Financial Reporting in Today’s Economy

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 22nd, 2009, 5:15PM

Should financial media be held accountable for their failure to have warned the public of the current economic downturn? What steps are being taken to avoid this happening in the future?

A panel of leading financial reporters assess the global crisis and discuss the ‘perfect storm’ of events that led to it. Aspiring journalists will hear how to avoid the perils and pitfalls of the profession, and media observers can decide for themselves if the media is to blame.

With Charles Gasparino, on-air editor, CNBC; Farnoosh Torabi, correspondent, TheStreet.com TV; Liz Claman, anchor, Fox Business Network; and Alan Murray, deputy managing editor, The Wall Street Journal; executive editor, Journal Online, and WSJ Television.

Moderated by Jeff Bercovici, Blogger, “Mixed Media,” Portfolio.com.

01:23:47

Wednesday Reading

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 22nd, 2009, 3:30PM

Wednesday linkage  — something for everyone:

Paulson’s Colossal Lack of Judgment (Alhambra)

Jamie Dimon v. Larry Summers (Baseline Scenario)

S&P Commits Professional Suicide With Ratings Round Trip, Underlying CRE Remains Toxic Garbage (Zero Hedge)

Business Journalism: A Vanishing Necessity? (Time) I’m curious as to why they limited this to business journalism . . .

How far will US home prices fall? (Vox EU)

Fiscal ruin of the Western world beckons (Telegraph)

How ever did I miss this? A NIGHT OUT WITH | CODY WILLARD (NYT)

The Manchester Report: 20 ideas for solving the climate crisis (Guardian)

Musicians Find Backers as Labels Wane (NYT)

Turning CT scans into Art (New Scientist)

Anything else clickworthy?

Ratings Agency Showdown: Treasury vs Barney Frank

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 22nd, 2009, 12:43PM

One of my Pet Peeves: The Payola business models at Moody’s Investors Services, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings – meaning the debt securities underwriters pay them for ratings — is unchanged in Obama’s Treasury Department reforms. All they want is some more disclosures and a few restrictions.

A certain Congressman is now convinced these measures are inadequate; Here is the FT:

Credit rating agencies would face a raft of new disclosure rules and restrictions but would not be forced to overhaul their business models under proposed US legislation sent to Congress on Tuesday.

The plan by the US Treasury is aimed at reducing conflicts of interest at rating agencies, boosting the regulatory authority of the US Securities and Exchange Commission over the agencies and reducing the financial system’s reliance on credit ratings.

But critics said the plan, an element of the Obama administration’s broader financial regulatory blueprint, fell far short of what was needed. The proponents of an overhaul of ratings agencies charge that they overlooked the risks of investing in complex, “structured” securities linked to risky mortgages, many of which carried triple A stamps of approval.

Barney Frank, head of the chairman of the House financial services committee, on Tuesday endorsed measures that would overturn requirements that require the use of the credit ratings agencies.

“There are a lot of statutory mandates that people have to rely on credit rating agencies. They’re going to all be repealed,” he told Reuters. (emphasis added)

Barney Frank vs Geithner & Summers. Let’s hope BF is tougher than he looks . . .

>

Source:
US rating agencies escape overhaul
Joanna Chung and Aline van Duyn
FT, July 22 2009

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ad5625dc-764e-11de-9e59-00144feabdc0.html

Foreclosures Are Highly Regional

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 22nd, 2009, 11:30AM

I showed the Realty Trac chart last week showing foreclosure action by state — but the following chart really shows how highly regional foreclosure activity is:

Three states accounted for half of the country’s foreclosure-related activity;  The top 10 states accounted for 75%.

foreclosures-by-state-bar-graph-june-2009

via The Mortgage Reports

King Report: Paradox of Corporate Cost Cutting

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 22nd, 2009, 11:15AM

king-logo

>

Because Ben is back in funny money mode, stocks & commodities are rallying.  But the dollar and the Chinese are not happy; and they are clearly expressing their anger.

