<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Regulate!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:25:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thales</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192628</link>
		<dc:creator>thales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192628</guid>
		<description>Yes, business self-regulation is toxic. But government regulation is considerably more toxic.

Business is tricky, and self regulation will fail occasionally. The results are rarely as fatal or permanent as depicted in the cartoon. After the game collapses, the players pick up the remnants of their chips and start a new game. Business failure is a normal part of reallocation of resources in a healthy economy. And the game is voluntary. Nobody ever coerced me to buy into AIG or GM or Countrywide. At least until the government got involved.

But when the government involves itself, the game becomes involuntary. If I don&#039;t pay my taxes I can go to jail. As a taxpayer, I am involuntarily invested. The government, in all its wisdom and glory, uses my tax dollars to regulate inefficiently and irrationally in a way that is pleasing to politically powerful people. The government&#039;s goal is not prosperity, or efficiency, or justice, but control. When businesses fail, the government uses tax money to subsidize them. The players cannot pick up their chips and start a new game. The government forces them to stay in an ever more decrepit game that needs ever greater subsidies and wastes ever more resources.

Just as politicians can be counted on to argue eloquently and persistently for ever larger and more powerful government, so can their regulators be counted on to develop ever larger, more complicated, more impenetrable, more unrealistic regulations that will cause ever more inefficiency, waste and failure, requiring, in turn, ever greater subsidies.

As Ronald Reagan said, &quot;If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it quits moving, subsidize it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, business self-regulation is toxic. But government regulation is considerably more toxic.</p>
<p>Business is tricky, and self regulation will fail occasionally. The results are rarely as fatal or permanent as depicted in the cartoon. After the game collapses, the players pick up the remnants of their chips and start a new game. Business failure is a normal part of reallocation of resources in a healthy economy. And the game is voluntary. Nobody ever coerced me to buy into AIG or GM or Countrywide. At least until the government got involved.</p>
<p>But when the government involves itself, the game becomes involuntary. If I don&#8217;t pay my taxes I can go to jail. As a taxpayer, I am involuntarily invested. The government, in all its wisdom and glory, uses my tax dollars to regulate inefficiently and irrationally in a way that is pleasing to politically powerful people. The government&#8217;s goal is not prosperity, or efficiency, or justice, but control. When businesses fail, the government uses tax money to subsidize them. The players cannot pick up their chips and start a new game. The government forces them to stay in an ever more decrepit game that needs ever greater subsidies and wastes ever more resources.</p>
<p>Just as politicians can be counted on to argue eloquently and persistently for ever larger and more powerful government, so can their regulators be counted on to develop ever larger, more complicated, more impenetrable, more unrealistic regulations that will cause ever more inefficiency, waste and failure, requiring, in turn, ever greater subsidies.</p>
<p>As Ronald Reagan said, &#8220;If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it quits moving, subsidize it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graphite</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192501</link>
		<dc:creator>Graphite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192501</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We haven’t evolved yet to resist ... unfunded tax cuts&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s the unfunded spending we can&#039;t resist. A chicken in every pot and a car in every driveway, all on &quot;some guy making more than me in the next county&quot;? HELL YES, we can!

Even John Kenneth Galbraith questioned the idea that the periodic inability of business to &quot;regulate&quot; itself meant that we should expect better results from government overseers. The utter failures of the SEC, FDIC, OFHEO, et al show that he was absolutely right, but of course that is a lesson that Barry &amp; Co. insist cannot be drawn from what has happened. After a calamity where both private businesses &amp; government regulators utterly failed in their duties, we are supposed to draw pessimistic conclusions only about the former and not the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We haven’t evolved yet to resist &#8230; unfunded tax cuts</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the unfunded spending we can&#8217;t resist. A chicken in every pot and a car in every driveway, all on &#8220;some guy making more than me in the next county&#8221;? HELL YES, we can!</p>
<p>Even John Kenneth Galbraith questioned the idea that the periodic inability of business to &#8220;regulate&#8221; itself meant that we should expect better results from government overseers. The utter failures of the SEC, FDIC, OFHEO, et al show that he was absolutely right, but of course that is a lesson that Barry &amp; Co. insist cannot be drawn from what has happened. After a calamity where both private businesses &amp; government regulators utterly failed in their duties, we are supposed to draw pessimistic conclusions only about the former and not the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston Munn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192324</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192324</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that we expected genuine businesses to regulate themselves - we gave check kiters our account number, unlimited credit access, and AAA bond ratings and then we expected that without supervision we would get a positive return on the investment, pay off the national debt, and and then with the excess profits we could afford to spread American-excesses-loving-democracy-by-military-force inspiration to every oil-rich country in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that we expected genuine businesses to regulate themselves &#8211; we gave check kiters our account number, unlimited credit access, and AAA bond ratings and then we expected that without supervision we would get a positive return on the investment, pay off the national debt, and and then with the excess profits we could afford to spread American-excesses-loving-democracy-by-military-force inspiration to every oil-rich country in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192282</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192282</guid>
		<description>Self-Regulation.....Flatulation....What&#039;s the difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-Regulation&#8230;..Flatulation&#8230;.What&#8217;s the difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfred e</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192261</link>
		<dc:creator>alfred e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192261</guid>
		<description>@wunsacon: Too cool.  Too correct.

