FDIC Low on Funds

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 27th, 2009, 3:15PM

In the Day Ahead, WSJ reporter Kelly Evans reports that the FDIC insurance fund is low, and that the agency may have to borrow funds for the first time since the savings and loan crisis.

8/27/2009

3 Responses to “FDIC Low on Funds”

  1. leftback Says:

    Ain’t really a big surprise, is it, this one…?

  2. Blissex Says:

    as usual these news are completely wrong or at least misleading. The FDIC’s funds are the entire capital of the banking industry; the so called “fund” is just an account into which it put advance payments. The FDIC can charge all member banks any amount needed to pay out depositor money at a failed member institution.

    The FDIC only runs a scheme, it does have no capital and is not an insurer; deposit insurance in the USA is a pay-as-you go self-insurance system, where all money paid to depositors is owed by all other banks, not by the FDIC.

    The FDIC may borrow money from the Treasury only to spread out the payments from non-failed member banks to depositors of failed member banks.

    http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2008/pr08084.html
    «As per our authorizing statute, any money we might borrow from the Treasury must be paid back from industry assessments.»
    «The fund is 100 percent industry-backed. Our ability to raise premiums essentially means that the capital of the entire banking industry – that’s $1.3 trillion – is available for support.»
    «The FDIC receives no federal tax dollars – insured financial institutions fund its operations.»

  3. Black List Grows for Troubled Banks | ZachStocks Says:

    [...] Other Articles of Interest SuperNanke to the Rescue Consumer Stocks to Struggle, Debt to Blame Ritholtz: FDIC Low on Funds FT: US ‘Problem’ Bank List Hits 15 Year [...]

51 queries. 0.539 seconds.