New Home Sales

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 26th, 2009, 12:30PM

Marketwatch:

Government statisticians have low confidence in the monthly report on new-home sales, which is subject to large revisions and large sampling and other statistical errors. In most months, the government isn’t sure whether sales rose or fell. The standard error in July, for instance, was plus or minus 13.4%.

The government says it can take up to five months to establish a statistically meaningful trend in sales. Over the past five months, sales have been on a 373,000-unit annual pace, up from 358,000 in the five months through June.

For all of 2008, 485,000 homes were sold. In 2007, it was 776,000. Sales in April, May and June were revised higher in the latest report. Sales increased 9.1% in June to a 395,000 pace, up from 384,000 reported earlier. Economists had expected July’s sales of new homes to come in at 395,000, according to a survey conducted by MarketWatch (vs 433k)

Nicely contextualized . . .

>

Previously:
New Home Sales Data: Don’t rely On It Either (November 30th, 2005)

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2005/11/new-home-sales-data-dont-rely-on-it-either/

New Home Sales Up, but beware double digit monthly gains (May 24th, 2007)

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/05/new-home-sales-up-but-beware-double-digit-monthly-gains/

Sources:
New Residential Sales
Commerce Department Census Division

http://www.census.gov/newhomesales

http://www.census.gov/const/newressales.pdf

New-home sales jump nearly 10% in July
Rex Nutting
MarketWatch, Aug 26, 2009

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-new-home-sales-jump-nearly-10-in-july-2009-08-26

Trader Talk With Art Cashin

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 26th, 2009, 12:15PM

Airtime: Wed. Aug. 26 2009 | 8:50 AM ET

Art Cashin, head of floor operations at UBS, has the buzz from the NYSE.

Annotated Copper & Oil

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 26th, 2009, 11:46AM

I am enjoying these annotated charts, via David, who asks:

“Why has copper advanced more than oil in the latest bounce? Where might copper be going from here,  and why? And lastly, Where is oil going from here (and why)?”

click for ginormous chart
copper

Bernanke Reappointment Politically Shrewd

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 26th, 2009, 10:40AM

As President Obama trumpets the turnaround in the economy, WSJ’s Executive Washington Editor Gerald F. Seib says the reappointment of Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke, therefore, is a politically shrewd move.

Trader Talk With Art Cashin

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 26th, 2009, 10:36AM

Airtime: Wed. Aug. 26 2009 | 8:50 AM ET

Art Cashin, head of floor operations at UBS, has the buzz from the NYSE.

StockTwits Desktop

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 26th, 2009, 10:25AM

I just saw a demo of the new StockTwits Desktop.  This is the 2nd wicked cool product I have seen recently.  Its a combination of a “social Bloomberg” meets an iTunes Music Store for finance.

This is going to be very very neat trade related tool/product . . .

The Old Stock version of StockTwits (below) will continue operating on Twitter data. It will be the “Lite” web version of StockTwits; The full powered version will become a free downloadable app for your desktop. . .

>
stocktwits

That’s the really cool aspect of recessions: The ideas keep bubbling up amongst the creative innovators, regardless of market action.

Durable Goods

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 26th, 2009, 8:58AM

July Durable Goods rose a much better than expected 4.9% vs the estimated gain of 3% but ex transports, new orders rose .8%, .1% less than expected. The June data for both headline and ex transports were revised higher. Non defense capital goods ex aircraft, the core capital spending component, fell .3% after healthy gains in the two prior months and is why the S&P futures likely traded modestly lower after the report. Leading the headline gain was a 107.2% rise in nondefense aircraft and a .9% gain in vehicles and parts (as many auto plants ramped up again). Orders for computers/electronics, electrical equipment, primary metals and fabricated metals rose while machinery fell by 6.6%. Shipments (gets directly plugged into GDP) rose 2%. The inventory to shipments ratio fell to 1.81 from 1.87 and to the lowest since Dec ’08 as total inventories fell by .8%, down for a 10th straight month but the pace of decline was the smallest since Feb. Bottom line, the data further confirms stability as ex transport new orders are up for a 3rd straight month but still remain lower by 20.4% y/o/y and thus reflects that even a modest reversion to the mean can lead to a sharp rebound in orders. The key is whether the rebound expands beyond the auto sector.