The FT: China will use its foreign exchange reserves, the largest in the world, to support and accelerate overseas expansion and acquisitions by Chinese companies, Wen Jiabao, the country’s premier, said in comments published on Tuesday.  [China keeps warning; but Ben keeps reverting to pump mode.]

“We should hasten the implementation of our ‘going out’ strategy and combine the utilization of foreign exchange reserves with the ‘going out’ of our enterprises,” he told Chinese diplomats late on Monday…   [It’s going to be an eventful autumn, boys & girls!]…
Qu Hongbin, chief China economist at HSBC, said: “This is the first time we have heard an official articulation of this policy …to directly support corporations to buy offshore assets.”

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b576ec86-761e-11de-9e59-00144feabdc0.html

Several major corporations (including CAT, UTX, LMT, YHOO) reported top-line misses on Tuesday; however most beat earnings estimates.  The trend of top-line misses is so clear that CNBC commentators uncharacteristically lamented the negativity of the occurrence.

CAT shares rallied sharply on better than expected earnings; but it missed revenue consensus by 8.4%!!!

The following table from Bloomberg shows the incongruity of earnings and revenues.

Bloomberg Data: Caterpillar Inc reported quarterly results for the period ended June 30, 2009. The following table displays earnings figures along with Bloomberg consensus mean estimates. Actual values may differ from those included in company reports to make them comparable. All numbers are in millions of dollars except for per-share earnings, quoted in dollars.

Actual   Estimates     # Estimates      % Surprise
6/30/09        6/30/09           6/30/09         6/30/09
Sales                    7975.000      8703.400            15                -8.4%
Net Income Adjusted      445.376    147.909          11          201.1%
EPS Adjusted                     .720               .215             20          234.9%

CAT beat earnings by curtailing capex and vicious cost cutting in jobs and salaries.  Call this the Paradox of Corporate Cost Cutting – it’s good for the individual company but not for the aggregate economy.

The buzz word on Tuesday was ‘stabilization’.  Bernanke told the House Finance Services Committee that the economy is showing “tentative signs of stabilization.”

This was spun by fin media types and pundits as good news.  What happened to ‘green shoots’?  Isn’t ‘green shoots’ a more bullish condition that ‘stabilization’?  One Bubblevision commentator kept averring that ‘stabilization’of the economy is the reason for the stock market rally.  But the stock market is not priced for ‘stabilization’; it is priced for a roaring recovery…UTX CFO Hayes said 2010 profit growth cost-action led”

Caterpillar said it could lose money in Q3 and close a significant number of factories on a rolling basis. But CEO Jim Owens believes the economy will recover in Q4, so he upped full-year guidance. Owens also uttered ‘stabilization’. A Q3 loss, rolling factory closings, capex curtailment and suspension of stock buybacks are not stabilization let alone green shoots.

By the way, someone knew about CAT’s earnings on Monday because the stock gapped higher and traded sideways without retreat for the remainder of the session…CAT gapped again on Tuesday’s open.

Death & Taxes

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 22nd, 2009, 9:00AM

Jess Bachman, who did some of the fantastic charts and graphics in Bailout Nation, is out with his annual look at the Federal Budget:

Death and Taxes” is a large representational graph and poster of the federal budget. It contains over 500 programs and departments and almost every program that receives over 200 million dollars annually. The data is straight from the president’s 2009 budget request and will be debated, amended, and approved by Congress to begin the fiscal year. All of the item circles are proportional in size to their spending totals and the percentage change from 2008 is included to spot trends and disproportion.

This one is a humdinger:

>


Courtesy of Jess Bachman, Wall Stats

>

Jess has offered TBP readers a discount: Enter the code “BigPicture” during checkout and you will get 50% off 2 or more posters.

