<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1 in 8 US Mortgages Falling Behind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Mortgage Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 1 in 8 US Mortgages Falling Behind &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207843</link>
		<dc:creator>New Mortgage Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 1 in 8 US Mortgages Falling Behind &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207843</guid>
		<description>[...] Barry Ritholtz wrote an interesting post today on1 in 8 US &lt;b&gt;Mortgages&lt;/b&gt; Falling Behind &#124; The Big PictureHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barry Ritholtz wrote an interesting post today on1 in 8 US &lt;b&gt;Mortgages&lt;/b&gt; Falling Behind | The Big PictureHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chart Junkie: A Picture's Worth ... 8.21.09 &#124; Wall St. Cheat Sheet</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207174</link>
		<dc:creator>Chart Junkie: A Picture's Worth ... 8.21.09 &#124; Wall St. Cheat Sheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207174</guid>
		<description>[...] from the Mortgage Bankers Association show an increasingly dismal picture for mortgagees. (Hat Tip: The Big Picture) Click Image for Larger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the Mortgage Bankers Association show an increasingly dismal picture for mortgagees. (Hat Tip: The Big Picture) Click Image for Larger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Change in the Internal Strength in Our Universe of Stocks - Steve Cook on Disciplined Investing - InvestorsInsight.com &#124; Financial Intelligence, Advice &#38; Research / Investment Strategies &#38; Planning for Individual Investors.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207127</link>
		<dc:creator>A Change in the Internal Strength in Our Universe of Stocks - Steve Cook on Disciplined Investing - InvestorsInsight.com &#124; Financial Intelligence, Advice &#38; Research / Investment Strategies &#38; Planning for Individual Investors.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207127</guid>
		<description>[...] recent mortgage foreclosure stats--which don&#8217;t make good reading (short):&#160;&#160;&#160; http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/&#160;&#160;&#160; The Fed&#8217;s dilemma (medium):&#160;&#160;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent mortgage foreclosure stats&#8211;which don&rsquo;t make good reading (short):&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/&nbsp;&nbsp;&#038;nbsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/&nbsp;&nbsp;&#038;nbsp</a>; The Fed&rsquo;s dilemma (medium):&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinM</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207117</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207117</guid>
		<description>Headline is very misleading!

One in eight describes FLA and NEV, not the nation. Don&#039;t start playing CNBC with the headlines Ritholtz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headline is very misleading!</p>
<p>One in eight describes FLA and NEV, not the nation. Don&#8217;t start playing CNBC with the headlines Ritholtz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmanuel117</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207107</link>
		<dc:creator>emmanuel117</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207107</guid>
		<description>Euroland is feeling good, $ not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Euroland is feeling good, $ not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcHAPPY</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207101</link>
		<dc:creator>mcHAPPY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207101</guid>
		<description>How long?
How long must we sing this song?
How long?
How loooooong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long?<br />
How long must we sing this song?<br />
How long?<br />
How loooooong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effective Demand</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207100</link>
		<dc:creator>Effective Demand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207100</guid>
		<description>Here is another data point showing that the market is currently supply constrained in California:
http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com/2009/08/supply-constrained.html

Until some of that latent supply (wanting/needing to sell or in default) becomes effective supply (a home being marketed on the MLS) sales will be limited.

Bernanke has created a  very good market to liquidate supply into but we are running out of homes to sell currently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another data point showing that the market is currently supply constrained in California:<br />
<a href="http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com/2009/08/supply-constrained.html" rel="nofollow">http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com/2009/08/supply-constrained.html</a></p>
<p>Until some of that latent supply (wanting/needing to sell or in default) becomes effective supply (a home being marketed on the MLS) sales will be limited.</p>
<p>Bernanke has created a  very good market to liquidate supply into but we are running out of homes to sell currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effective Demand</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207097</link>
		<dc:creator>Effective Demand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207097</guid>
		<description>BR,

Many people use Shadow Inventory as a defintion of bank owned homes not for sale on the market:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/08/MNL516UG90.DTL&amp;type=business&amp;tsp=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/32108755
http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/reo-inventory-hidden-shadows
http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/07/21/are-banks-holding-a-shadow-inventory-of-homes/
http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2009/05/06/toscano/717shadowinventory042109.txt
http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/shadow-housing-inventory-the-deception-of-the-foreclosure-numbers-and-the-real-reo-picture-a-case-study-of-southern-california-real-estate-how-40000-homes-are-hidden-from-public-view-by-banks/

Just as many people use it for the whole world of inventory wanting to sell but not on market.

