Thursday Reading

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 9th, 2009, 3:11PM

All good stuff:

A law to tame wild bankers (Guardian)

All of the jobs created in the US this century have been lost (Econbrowser)

Economists Oppose More Stimulus (WSJ)

Shipping industry in deep water (Los Angeles Times) see also Shipping flashes early warning signals again (Telegraph)

Capacity Utilization vs. Inflation

No Rest for the Wealthy (NYT)

Manhattan Rents Decline as Unemployment Cuts Demand (Bloomberg)

Advice from an Economist Who Saw 1929 (Time)

It’s time retailers quit showering us with weather excuses (Marketwatch)

Did I miss anything good today? Please use the comments . . .

34 Responses to “Thursday Reading”

  1. constantnormal Says:

    Any readers live near Kansas City, MO and planning to attend? I’m sure that there are a lotta questions the rest of us would like to suggest …

  2. constantnormal Says:

    that was in reference to the Bernanke town hall meeting (which seems to have suddenly dropped off the list)

  3. Onlooker from Troy Says:

    Excellent commentary on retailers’ weather excuses at Marketwatch. It read like a blog post! Telling it like it is and calling them out.

  4. Onlooker from Troy Says:

    Addendum to my previous post:

    One thing he neglected in his last paragraph as true causal factors is the huge debt burden that was partly created by excessive, conspicuous consumption at those very retailers. And that they overbuilt their businesses/sector betting on the endless continuation of that unsustainable trend.

    But other than that, nice pointed remarks.

  5. karen Says:

    another manhattan rental link:

    http://curbed.com/archives/2009/07/09/market_reports_number_of_manhattan_rentals_cut_in_half.php

  6. VennData Says:

    Film About Little Guy Battling Huge, Morally Bankrupt Organization Made By Huge, Morally Bankrupt Organization

    http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/film_about_little_guy?utm_source=b-section

  7. leftback Says:

    Thanks for the link, Karen, LB needs to hit the streets again in August to find a new domicile large enough to accommodate Schadenfreude Asset Management’s enhanced trading desk and enlarged asset base. Sounds like there may be some bargains out there in Manhattan rentals – plus there is that hole in the kitchen ceiling…..

  8. goatdog Says:

    Did you miss this

    William White, a Canadian, worked for various central banks for 39 years, most recently serving as chief economist for the central bank for all central bankers, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), headquartered in Basel, Switzerland………………….

    It was August 2003
    The Jackson Hole paper was an assault on everything Greenspan had preached and, as everyone knew, he was not fond of being contradicted. Other members of the audience glanced surreptitiously at the Maestro to gauge his reaction. Greenspan remained impassive, his face expressionless behind his large spectacles, as he listened to White. Later, during a more relaxed get-together, he refused to even look at White………….

    The Fed chairman was not even impressed by a letter the Mortgage Insurance Companies of America (MICA), a trade association of US mortgage providers, sent to the Fed on Sept. 23, 2005. In the letter, MICA warned that it was “very concerned” about some of the risky lending practices being applied in the US real estate market. The experts even speculated that the Fed might be operating on the basis of incorrect data. Despite a sharp increase in mortgages being approved for low-income borrowers, most banks were reporting to the Fed that they had not lowered their lending standards. According to a study MICA cited entitled “This Powder Keg Is Going to Blow,” there was no secondary market for these “nuclear mortgages.”…………………………

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,635051,00.html

  9. Transor Z Says:

    Apologies for losing it (temper, not reason) on the Federal Reserve Independence Kohn prepared statement post. But when I actually read the example of independent central bank studies he alluded to, well . . .

  10. Mark E Hoffer Says:

    EU finds drug firms make billions stalling genericsIan Traynor in Brussels
    July 10, 2009
    EUROPEAN patients, taxpayers and national treasuries are being fleeced of billions of euros because of the big pharmaceutical companies’ elaborate campaigns to delay the marketing of cheaper generic drugs, the European Commission says.