>

Source:
The Art of Information
http://www.WallStats.com

Blog
http://www.WallStats.com/blog

Flash Trading’s Dark Volumes

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 22nd, 2009, 7:34AM

Be sure to read the July Trader Magazine’s article on algorthmic flash trading, a/k/a front running:

Flash orders are also called “step up” or “pre-routing display” orders. The rationale for these order types is simple: Better me than you. They allow a venue to execute marketable orders in-house when that market is not at the national best bid or offer, instead of routing those orders to rival markets. They do this by briefly displaying information about the order to the venue’s participants and soliciting NBBO-priced responses. If there are no responses, the order can be canceled or routed to the market with the best price.

All four markets with flash orders treat these orders in a similar way. If they get a marketable buy order, for instance, that would otherwise be routed to a market quoting at the NBBO, they flash the order to some or all of their participants as a bid at the same price as the national best offer. Exactly who sees the flash, how that information is conveyed and the duration of the flash vary by market. The maximum allowable time for a flash is 500 milliseconds, or half a second, although most of the markets flash routable orders for under 30 milliseconds.

The details are worth a few minutes of your time.


Hat tip Bill King

>

Source:
Flash PointEquities industry clashes over flash and step-up orders
Nina Mehta
Traders Magazine, July 2009

http://www.tradersmagazine.com/issues/20_296/-103978-1.html

Bernanke Campaigns for Reappointment

Email this post Print this post
By Jack McHugh - July 22nd, 2009, 2:02AM

Good Evening: Stocks were poised to correct their recent gains today, but a late rally extended the winning streak for both the Dow and NASDAQ to seven straight. The earnings news was deemed positive by market participants, though the bottom line “beats” came even as top line revenue estimates fell short. Cost cutting can always flatter the profit figures in the short run, but mass layoffs, deferred capital expenditures, and jiggered tax rates are not what creates either prosperity or long term wealth. Perhaps business executives are taking these actions in the hope the Fed’s aggressive monetary policies can restart the economy, save their careers, and prevent their stock options from expiring worthless, but Mr. Bernanke himself is fighting for his job these days.

With no economic releases on tap today, our index futures markets relied upon earnings releases to guide trading prior to the open in New York. Caterpillar, Texas Instruments, DuPont, UnitedHealth, and Freeport-McMoran all reported positive surprises to one degree or another, though most required financial gymnastics to achieve these “beats”. For all but FCX, revenues came in on the light side. Such a divergence between revenue and profits will be hard to sustain, but who knows? IBM has been managing to pull off this same trick for years, and investors have rarely put the stock in the penalty box for it.

CIT has certainly been penalized of late, though, and today brought word the company’s privately funded recap is in doubt (see below). Reported as a virtual certainty only yesterday, the deal looked less than done today. Fresh concerns about CIT helped cause the stock market to retrace its opening gains of 0.5% or so. CAT helped the Dow remain aloft, but the rest of the tape fell in for a bit of profit taking. Most of the major averages were down some 1% at mid day when stocks began to recover. Acting as if few investors wanted to be short ahead of Apple’s earnings release this evening, the whole tape healed by the time the closing bell rang.

The Dow’s 0.75% gain led the way, while the Dow Transports lagged with a loss of equal measure. Treasurys were on the strong side, with yields falling between 6 and 12 bps. The yield on the benchmark 10 year note is now once again below 3.5%. The dollar was on the lethargic side, with smallish early losses giving way to smallish gains later in the day. Commodities followed stocks to the downside early on, but, unlike equities, they never really recovered. Pulled down by losses in the grain complex, the CRB index gave back 0.5% on Tuesday.