&quot;Some of us expect too much from our species. Just a few million years ago, we stopped flinging our poo. &quot; 

Were you specifically talking about FOX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wunsacon: Too cool.  Too correct.</p>
<p>&#8220;Some of us expect too much from our species. Just a few million years ago, we stopped flinging our poo. &#8221; </p>
<p>Were you specifically talking about FOX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192251</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192251</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;We haven’t evolved yet to resist junk food, ESPN, unfunded tax cuts, and option ARMs.&lt;/i&gt;

Which is why we invented  laws. Like for murder, theft, fraud. We wouldn&#039;t need a law and penalty prohibiting them if he had evolved past doing them. This is why the &quot;free market&quot; folks seem still lost in a Plasticman comic they read when they were 12.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We haven’t evolved yet to resist junk food, ESPN, unfunded tax cuts, and option ARMs.</i></p>
<p>Which is why we invented  laws. Like for murder, theft, fraud. We wouldn&#8217;t need a law and penalty prohibiting them if he had evolved past doing them. This is why the &#8220;free market&#8221; folks seem still lost in a Plasticman comic they read when they were 12.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvienne</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192250</link>
		<dc:creator>cvienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192250</guid>
		<description>@wunsacon

...and vote EARLY &amp; OFTEN I suspect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wunsacon</p>
<p>&#8230;and vote EARLY &amp; OFTEN I suspect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunsacon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192246</link>
		<dc:creator>wunsacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192246</guid>
		<description>Some of us expect too much from our species.  Just a few million years ago, we stopped flinging our poo.  We haven&#039;t evolved yet to resist junk food, ESPN, unfunded tax cuts, and option ARMs.

Let&#039;s not fret it though.  Cuz our robot masters will be better at all this.

http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_releases/science_literacy_american_adults_flunk_basic_science_says_survey


...
    * Only 53% of adults know how long it takes for the Earth to revolve around the Sun.
    * Only 59% of adults know that the earliest humans and dinosaurs did not live at the same time.
    * Only 47% of adults can roughly approximate the percent of the Earth&#039;s surface that is covered with water .(*)
    * Only 21% of adults answered all three questions correctly.
...


And these people vote!

(I can imagine a bumper sticker for these folks: &quot;I don&#039;t know s***... AND I VOTE!&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us expect too much from our species.  Just a few million years ago, we stopped flinging our poo.  We haven&#8217;t evolved yet to resist junk food, ESPN, unfunded tax cuts, and option ARMs.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not fret it though.  Cuz our robot masters will be better at all this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_releases/science_literacy_american_adults_flunk_basic_science_says_survey" rel="nofollow">http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_releases/science_literacy_american_adults_flunk_basic_science_says_survey</a></p>
<p>&#8230;<br />
    * Only 53% of adults know how long it takes for the Earth to revolve around the Sun.<br />
    * Only 59% of adults know that the earliest humans and dinosaurs did not live at the same time.<br />
    * Only 47% of adults can roughly approximate the percent of the Earth&#8217;s surface that is covered with water .(*)<br />
    * Only 21% of adults answered all three questions correctly.<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>And these people vote!</p>
<p>(I can imagine a bumper sticker for these folks: &#8220;I don&#8217;t know s***&#8230; AND I VOTE!&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192239</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192239</guid>
		<description>That psychological problem, I&#039;ve heard it&#039;s insanity, and I&#039;ve heard it&#039;s stupidity.  Maybe it&#039;s a little of both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That psychological problem, I&#8217;ve heard it&#8217;s insanity, and I&#8217;ve heard it&#8217;s stupidity.  Maybe it&#8217;s a little of both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/self-regulate/comment-page-1/#comment-192218</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31900#comment-192218</guid>
		<description>and we have our first bank failure
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/07/bank-failure-53-bank-of-wyoming.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and we have our first bank failure<br />
<a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/07/bank-failure-53-bank-of-wyoming.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/07/bank-failure-53-bank-of-wyoming.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
