<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rail Time Indicators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: end of the beginning &#124; the rational post</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-198190</link>
		<dc:creator>end of the beginning &#124; the rational post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-198190</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; from housing surpluses and underemployment figures to bankruptcy filings and dismal freight traffic &#8211; suggest that any recent industrial production is more a function of the inventory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; from housing surpluses and underemployment figures to bankruptcy filings and dismal freight traffic &#8211; suggest that any recent industrial production is more a function of the inventory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which Are the Credible Industry Trade Groups? &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197805</link>
		<dc:creator>Which Are the Credible Industry Trade Groups? &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197805</guid>
		<description>[...] Sunday, I mentioned the Association of American Railroads “Rail Time Indicators.&#8221; It was not showing any green [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sunday, I mentioned the Association of American Railroads “Rail Time Indicators.&#8221; It was not showing any green [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvienne</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197438</link>
		<dc:creator>cvienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197438</guid>
		<description>@Okie Lawyer

&quot;As for the increase in coal, who is buying it and for what purpose?&quot;

I hear that Santa Claus is buying up tons of coal...So he can put a lump of it in everyone&#039;s stocking this Christmas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Okie Lawyer</p>
<p>&#8220;As for the increase in coal, who is buying it and for what purpose?&#8221;</p>
<p>I hear that Santa Claus is buying up tons of coal&#8230;So he can put a lump of it in everyone&#8217;s stocking this Christmas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rail Time Indicators &#171; NWO News</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197293</link>
		<dc:creator>Rail Time Indicators &#171; NWO News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197293</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Linkfest &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197256</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Linkfest &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197256</guid>
		<description>[...] Association of American Railroads has begun publishing “Rail Time Indicators,” their monthly look at Rail Transport related data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Association of American Railroads has begun publishing “Rail Time Indicators,” their monthly look at Rail Transport related data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OkieLawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197243</link>
		<dc:creator>OkieLawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197243</guid>
		<description>I have a question: considering that most construction is going to take place during the summertime (when it is warm and clear enough to build), wouldn&#039;t a lot of this activity just be noise?

As for the increase in coal, who is buying it and for what purpose?

When I called into work this last Tuesday, they indicated that some projects are at least being talked about and that I might get back to work &quot;soon.&quot;  So, I am willing to accept that maybe there may be some economic activity on the horizon.  Is anyone else hearing anything significant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question: considering that most construction is going to take place during the summertime (when it is warm and clear enough to build), wouldn&#8217;t a lot of this activity just be noise?</p>
<p>As for the increase in coal, who is buying it and for what purpose?</p>
<p>When I called into work this last Tuesday, they indicated that some projects are at least being talked about and that I might get back to work &#8220;soon.&#8221;  So, I am willing to accept that maybe there may be some economic activity on the horizon.  Is anyone else hearing anything significant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHB</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197242</link>
		<dc:creator>DHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197242</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that demand for coal transport, a major component of the data presented, is being influenced by new supplies of natural gas from U.S. shale projects.  This surge of lower cost natural gas is changing utility behavior, and influencing coal demand.  The impact shows up in rail data.  It represents a change of fuel being consumed, not a dramatic economic decline.  Something to consider before looking at this data and making broad claims about the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that demand for coal transport, a major component of the data presented, is being influenced by new supplies of natural gas from U.S. shale projects.  This surge of lower cost natural gas is changing utility behavior, and influencing coal demand.  The impact shows up in rail data.  It represents a change of fuel being consumed, not a dramatic economic decline.  Something to consider before looking at this data and making broad claims about the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VennData</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197236</link>
		<dc:creator>VennData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197236</guid>
		<description>Barron&#039;s Jim McTague does a nice job...

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124847536976580233.html

&quot;...that average weekly U.S. rail carloads headed up in June for the first time all year, from 249,000 in May, to 260,000. Coal shipments increased nearly 6% month-over-month to 125,000 carloads...&quot;

&quot;...intermodal traffic, which is largely consumer goods in trailers and shipping containers riding on flat cars, went from about 181,000 carloads to 189,000...&quot;

&quot;...Carloads of crushed stone, sand and gravel rose from about 15,000 cars to 16,000 cars...&quot;

