy for ‘ya.
BUT
This is what constitutes television these days? What would a viewer from Mars think of the broadcast? Would that person come away with; “OK, that was the subject, and those were the observations of the participants” No way, and that’s sad.
The anchor sounded – and looked – like he’d been enjoying recreational methamphetamine – or what I imagine someone would be like if they snuffed up some of that stuff, then anchored a TV broadcast. Babbling at 200 mph. Gagh.
Congratulations on your patience, perseverance and intestinal fortitude.