<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Links: Monday Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrabandista13</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205503</link>
		<dc:creator>contrabandista13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205503</guid>
		<description>CNBC: &#039;Anyone Who Owns A Suit Can Come On Television&#039;

I thought that policy had been in effect for years....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC: &#8216;Anyone Who Owns A Suit Can Come On Television&#8217;</p>
<p>I thought that policy had been in effect for years&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrabandista13</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205501</link>
		<dc:creator>contrabandista13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205501</guid>
		<description>A little serving of reality from Tyler Durden.....

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/q2-2009-corporate-defaults-more-double-2008-total

Q2 2009 Corporate Defaults More Than Double 2008 Total

&quot;.... The second quarter of 2009 set a new record for the number of corporate defaults, with 82 non-financial events of default, consisting of 16 names in media and entertainment, 15 in autos and 15 in natural resources, according to a new report published by S&amp;P. The total amount of defaulted debt was $254 billion, far larger than the $102 billion spread among 69 defaults in all of 2008...&quot;

The new sub-prime.....

Ciao,

Econolicious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little serving of reality from Tyler Durden&#8230;..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/q2-2009-corporate-defaults-more-double-2008-total" rel="nofollow">http://www.zerohedge.com/article/q2-2009-corporate-defaults-more-double-2008-total</a></p>
<p>Q2 2009 Corporate Defaults More Than Double 2008 Total</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;. The second quarter of 2009 set a new record for the number of corporate defaults, with 82 non-financial events of default, consisting of 16 names in media and entertainment, 15 in autos and 15 in natural resources, according to a new report published by S&amp;P. The total amount of defaulted debt was $254 billion, far larger than the $102 billion spread among 69 defaults in all of 2008&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The new sub-prime&#8230;..</p>
<p>Ciao,</p>
<p>Econolicious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VennData</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205478</link>
		<dc:creator>VennData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205478</guid>
		<description>Wonk Watch

We read the smarties so you don’t have to

http://www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/sausage/2009/05/27/wonk-watch?obref=obnetwork

Includes: Barry Ritholtz, CEO of only research firm Fusion IQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonk Watch</p>
<p>We read the smarties so you don’t have to</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/sausage/2009/05/27/wonk-watch?obref=obnetwork" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/sausage/2009/05/27/wonk-watch?obref=obnetwork</a></p>
<p>Includes: Barry Ritholtz, CEO of only research firm Fusion IQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205466</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205466</guid>
		<description>why we need the CFPA http://baselinescenario.com/2009/08/17/a-cfpa-research-brief/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why we need the CFPA <a href="http://baselinescenario.com/2009/08/17/a-cfpa-research-brief/" rel="nofollow">http://baselinescenario.com/2009/08/17/a-cfpa-research-brief/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeg3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205465</link>
		<dc:creator>jeg3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205465</guid>
		<description>2009 Tech &quot;startups&quot; Award goes to:

http://techdirt.com/articles/20090817/0133175896.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 Tech &#8220;startups&#8221; Award goes to:</p>
<p><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090817/0133175896.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/articles/20090817/0133175896.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205462</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205462</guid>
		<description>not sure that cloud computing has much to do with mainframes (unless its running linux or unix i guess) have seen enough about it yet (but i have been in that business for more than 20 years).  it like distributed (been there done at least twice. nothing new there either) and centralization (again. nothing new there either) so far it looks like a way to save money on utility bills (lots of servers VS one), usually ends up that one is lots cheaper. and most ID theft isn&#039;t by computer by the old fashioned way. some one at a creditor or dumper diving gets your information (been there, didn&#039;t enjoy that ride either!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure that cloud computing has much to do with mainframes (unless its running linux or unix i guess) have seen enough about it yet (but i have been in that business for more than 20 years).  it like distributed (been there done at least twice. nothing new there either) and centralization (again. nothing new there either) so far it looks like a way to save money on utility bills (lots of servers VS one), usually ends up that one is lots cheaper. and most ID theft isn&#8217;t by computer by the old fashioned way. some one at a creditor or dumper diving gets your information (been there, didn&#8217;t enjoy that ride either!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205459</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205459</guid>
		<description>Hrmmm, I&#039;m debating on whether or not I should stop following the stock guys here and follow this bird instead.

http://www.dailymarkets.com/stocks/2009/08/09/lesson-from-a-parrot-buy-and-hold-blue-chips/

I&#039;m joking by the way :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrmmm, I&#8217;m debating on whether or not I should stop following the stock guys here and follow this bird instead.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymarkets.com/stocks/2009/08/09/lesson-from-a-parrot-buy-and-hold-blue-chips/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymarkets.com/stocks/2009/08/09/lesson-from-a-parrot-buy-and-hold-blue-chips/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m joking by the way :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205457</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205457</guid>
		<description>http://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-line-reduced-equity-allocation-on-monday-am-2009-08-17

October 2000 was last time Value Line was more bearish

&quot;In its Aug. 21 issue, which was emailed to subscribers early Monday, Value Line reduced its recommended equity allocation to the range of 60% to 70%. 

This reflects a cautious to outright bearish posture on Value Line&#039;s part, since the firm has never lowered its recommended allocation to below 50%. The last time it was lower than it is now was October 2000.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-line-reduced-equity-allocation-on-monday-am-2009-08-17" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-line-reduced-equity-allocation-on-monday-am-2009-08-17</a></p>
<p>October 2000 was last time Value Line was more bearish</p>
<p>&#8220;In its Aug. 21 issue, which was emailed to subscribers early Monday, Value Line reduced its recommended equity allocation to the range of 60% to 70%. </p>
<p>This reflects a cautious to outright bearish posture on Value Line&#8217;s part, since the firm has never lowered its recommended allocation to below 50%. The last time it was lower than it is now was October 2000.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205447</guid>
		<description>Moss:

I imagine you use XP. Solving this problem is one of the better security features of Vista and Windows 7. Guest account off by default.  You can have what&#039;s called an administrator account, but if you try to do anything that requires administrative privileges, like access someone else&#039;s data or change an high level setting, it tells you that it requires the privilege and you have to say ok.  Some people find this annoying, but it&#039;s really the only solution, much like having to SU in unix.  There were so many complaints about it that MS loosened it up in Win7, but you can change it back, which I advise.  You don&#039;t see it often once you have the machine set up.  Of course, you can still give people limited accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moss:</p>
<p>I imagine you use XP. Solving this problem is one of the better security features of Vista and Windows 7. Guest account off by default.  You can have what&#8217;s called an administrator account, but if you try to do anything that requires administrative privileges, like access someone else&#8217;s data or change an high level setting, it tells you that it requires the privilege and you have to say ok.  Some people find this annoying, but it&#8217;s really the only solution, much like having to SU in unix.  There were so many complaints about it that MS loosened it up in Win7, but you can change it back, which I advise.  You don&#8217;t see it often once you have the machine set up.  Of course, you can still give people limited accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/monday-10-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-205443</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=35735#comment-205443</guid>
		<description>@ Mike

You&#039;re probably right.  Life&#039;s a bitch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike</p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably right.  Life&#8217;s a bitch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

