2002-06: An “Unhealthy Dependence on Construction”

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 28th, 2009, 10:30AM

It is clear in retrospect that in parts of the Sun Belt, the economic dependence on construction reached unhealthy levels in recent years.
-NYT

>

File that sentence under “stating the obvious.”.

The reporter seems to have overlooked the fact that some people found it obvious — not in retrospect, mind you, but in real time. One only needed to have looked at the data and then compared it to historical metrics to reach the obvious conclusion that housing was way off kilter. What was taking place was a backwards, real estate driven economy.

Here’s an excerpt from the Times:

“In a little more than three years, the Phoenix area has gone from the hottest of Sun Belt hot spots to one of the nation’s economic disaster areas. It is not alone in its rapid fall.

After riding high during the boom, the Las Vegas area, parts of southern Florida, and Southern California’s inland counties have also been brought low by plunging payrolls, billions lost in housing wealth, a continuing epidemic of foreclosures, record government budget deficits and stagnating populations.

These areas share one thing besides their warm climates. To a degree unmatched in the rest of the country, their recent prosperity was built not on manufacturing, technology or natural resources, but on construction and real estate — growth for its own sake.

As other areas tasted the excesses of the housing boom, they gorged on it. From 2002 to 2006, about 20 percent of private industry growth in the United States was tied to real estate and construction. In the Phoenix area, almost 36 percent of growth in the private economy during that period — more than $34 billion worth — came from real estate and construction.”

The entire piece — the print version was buried behind a weird headline in the Business section House by House, A Sun Belt Setback — is well worth a read.

>

0828-biz-webgrowth

>

Previously:
Half of New Jobs Are Real Estate Related (May 27th, 2005)

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2005/05/half-of-new-jobs-are-real-estate-related/

Real Estate and the Post-Crash Economy (December 29, 2006)

http://www.2000wave.com/article.asp?id=mwo122906

The Ongoing Impact of the Housing Sector (August 24, 2007)

http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/john_mauldins_outside_the_box/archive/2007/08/27/the-ongoing-impact-of-the-housing-sector.aspx

Source:
Construction That Fueled Growth in the Sun Belt Slows
JOHN COLLINS RUDOLF
NYT, August 28, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/business/economy/28growth.html

UoM Final Consumer Confidence

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 28th, 2009, 10:20AM

The Final August U of Michigan confidence figure was 65.7, above the preliminary reading of 63.2, higher than the consensus estimate of 64 but is a touch below the 66 seen in July. Both Current Conditions and the Future Outlook rose from the Aug preliminary number. However, from July, Current Conditions fell almost 4 points but was partially offset by a 1.8 jump in the Outlook. YTD, Current Conditions are only 3.3 points above the low in March while the Outlook is 14.5 points above the Feb low. This discrepancy over how people feel today vs the improvement they foresee has been evident in other confidence figures, and was seen in Tuesday’s Conference Board confidence number. Inflation expectations were unchanged with the initial reading at 2.8% and down .1% from July.

Bonds and Beyond

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 28th, 2009, 9:51AM

Airtime: Fri. Aug. 28 2009 | 7:05 AM ET

A look at the US bond market and beyond, with Jim Bianco, of Bianco Research; Tony Crescenzi, of Pimco; and Jim Iuorio, of TJM Institutional Services.

Income/Spending/Savings

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 28th, 2009, 9:11AM

July Income was flat vs expectations of a gain of .1% but June was revised higher by .2% to a decline of 1.1%. Spending rose .2%, in line with forecasts and June was revised up by .2%. Because the headline PCE was flat, REAL spending rose by .2% (vs .1% gain in June) and with flat income, the Savings Rate fell to 4.2% from 4.5%. Over the past 30 years, the Savings Rate has averaged 5.6% and before 1995 it averaged 7.7%. Headline PCE fell .8% y/o/y and is negative for a 3rd straight month. The core PCE though rose .1% m/o/m and is up 1.4% y/o/y, the lowest since Sept ’03 but it clearly didn’t get to the deflationary levels that headline PCE has achieved. This highlights the impact that commodity prices have had on inflation just within the past year. Bottom line, Q3 GDP will see positive growth but the contribution from the consumer side will be muted as income growth remains lacking.

Who would have thunk that in ’06, SNL would reveal that something was amiss at the height of the credit bubble, http://www.hulu.com/watch/1389/saturday-night-live-dont-buy-stuff . Saving is the new cool and having credit card debt is so passe. This transition is not a multi Q process but multi year and it has implications for US economic growth for years to come. Our economy will be for the better though in time as exports and investment eventually pick up the slack as we can better finance our growth with savings and less on debt. Even if consumers wanted to pick up their spending in the face of weak income growth, they can’t as access to credit remains crimped. Credit drove our economy on high speed for 10 years. We’ll get a rebound but it won’t be sustainable until we save more and export more.