    “There is something rotten in the state [of the pharmaceutical industry],” said Neelie Kroes, the Competition Commissioner, unveiling the findings of an 18-month inquiry. “Makers of original medicines are actively trying to delay the entry of generic medicines on to their markets.”…

    http://www.smh.com.au/world/eu-finds-drug-firms-make-billions-stalling-generics-20090709-desm.html

  11. I-Man Says:

    “CIT Debt Plunges on Bets Lender Isn’t Too Big to Fail”

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=amnabnhMuPmc

    “Shaw Cuts 2009 Forecast After Quarterly Profit Falls ”

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=a_qFoX1.i2po

  12. I-Man Says:

    This one too:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/31829337

    And the pic on drudge of Obama and Sarkozy both drooling over that chicks ass is priceless:

    http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo//090709/ids_photos_wl/r3356552547.jpg/

  13. Transor Z Says:

    HUD releases $1.2 billion for homeless:
    http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/07/09/hud_releases_12b_in_stimulus_funds_for_homeless/

    Cute political cartoon from Toles:
    http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/cartoons/20090706_ink_tank?pg=17

  14. Wes Schott Says:

    No Rest for the Wealthy

    “The leisure class is in great measure sheltered from the stress of those economic exigencies which prevail in any modern, highly organized industrial community,” he writes. Back then, an industrial baron could embark on a leisurely European Grand Tour without worrying that his company would be disintermediated before he crossed the Atlantic. But today, Wall Street billionaires can be reduced to mere millionaires in a few months, and dot-com entrepreneurs can go from flip-flops to Gucci loafers and back again in a single business cycle.

  15. constantnormal Says:

    What does this mean? I know what it says, but what does it mean?

  16. I-Man Says:

    It means theres gonna be some burnin and lootin.

  17. Wes Schott Says:

    Gold % Annual Change
    USD AUD CAD CNY EUR INR JPY CHF GBP
    2001 2.5% 11.3% 8.8% 2.5% 8.1% 5.8% 17.4% 5.0% 5.4%
    2002 24.7% 13.5% 23.7% 24.8% 5.9% 24.0% 13.0% 3.9% 12.7%
    2003 19.6% -10.5% -2.2% 19.5% -0.5% 13.5% 7.9% 7.0% 7.9%
    2004 5.2% 1.4% -2.0% 5.2% -2.1% 0.0% 0.9% -3.0% -2.0%
    2005 18.2% 25.6% 14.5% 15.2% 35.1% 22.8% 35.7% 36.2% 31.8%
    2006 22.8% 14.4% 22.8% 18.8% 10.2% 20.5% 24.0% 13.9% 7.8%
    2007 31.4% 18.6% 10.4% 23.0% 17.9% 17.5% 24.7% 21.5% 29.2%
    2008 5.8% 32.5% 32.4% -1.1% 11.9% 30.4% -14.9% 0.2% 44.3%
    Average 16.3% 13.3% 13.6% 13.5% 10.8% 16.8% 13.6% 10.6% 17.1%
    (6 mos.) 30 June 2009 4.9% -9.1% -0.3% 5.0% 4.1% 3.1% 11.3% 6.8% -6.8%

  18. jeff in indy Says:

    Thursday, July 09, 2009
    Condo Association Files Bankruptcy
    by CalculatedRisk on 7/09/2009 04:25:00 PM

    South Florida’s Maison Grande condos.

  19. Wes Schott Says:

    constantnormal@5:40-

    i think it means men are loosing more jobs than women, but, it could be the other way around since it is not clearly defined

  20. Wes Schott Says:

    uuuhhhh – it is clearly defined when you read the text, it’s just not on the chart

    so, what does it mean, hmmm

    she has to pick up the tab, pay the bills and next thing you know you are out on ur ass ?

  21. constantnormal Says:

    “i think it means men are loosing more jobs than women,”

    Yes, that’s what is say, but what does that mean? Are we now in some bizarre form of reverse employment discrimination? Is this a reflection of millions of men going off to Iraq and Afghanistan because they can’t get jobs here? WHATEVER HAPPENED TO MALE CHAUVINISM!!??!!