My blog post was directed for the former not the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR,</p>
<p>Many people use Shadow Inventory as a defintion of bank owned homes not for sale on the market:<br />
<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/08/MNL516UG90.DTL&#038;type=business&#038;tsp=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/08/MNL516UG90.DTL&#038;type=business&#038;tsp=1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/32108755" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/32108755</a><br />
<a href="http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/reo-inventory-hidden-shadows" rel="nofollow">http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/reo-inventory-hidden-shadows</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/07/21/are-banks-holding-a-shadow-inventory-of-homes/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/07/21/are-banks-holding-a-shadow-inventory-of-homes/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2009/05/06/toscano/717shadowinventory042109.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2009/05/06/toscano/717shadowinventory042109.txt</a><br />
<a href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/shadow-housing-inventory-the-deception-of-the-foreclosure-numbers-and-the-real-reo-picture-a-case-study-of-southern-california-real-estate-how-40000-homes-are-hidden-from-public-view-by-banks/" rel="nofollow">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/shadow-housing-inventory-the-deception-of-the-foreclosure-numbers-and-the-real-reo-picture-a-case-study-of-southern-california-real-estate-how-40000-homes-are-hidden-from-public-view-by-banks/</a></p>
<p>Just as many people use it for the whole world of inventory wanting to sell but not on market.</p>
<p>My blog post was directed for the former not the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Ritholtz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207095</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Ritholtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207095</guid>
		<description>The term &lt;strong&gt;Shadow Inventory&lt;/strong&gt; -- at least the way that I use the phrase -- refers to the homes purchased during the boom that are not offered for sale, but would be if the market was improved. 

They are currently being rented or carried at a loss or simply owned -- and as soon as prices firm up, they will hit the market. 

Think of it as overhead resistance . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term <strong>Shadow Inventory</strong> &#8212; at least the way that I use the phrase &#8212; refers to the homes purchased during the boom that are not offered for sale, but would be if the market was improved. </p>
<p>They are currently being rented or carried at a loss or simply owned &#8212; and as soon as prices firm up, they will hit the market. </p>
<p>Think of it as overhead resistance . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effective Demand</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/1-in-8-mortgages-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-207087</link>
		<dc:creator>Effective Demand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=36144#comment-207087</guid>
		<description>The BP crowd might find a blog post I made tonight interesting, &lt;a href=&quot;http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com/2009/08/bursting-bubble-shadow-inventory-does.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bursting the bubble: Shadow Inventory does not exist. &lt;/a&gt;

Basically, people keep thinking there is this huge number of homes foreclosed on but not being marketed by the banks. The numbers simply don&#039;t  jive in California. There is no large number of bank owned homes not on the MLS unless they just recently got foreclosed on and are going through pre-list.

I&#039;ve searched public records and matched it with MLS data for my local area and haven&#039;t found it. Foreclosures are a matter of public record.. they can&#039;t be hidden. 

The real shadow inventory is the homes not being foreclosed on.. 

I highly recommend the following posts explaining what is currently going on:
http://mortgage.freedomblogging.com/2009/08/06/foreclosure-wave-gets-bigger/15037/

And why the foreclosure next wave may never come:
http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/waiting-catch-wave-surge-reo-listings-unlikely

These views (mine included) are definitely not the norm but they are data driven..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BP crowd might find a blog post I made tonight interesting, <a href="http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com/2009/08/bursting-bubble-shadow-inventory-does.html" rel="nofollow">Bursting the bubble: Shadow Inventory does not exist. </a></p>
<p>Basically, people keep thinking there is this huge number of homes foreclosed on but not being marketed by the banks. The numbers simply don&#8217;t  jive in California. There is no large number of bank owned homes not on the MLS unless they just recently got foreclosed on and are going through pre-list.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve searched public records and matched it with MLS data for my local area and haven&#8217;t found it. Foreclosures are a matter of public record.. they can&#8217;t be hidden. </p>
<p>The real shadow inventory is the homes not being foreclosed on.. </p>
<p>I highly recommend the following posts explaining what is currently going on:<br />
<a href="http://mortgage.freedomblogging.com/2009/08/06/foreclosure-wave-gets-bigger/15037/" rel="nofollow">http://mortgage.freedomblogging.com/2009/08/06/foreclosure-wave-gets-bigger/15037/</a></p>
<p>And why the foreclosure next wave may never come:<br />
<a href="http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/waiting-catch-wave-surge-reo-listings-unlikely" rel="nofollow">http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/waiting-catch-wave-surge-reo-listings-unlikely</a></p>
<p>These views (mine included) are definitely not the norm but they are data driven..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