Federal Income Withholding Taxes

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 28th, 2009, 8:00AM

We have not updated this chart in quite a while: Here is the chart version of Treasury’s “Withheld Income and Employment Taxes.”

>

tres-chart
Daily Treasury Statement, dated August 26, 2009.

>

via Matt Trivisonno’s Blog

http://www.trivisonno.com/withholding-taxes-chart

Where is WSJ’s “In Today’s Paper” ?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 28th, 2009, 6:16AM

Subscribers to the WSJ may have noticed that the usual and easily accessible link tot he full digital version of the print edition “In Today’s Paper” is no longer on the home page.

To find it, you need to sift thru 4 levels of nested links, via your account page. I don’t know if this is a temporary glitch or a purposeful decision, but its damned annoying.

For those of you that like this page of everything in today’s paper, you best bookmark this link:

WSJ TODAY’S PRINT EDITION

http://online.wsj.com/page/us_in_todays_paper.html

>

UPDATE: August 28, 2009 7:20am

Its now returned — I am going to assume it was a java glitch . . .

Bernanke’s Identity Theft a Shame on Many Levels

Email this post Print this post
By Jack McHugh - August 28th, 2009, 12:00AM

Good Evening: Like a self-sealing tire, U.S. stocks were punctured this morning but managed to reflate this afternoon. Some grim news about the health of non-TARP banks was behind the decline, while speculation in financial firms that DID receive bailouts helped launch the comeback. If you think it is bizarre to see taxpayers actively chase the stub equity pieces of firms they already passively own, you are not alone. Like the identity theft of our Federal Reserve Chairman, the fever to acquire companies whose proudest achievement of 2009 is effecting a 1 for 20 stock split, this too shall pass. What might be a shame, though, is that the band of thieves who stole the identity of our top central banker didn’t perpetrate their crime years ago.

Today’s economic data were mixed and thus had little impact on today’s proceedings. The government’s second guess about Q2 GDP didn’t budge from the previous -1.0% estimation, but the price deflator did when it dropped to the zero mark. Q3 looks to be a positive number, but Q2 kept alive the quarterly streak of negative nominal GDP figures. Jobless claims were a bit higher than expected, and they remain stubbornly high for what so many say is an economic recovery. Stocks opened lower in part due to more rumors that China is seeking to rein in bank lending, but they dropped more than 1% once the FDIC story started to circulate (see below). The number of problem banks — which could be counted using one person’s fingers only three years ago (a great coincident indicator of extraordinarily easy credit and leading indicator of trouble) — is growing so fast the FDIC insurance fund is at risk of being depleted. Stand by for yet another bailout.

Stocks didn’t linger at today’s lows for long, however, as speculation soon ran rampant in names like AIG and Citigroup (see below). Neither entity would exist today if not for the generous assistance provided by taxpayers, so why companies like these (FNM, FRE, and a few others also qualify) haven’t been diluted down to penny-sized proportions is beyond me. And yet, because taxpayers have received relatively small stakes for providing emergency capital and then backing the debt issuance of these firms, folks like John Paulson will continue to take stakes in companies like Citigroup. They are a call option on the survival of these firms, as well as a bet that Uncle Sam won’t further dilute current investors at some point down the road. The AIG situation is even more egregious, but all it took was some chatter about Hank Greenberg’s possible involvement with his old firm to really squeeze the shorts who rightly think the equity should have little or no value. AIG was up a head-scratching 27% today and has tripled in just the past three weeks!

In addition to some momentum chasing in financial stocks, a turnaround in materials and commodities names also helped the tape firm up in the afternoon. After a slow and steady climb back to unchanged, the major averages turned positive late in the session and stayed there. By day’s end, index returns were bracketed between a loss of 0.25% for the Dow Transports and a gain of 0.4% for the Dow Industrials. Treasurys traded on both sides of the flat line before closing with small losses. Today’s 7 year note auction went well enough, but those results didn’t stop yields from rising 1 to 3 bps at the close. Like stocks and commodities, the dollar reversed today. Starting mixed against its rivals, the greenback headed south the rest of the day and skidded 0.75% in the process. The buck’s weak knees emboldened the non vacationers left in the commodity pits, and the CRB index was able to finish with fractional gains after being down more than 1% this morning.

