The Real History of the Markets

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 13th, 2009, 9:19PM

Discussing whether stocks are the best bet or a sucker’s bet, with Barry Ritholtz, Fusion IQ CEO/director, equity research and Jeremy Siegel, Wharton finance professor.

13 Responses to “The Real History of the Markets”

  1. Media Appearance: The Kudlow Report | The Big Picture Says:

    [...] « CNBC: Blog Blog Blog The Real History of the Markets [...]

  2. matt Says:

    “I think Treasury Bonds are the toxic assets of the next decade.”

    Wow.

  3. jc Says:

    Kudlow obviously has a hearing problem. 50 year bull market, he’s back on drugs!

  4. R.D. Says:

    Kudlow,Kniel, Siegel,………………… disinformation.

  5. investorinpa Says:

    Barry, congrats on not asking Siegel how that ETF company he endorsed is doing….you could have seriously called him out and made him cry himself to sleep!

  6. David Yaseen Says:

    I’m embarrassed for my country. Such blatant misdirection. I don’t know why you put up with it, Barry. We’ve got your back.

  7. patrick_g Says:

    Siegel is fighting the wrong battle. Why is it, despite ubiquitous and cheap computation and communications, that transaction costs can kill you? Why is it that it can cost a retail investor $10,$20,$30 PER TRADE? It’s CRAZY. It should cost pennies. Another example of the banksters distorting markets by using their power and privilege to jack-up transaction costs.

  8. sabbadoo32 Says:

    Funniest line:

    Rithotz: “Can I tell you something?”

    Kudlow: (ignores, blathers on)

  9. kburke Says:

    Barry,
    How are you invested?

    Kevin

  10. GB Says:

    At the very least if you got people to think about bear bull cycles and stop losses and retirement you did a good job. Good info Barry, keep it coming.

  11. Steve Barry Says:

    Siegel is officially a quack who must be ignored. He claims that starting at low interest rates and reasonable valuations, you have a winning market.

    With rates low, that is the worst time to own stocks, as rates will likely be rising…ESPECIALLY IF YOU STATE ONE MINUTE EARLIER THAT TREASURIES ARE TOXIC ASSETS.

    And a P/E of 130, going to 1800, is not exactly reasonable…in fact, I call it INSANE.

  12. Breakfast Links: « The Reformed Broker Says:

    [...] Larry Kudlow hosted a debate between Prof Jeremy Siegel and Barry Ritholtz about Buy and Hold.  (TBP) [...]

  13. damo Says:

    Good to see you fighting the good fight!

    I have some sympathy for the view that stocks are a better investment at the moment, but Barry I think you could have nailed him more on the point that if you bought stocks 18 months ago or even 8 years ago prior to the tech wreck that you would have done disastrously.

    The important lesson is that no asset is a good investment if bought at the wrong price, so to tell people to always buy stocks (at any price seems to be his thesis) is a recipe for disaster.