  22. Wes Schott Says:

    are people in the military not counted as employed?

    perhaps singing up for the military for some is due to the lack of job opportunities for their particular skill set

    reverse discrimination is probably not a big factor, although, i see preferences given to females and ethnically diverse people, but i would be surprised it that is a significant reason for this

    hard to be a mcp (remember that one, oldies) when you ain’t bringin’ home the bacon

  23. constantnormal Says:

    My wife says it is because men make more, and so are being shot first, in the ever-present drive to make the workplace more efficient.

  24. constantnormal Says:

    “are people in the military not counted as employed?”

    I don’t know for sure, but I had thought that the spike back in 1949 was due to guys coming back from WWII and dumping a whole lotta men into the employment pool, faster than they could be assimilated. But that doesn’t explain the other bumps upward in male unemployment in 1983 and 1993 — apparently, guys tend to get axed in greater numbers during recessions.

  25. call me ahab Says:

    iman-

    excellent links- the bloomberg article on C was most interesting- the picture of Obama and Sarkozy staring at that chick’s ass-

    priceless-

    however- beauty is a thing to behold- so- it’s all good

  26. Wes Schott Says:

    @I-man,

    i 2nd the whale boat captain – kudos for the o and sarkozy shot

    happened to a friend of mine riding his segway into st lukes hospital

    only it was two cops…too funny

  27. Thor Says:

    Constant – No, what it means is that industries that traditionally employ more men (Banking, Construction) are being hit the hardest while industries that traditionally employ more women (education, health care) are still growing.

  28. Wes Schott Says:

    ooooh, Thor, some actual insight (no sarcasm whatsoever intended, seriously) – very nice.

  29. cvienne Says:

    @Thor

    “No, what it means is that industries that traditionally employ more men (Banking, Construction) are being hit the hardest while industries that traditionally employ more women (education, health care) are still growing.”

    Thor – but play that scenario out to infinity…

    At some point…FOR GROWTH…We don’t need a planet full of schoolteachers & nurses (even though Franklin thinks so)…

    So for better or worse you have to decide…If you want an economic GROWTH fabric, it DOESN’T DO ANY GOOD to invest in a future where job growth is geared towards those professions (teachers & nurses)…

    Unless, of course, you want to re-instate SLAVERY and make all the ‘goods producers’ (like construction workers) SLAVES…

  30. Pat G. Says:

    It’s late and I don’t see a link to Kohn’s statement. So here it is because EVERYONE should read this and be very concerned. The FED is apparently taking lessons from the banksters or is it vica versa?

    http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1247205960.php

    As to the inflation (Gary North) versus deflation (Mish Shedlock) debate read this:

    http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1247061244.php

    As to capacity utilization versus inflation debate read this: More importantly remember the ’70s..

    http://www.morganstanley.com/views/gef/archive/2009/20090703-Fri.html#anchorbe6052be-67c7-11de-9228-3fb01e8a07e2

  31. deanscamaro Says:

    Yes, Barry, you did miss something. The FT article about solutions for California, such as Oregon buying it out, busting it up into smaller states, private investment funds, Dubai investment, etc. Unless I overlooked it, I DIDN’T SEE ONE THING ABOUT CUTTING UNION WAGES/RETIREMENT, CUTTING SPENDING IN OTHER AREAS, etc and getting rid of some useless polticians who vote only for their only interests and not the overall good of the state.

  32. cvienne Says:

    @Pat G…

    All I had to see was a MS dot com link there to see that all three were just talking their book…

    Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley is going to put out the FULL COURT PRESS to try and get people to but the oil they have in container ships floating on the high seas…

    I’d rather buy a shopping mall…

  33. bergsten Says:

    This is a test of formatting within a reply
    This should be in italics
    And this should be underlined
    Apologies for cluttering up your blog.

  34. bergsten Says:

    Do colors work too?