I abhor identity theft, and my first thought when the news hit the wires that Ben Bernanke’s identity had been stolen after his wife’s purse had been snatched last year was probably similar to the one most people had: It could happen to anyone. On top of insult to potential financial injury, this whole episode struck the Bernankes late last summer, just as the credit crisis needed his full attention. I’m sorry it happened, but I do have a couple of questions for the perpetrators. How, oh members in the “Cannon to the Wiz”, did you finally get caught? Did you assume the Bernanke persona and try to run the printing presses to your advantage? If so, how did anyone notice a change in the brisk gait of money printing? Furthermore, why didn’t one of your clever bunch try to use Mr. Bernanke’s credentials to head on over to the Eccles building to Chair an FOMC session or two? One must think big during these troubled times, but “Big Head” and his ring of thugs apparently decided against it.

To the criminal who actually stole Ms. Bernanke’s purse and is still at large, I offer this piece of advice. Before turning yourself in, do yourself and your country a favor by handing Mr. Bernanke’s identity information to someone like Paul Volcker. You’ll get a shorter sentence and your country will benefit. Speculation would be tamed, and long term inflation expectations would probably fall far enough to shrink the budget deficit by obviating the need for more bond purchases. If someone else must possess the Chairman’s identity, who other than Mr. Volcker would be more responsible in assuming it? We’ll need Volcker’s tough-mindedness to stare down Congress if we are to ever exit all these stimulus programs. It’s a shame that the Mr. Bernanke had his identity stolen last fall, but the tragedy is that someone didn’t steal Mr. Greenspan’s in the 1990′s.

– Jack McHugh

U.S. Markets Wrap: Stocks Gain on Fuel Rise; Bonds, Dollar Fall
FDIC Problem Bank List Surges, Putting Fund at Risk
AIG Gains on Speculation Greenberg May Help Insurer
HEDGE-FUND BIG PAULSON MAD ABOUT CITI STOCK
Bernanke Victimized by Identity Fraud Ring

Honest Ben

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 27th, 2009, 6:00PM

bernanke-money

via Contrary Riches

FDIC Low on Funds

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 27th, 2009, 3:15PM

In the Day Ahead, WSJ reporter Kelly Evans reports that the FDIC insurance fund is low, and that the agency may have to borrow funds for the first time since the savings and loan crisis.

8/27/2009

Thursday 10 Link Roundup

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 27th, 2009, 2:30PM

Here’s a quick 10 spot of links worth reading:

U.S. Stock Pessimism Drops to Lowest Since 2007, Survey Finds (Bloomberg) Pessimism about U.S. stocks fell to the lowest level since the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index peaked in October 2007, as economic reports and policy makers indicate the recession in the world’s largest economy is easing.

Roubini: The Spend-And-Borrow Economy (Forbes) Governments have been spending and borrowing like never before. The question now is: how do they stop?

Fannie, Freddie soar on opportunistic day traders (Reuters)

Homebuilders Buying Land After Three Years of Cutting Inventory (Bloomberg) Homebuilders that spent the past three years selling off land and writing down the value of property holdings are scouring markets in Sacramento, Phoenix, Denver and Orlando — cities synonymous with the real estate bubble — looking for deals on ready-to-build lots as they prepare for a rebound. Writedowns and write-offs by 14 of the largest publicly traded homebuilders totaled $28.5 billion since the start of 2006.

ATA Truck Tonnage Index Rose 2.1 Percent in July (ATA)

Adjustable Mortgages Loom as Threat to Housing Recovery (NYT) more than a half-million option ARMs scheduled to reset in the next four years, at rates many homeowners cannot afford.

When all else fails, blame the lawyers… (Footnoted)

Finance: Before the Next Meltdown (Democracy: A Journal of Ideas)  Intellectual conservatives and bankers have mounted an even more fervent defense of financial innovation. For the past 30 years, financial innovation has increased costs and risks for both individual consumers and the global economy. Consumers bought houses they could not otherwise have bought using new mortgages they had no hope of repaying, creating a housing bubble, while new derivatives helped hide the risk of those mortgages, creating a securities bubble. The collapse of those bubbles has shaken the world for the last year. Today’s challenge is to rethink financial innovation and learn how to separate the good from the bad

A brief history of climate change and conflict (The Bulletin)

Second Degree Murder and Six Other Crimes Cheaper than Pirating Music (Gizmodo)

To answer an emailer’s question from yesterday, I may not agree with all of links I post, but I always find them intriguing and/or thought provoking . . . .

43 queries. 0.991 seconds.