<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S&amp;P500 vs CDs (1994-2008)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:55:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Risk and no return Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-201418</link>
		<dc:creator>Risk and no return Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-201418</guid>
		<description>[...] decade for stocks.&#8221;  Returns showed the broad stock market underperforming bonds and even CDs over decade-long time periods.  In short, it was fashionable to trash [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decade for stocks.&#8221;  Returns showed the broad stock market underperforming bonds and even CDs over decade-long time periods.  In short, it was fashionable to trash [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Investment Performance: CDs vs. Stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-195372</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Investment Performance: CDs vs. Stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-195372</guid>
		<description>[...] The Big Picture via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Big Picture via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chart Junkie: A Picture's Worth ... 7.17.09 &#124; Wall St. Cheat Sheet</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-194910</link>
		<dc:creator>Chart Junkie: A Picture's Worth ... 7.17.09 &#124; Wall St. Cheat Sheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-194910</guid>
		<description>[...] Macro-strategist Barry Ritholtz shows us that if you invested $10,000 in certificates of deposit in 1994, you would have more money than a friend who invested an equal $10,000 into the S&amp;P500 over the same time period. (Source: The Big Picture) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Macro-strategist Barry Ritholtz shows us that if you invested $10,000 in certificates of deposit in 1994, you would have more money than a friend who invested an equal $10,000 into the S&amp;P500 over the same time period. (Source: The Big Picture) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Appearance: The Kudlow Report &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-193032</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Appearance: The Kudlow Report &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-193032</guid>
		<description>[...] we have seen, CDs beat Stocks from 1994-2009, and Bonds outperformed stocks from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we have seen, CDs beat Stocks from 1994-2009, and Bonds outperformed stocks from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; CDs Investing Beating S&#38;P Investing, Since 1994</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-192724</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; CDs Investing Beating S&#38;P Investing, Since 1994</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-192724</guid>
		<description>[...] has beaten investing in the S&amp;P 500, including dividends, according to data collected by The Big Picture. Check out this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has beaten investing in the S&amp;P 500, including dividends, according to data collected by The Big Picture. Check out this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Stocks Always Best for the Long Run? - Gold Speculator</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-191039</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Stocks Always Best for the Long Run? - Gold Speculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-191039</guid>
		<description>[...] has a great graphic comparing the results of investing in two different vehicles on January 1, 1994 here. The graph is shown below:  This gives new meaning to the phrase: &quot;Cash is king.&quot; But this story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a great graphic comparing the results of investing in two different vehicles on January 1, 1994 here. The graph is shown below:  This gives new meaning to the phrase: &#8220;Cash is king.&#8221; But this story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secondary Sources: Global Crisis, Cash vs. Stocks, Who Pays Taxes &#124; Bizness Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-191029</link>
		<dc:creator>Secondary Sources: Global Crisis, Cash vs. Stocks, Who Pays Taxes &#124; Bizness Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-191029</guid>
		<description>[...] CDs vs. S&amp;P: Barry Ritholtz of the Big Picture makes an interesting investment comparison. &#8220;Imagine two people who added $10,000 to their investment accounts on January 1st, every year for the past 15 years. One of them is risk averse. They put the money into Certificates of Deposits, getting a few percentage points each year, but the principal is insured. The other is less risk averse; they put money into an S&amp;P500 Index each year. Who comes out ahead? CDs in 2009 yield 1% - 2%, as the market fell and then rally; if the S&amp;P doesn’t perform well for the rest of this year, CDs will have more gains again. As of March, Bonds had outperformed Stocks from 1968 to 2009 &#8212; 40 years.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CDs vs. S&amp;P: Barry Ritholtz of the Big Picture makes an interesting investment comparison. &#8220;Imagine two people who added $10,000 to their investment accounts on January 1st, every year for the past 15 years. One of them is risk averse. They put the money into Certificates of Deposits, getting a few percentage points each year, but the principal is insured. The other is less risk averse; they put money into an S&amp;P500 Index each year. Who comes out ahead? CDs in 2009 yield 1% &#8211; 2%, as the market fell and then rally; if the S&amp;P doesn’t perform well for the rest of this year, CDs will have more gains again. As of March, Bonds had outperformed Stocks from 1968 to 2009 &#8212; 40 years.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secondary Sources: Global Crisis, Cash vs. Stocks, Who Pays Taxes - Real Time Economics - WSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-191020</link>
		<dc:creator>Secondary Sources: Global Crisis, Cash vs. Stocks, Who Pays Taxes - Real Time Economics - WSJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-191020</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-190990</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-190990</guid>
		<description>@Erik, 

I have heard of Neely but never really read any of his stuff. I&#039;m going to check him out, thanks much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Erik, </p>
<p>I have heard of Neely but never really read any of his stuff. I&#8217;m going to check him out, thanks much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric K</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/07/sp500-vs-cds-1994-2008/comment-page-3/#comment-190942</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=31297#comment-190942</guid>
		<description>Andy was the one who sent me this press release from Neely:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/06/prweb2537224.htm

I noticed last December that once SPX broke down below 1000 in June 2002, it didn&#039;t get above 965 until June 2003 -- the Aug 02 high was 962 and the Dec 02 high was 950.  That&#039;s what made me expect we&#039;d sell off from the Jan highs.  Like 2008, 2002, 2001, and 2000, I think the market will move sideways until September and then sell off hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy was the one who sent me this press release from Neely:<br />
<a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/06/prweb2537224.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/06/prweb2537224.htm</a></p>
<p>I noticed last December that once SPX broke down below 1000 in June 2002, it didn&#8217;t get above 965 until June 2003 &#8212; the Aug 02 high was 962 and the Dec 02 high was 950.  That&#8217;s what made me expect we&#8217;d sell off from the Jan highs.  Like 2008, 2002, 2001, and 2000, I think the market will move sideways until September and then sell off hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
