<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unemployment Measures; Job Losses (%) Post-WWII Recessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:00:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: This Time It's Different - Gold Speculator</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-190055</link>
		<dc:creator>This Time It's Different - Gold Speculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-190055</guid>
		<description>[...] following chart:    The chart is compliments of Chart of the Day.   There is another graphic on a post by Barry Ritholtz (The Big Picture) which is not nearly as pretty, but shows that the current [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following chart:    The chart is compliments of Chart of the Day.   There is another graphic on a post by Barry Ritholtz (The Big Picture) which is not nearly as pretty, but shows that the current [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flipjes</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189599</link>
		<dc:creator>flipjes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189599</guid>
		<description>These graphs could really use the &#039;29 crash for comparison, to show that things are -in some ways- completely different now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These graphs could really use the &#8216;29 crash for comparison, to show that things are -in some ways- completely different now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189584</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189584</guid>
		<description>The FDIC took over 7 (that&#039;s right SEVEN) banks today. Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDIC took over 7 (that&#8217;s right SEVEN) banks today. Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189565</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189565</guid>
		<description>I think I saw a gingham swan at the lake today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhrqBOSazzA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I saw a gingham swan at the lake today.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhrqBOSazzA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhrqBOSazzA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189558</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189558</guid>
		<description>&quot;raft&quot; of bank closures takes total over 50...still awaiting  more from the western timezones - didn&#039;t see a final body count yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;raft&#8221; of bank closures takes total over 50&#8230;still awaiting  more from the western timezones &#8211; didn&#8217;t see a final body count yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189538</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189538</guid>
		<description>ahab

Besides it would be much too easy if we just stayed in a predictable range so traders could buy the bottom and sell the top.  It&#039;s never that easy for very long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahab</p>
<p>Besides it would be much too easy if we just stayed in a predictable range so traders could buy the bottom and sell the top.  It&#8217;s never that easy for very long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189524</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189524</guid>
		<description>onlooker-

I opined earlier- that if I was a money manager- I would sell now- and lock in my profits- ahead of earnings which are bound to be less than pretty- 

however- I still wonder if there will be hesitancy to sell with earnings in the next few weeks-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>onlooker-</p>
<p>I opined earlier- that if I was a money manager- I would sell now- and lock in my profits- ahead of earnings which are bound to be less than pretty- </p>
<p>however- I still wonder if there will be hesitancy to sell with earnings in the next few weeks-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189523</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189523</guid>
		<description>andy-

I am already a fan-  and a subscriber-  

I was throwing out a possible range-  but let&#039;s say the range then is 890- 940- more plausible?- also-i am getting the impression that you are expecting a selloff sooner rather then later?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andy-</p>
<p>I am already a fan-  and a subscriber-  </p>
<p>I was throwing out a possible range-  but let&#8217;s say the range then is 890- 940- more plausible?- also-i am getting the impression that you are expecting a selloff sooner rather then later?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189522</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189522</guid>
		<description>ahab

And remember, we&#039;re still in a bear market so unless there&#039;s something real substantial to grab onto after this big rally the tendency is for the market to &quot;retest&quot; the lows to pick up more committed buyers at lower levels and give the economy some more time to heal and start giving some positive signs again.  It seems that the market doesn&#039;t like to grind sideways in a such a tight range for very long, especially in such uncertain times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahab</p>
<p>And remember, we&#8217;re still in a bear market so unless there&#8217;s something real substantial to grab onto after this big rally the tendency is for the market to &#8220;retest&#8221; the lows to pick up more committed buyers at lower levels and give the economy some more time to heal and start giving some positive signs again.  It seems that the market doesn&#8217;t like to grind sideways in a such a tight range for very long, especially in such uncertain times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy T</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/percentage-job-losses-post-wwii-recessions/comment-page-3/#comment-189519</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=30810#comment-189519</guid>
		<description>ahab.  I guess almost anything is possible, but if the SP500 breaks 888, it&#039;ll look very, very bad from my technical perspective.  It already looks bad, but for me a break of 888 would cement the case for a trip to 750-800 zone.  There are a few commenters/readers here who get my occasional technical commentary on markets.  If  you have any interest, just send me a note to AndysTechnicals@gmail.com and I&#039;ll put you on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahab.  I guess almost anything is possible, but if the SP500 breaks 888, it&#8217;ll look very, very bad from my technical perspective.  It already looks bad, but for me a break of 888 would cement the case for a trip to 750-800 zone.  There are a few commenters/readers here who get my occasional technical commentary on markets.  If  you have any interest, just send me a note to <a href="mailto:AndysTechnicals@gmail.com">AndysTechnicals@gmail.com</a> and I&#8217;ll put you on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