The 2010 campaign season kicked off today, and I’m not referring to the folks in Congress who constantly seem to be running for office. No, the race for high office I refer to is the one for the Chairmanship of the Federal Reserve System. Ben Bernanke may occupy the corner office in the Eccles building right now, but others covet his job. Perhaps sensing the brewing competition, Chairman Bernanke fired off a pre-emptive salvo in the press prior to his semi-annual testimony on monetary policy before Congress today (see below). He wanted to reassure long bond investors that, cross his heart, the Fed would tighten policy at the “appropriate time”. Not content that politicians can read, the Chairman then trudged to the Hill and took to the microphone. He tried to strike a balance between caution (downside risks remain) and optimism (tentative signs of recovery). He even tried to claim his share of credit for the receding financial crisis.

“Aggressive policy actions taken around the world last fall may well have averted the collapse of the global financial system,” he said. “Many of the improvements in financial conditions can be traced, in part, to policy actions taken by the Federal Reserve.” (source: Bernanke testimony before Congress)

Unmentioned, of course, was the Fed’s role (mostly under Greenspan) in fostering the credit bubble that later froze the credit markets, but Mr. Bernanke was not shy in saying the Fed’s monetary blowtorches were responsible for the thaw now under way. For this professorial man to strut, even a little, in front of elected officials and the media must mean he feels his job is on the line. As a Bush appointee, Bernanke knows he represents anything but the type of change promised by the Obama administration.

Bernanke knows who wants the keys to his office, too. One is Janet Yellen, and another is Larry Summers. I have no great love for Mr. Bernanke, but it’s probably fair to say that his tenure at the Fed has been marked more by trying to clean up messes than it has been marred by creating them. Neither of his main contenders can make such a claim; if anything, they’ve been part of the problem. Summers would be an especially poor choice, since he would be viewed as politicizing the Fed. Knowing that Bernanke would be on the Hill today, for example, Summers took the airwaves in a thinly veiled attempt to stay relevant (see below).

As the junior member of the famous troika on the late ’90′s Time Magazine cover, “The Committee to Save the World”, Summers is the only one of the three not (as yet) to have scorn heaped upon him. Greenspan has been unmasked as a disgrace, and Citigroup shareholders silently curse Rubin for his poor stewardship. I guess Summers wants his friend, President Obama, to give him a shot at redemption after some of his policies as Treasury Secretary under Clinton came a cropper during the credit crackup. Summers would be anything but “change we can believe in”, but his appointment would have some redeeming value. It would allow him to join the other “Committee to Save the World” members in validating the Time Magazine cover jinx. What happened to Greenspan, Rubin, and, to some extent, Summers after that cover came out is a fitting reminder that when someone tells you they want to save the world, just politely turn them down. History is littered with examples of well meaning people who did a lot of damage to the world in the name of saving it.

– Jack McHugh

U.S. Stocks Advance on Caterpillar Earnings, Bernanke Remarks
CIT Expects Loss of $1.5 Billion, May Seek Bankruptcy
The Fed’s Exit Strategy, by Ben Bernanke
Summers Urges Banks to Lend More, Says Growth Pace ‘in Doubt’

Vancouver . . .

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 21st, 2009, 11:30PM

Lovely town!

Nice parks, outdoor cafes, plenty of tourists walking about.

Flew in on an Air Canada 767 (great sleeper seats), got from the airport to downtown rather quickly during rush hour. The Fairmont hotel is quite nice, so far, the local restaurants  are very good (Azia).

I am trying to figure out what town Vancouver reminds me of: Geographically, nestled between the harbour and the mountains, there are some similarities to Hong Kong. But the density and energy are very different. Its very clean, tidy, looks rather affluent — not much of a recession here.

There is a touch of Los Angeles here, a little Chicago, some Montreal — but I cannot really hone in on what it is most similar to…

Video for Spontaneous Crowd Chorus

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 21st, 2009, 7:00PM

You may remember the Spontaneous Crowd Chorus I mentioned last week after the McCartney Concert?

Someone actually found a video clip on YouTube!

~~~

Stop and think about what this means — there is hardly a moment of our daily lives when some recording device isn’t rolling . . .

43 queries. 1.048 seconds.