&quot;...Daniel Keen, who is vice president of policy analysis...  Keen wasn&#039;t willing to dismiss my optimistic reading [in spite of the negative annual numbers ] of the June data out-of-hand, saying that the increases for the month could be positive...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barron&#8217;s Jim McTague does a nice job&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124847536976580233.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124847536976580233.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;that average weekly U.S. rail carloads headed up in June for the first time all year, from 249,000 in May, to 260,000. Coal shipments increased nearly 6% month-over-month to 125,000 carloads&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;intermodal traffic, which is largely consumer goods in trailers and shipping containers riding on flat cars, went from about 181,000 carloads to 189,000&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Carloads of crushed stone, sand and gravel rose from about 15,000 cars to 16,000 cars&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Daniel Keen, who is vice president of policy analysis&#8230;  Keen wasn&#8217;t willing to dismiss my optimistic reading [in spite of the negative annual numbers ] of the June data out-of-hand, saying that the increases for the month could be positive&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead hobo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197233</link>
		<dc:creator>dead hobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197233</guid>
		<description>EricTyson Says:
July 25th, 2009 at 10:10 pm

Interesting Barry - perhaps they don’t spin because low utilization = better bargains for shippers which the assocation has a vested interest in getting the word out about…

reply:
---------------
You are correct. Just as low sales at retail create massive savings for customers (not so good for employees, though)

You are correct. Just as low auto sales  create massive savings for customers (not so good for employees, though)

You are correct. Just as low home sales create massive savings  for buyers (not so good for people who build houses or make things that go into them, though)

You are correct. Just as low discretionary spending create massive savings for customers who used to buy for recreation (not so good for employees, though)

Thankfully, you have a stupendous stock market pump in progress ,thanks to excess cash liquidity, really great computers, massive front running volume, a do nothing and totally disinterested SEC, and complicit exchanges. Don&#039;t be the last buyer in, though, when excess volume is forced to leave someday. All it will take 1s an uptick rule or the end of flash trading. HA HA on you. 

I&#039;ve never read one of your books. Do they all sound as insightful as the above comment you wrote? Are you sure you&#039;re not really F411?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EricTyson Says:<br />
July 25th, 2009 at 10:10 pm</p>
<p>Interesting Barry &#8211; perhaps they don’t spin because low utilization = better bargains for shippers which the assocation has a vested interest in getting the word out about…</p>
<p>reply:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
You are correct. Just as low sales at retail create massive savings for customers (not so good for employees, though)</p>
<p>You are correct. Just as low auto sales  create massive savings for customers (not so good for employees, though)</p>
<p>You are correct. Just as low home sales create massive savings  for buyers (not so good for people who build houses or make things that go into them, though)</p>
<p>You are correct. Just as low discretionary spending create massive savings for customers who used to buy for recreation (not so good for employees, though)</p>
<p>Thankfully, you have a stupendous stock market pump in progress ,thanks to excess cash liquidity, really great computers, massive front running volume, a do nothing and totally disinterested SEC, and complicit exchanges. Don&#8217;t be the last buyer in, though, when excess volume is forced to leave someday. All it will take 1s an uptick rule or the end of flash trading. HA HA on you. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never read one of your books. Do they all sound as insightful as the above comment you wrote? Are you sure you&#8217;re not really F411?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrabandista13</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/rail-time-indicators/comment-page-1/#comment-197228</link>
		<dc:creator>contrabandista13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=33389#comment-197228</guid>
		<description>OT:

I know that this is off topic, however, I thought that Geithner fans might find this interesting.....

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/

SUNDAY JULY 26, 2009 08:27 EDT

The war being waged on the TARP watchdog&#039;s independence

&quot;...Barofksy&#039;s clashes with administration officials have intensified of late.  Last week, he issued a report documenting that the actual amount of taxpayer money theoretically put at risk in the bank bailout -- once Federal Reserve, FDIC and other programs are counted -- is $23.7 trillion, not the widely cited figure of $700 billion, a report that prompted attacks from the White House and Treasury on his credibility....&quot;

&quot;...Jake Tapper conducted a 20-minute podcast interview with Barofsky, and I really recommend that everyone listen to it (it can be heard by clicking PLAY on the recorder below or can be downloaded here)....&quot;

Best regards,

Econolicious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT:</p>
<p>I know that this is off topic, however, I thought that Geithner fans might find this interesting&#8230;..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/</a></p>
<p>SUNDAY JULY 26, 2009 08:27 EDT</p>
<p>The war being waged on the TARP watchdog&#8217;s independence</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Barofksy&#8217;s clashes with administration officials have intensified of late.  Last week, he issued a report documenting that the actual amount of taxpayer money theoretically put at risk in the bank bailout &#8212; once Federal Reserve, FDIC and other programs are counted &#8212; is $23.7 trillion, not the widely cited figure of $700 billion, a report that prompted attacks from the White House and Treasury on his credibility&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Jake Tapper conducted a 20-minute podcast interview with Barofsky, and I really recommend that everyone listen to it (it can be heard by clicking PLAY on the recorder below or can be downloaded here)&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Econolicious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