Bulls get more giddy and bears go into further hibernation

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 26th, 2009, 7:57AM

Stock market bullishness has reached a new high in this run from the March lows as measured by the weekly II survey of newsletter writers. Bulls rose to 51.6 from 48.3 last week and that is the highest since Dec ’07 while Bears fell to 19.8 from 23.1, the lowest since Oct ’07. This contrarian indicator in no way marks an imminent change in direction as the bulls can be right for a period of time as they typically are in bull market moves. The August German IFO business confidence figure rose to the highest since Sept ’08 and was 1.5 points more than consensus but European stocks traded lower after its release as maybe a sign of good data being already discounted. German bunds rallied in spite of the number and US Treasuries are following sending the 10 yr bond yield to the lowest level since July 13th. ABC confidence rose to a 3 month high, up by 1 point on the week. The MBA said refi’s rose to an 11 week high and purchases rose to a 7 week high. July Durable goods and New Home sales data are the key numbers of the day and the US Treasury auctions of 5 yr’s today.

Bernanke Bashing

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 26th, 2009, 7:12AM

The Bernanke renomination has been widely approved — a WSJ survey showed 74% in favor, and amongst Economists, its even higher.

But a backlash against the Fed chief is underway, with some stinging criticisms coming from very sharp observers.

Ambrose Pierce notes in the Telegraph that BB may have saved the world, but he helped cause the crisis in the first place”

“Ben Bernanke has proved himself a heroic fire-fighter, saving world from a calamitous spiral into debt deflation by showering markets with liquidity.
A good thing too. He helped cause the raging fire of 2007-2009 in the first place. As a Princeton professor and then a junior Federal Reserve governor, Mr Bernanke was the intellectual architect of his predecessor Alan Greenspan’s policies that so distorted global finance and pushed debt to historic extremes.”

While there is a lot of truth to that statement, we cannot call Bernanke “the intellectual architect of Greenspan’s policies.” They were decades in the making, well established long before Bernanke joined the FOMC in 2002.

Stephen Roach is even more critical of the Fed Chief as FOMC governor in the FT. He notes that “It is as if a doctor guilty of malpractice is being given credit for inventing a miracle cure. Maybe the patient needs a new doctor.”

Heh. From Firefighting Pyro to MedMal Miracle cure, the metaphors are flying.

Where Roach shines is when he gets more granular. Specifically, Roach identifies “three critical mistakes” that Bernanke made prior to the September ’08 collapse:

1) Like Greenspan, Bernanke was deeply wedded to the philosophical conviction that central banks should be agnostic when it comes to responding to asset bubbles.

2) Bernanke was the intellectual champion of the “global saving glut” defense that exonerated the US from its bubble-prone tendencies; Much to the annoyance of our Asian financiers, BB blamed their savers for our rate conundrum.

3) Philosophically, Bernanke is cut from the same libertarian cloth that led the Greenspan Fed into this mess. He is “Steeped in the Greenspan credo that markets know better than regulators.” Even worse, Bernanke was part of the “prevailing Fed mindset that abrogated its regulatory authority in the era of excess.”

Points 1 and 3 are critical to the Fed — and the global economy — going forward.

I am less critical than Roach regarding the Bernanke renomination as to his 3 year terms as Governor. Let’s not forget that Greenspan was know as the Maestro back then. Congress, which is now pillorying Bernanke every appearance, was adoring of Easy Al’s visage and garbled Greenspeak each and every appearance. AG ran the Fed as an unchallenged stronghold, a fiefdom where he was the central-banker-in-chief as rock star. No one challenged him directly.

That seems to be lost in a lot of the revisionism now taking place. Roach writes “While America’s head central banker deserves credit for being creative and courageous in orchestrating an unusually aggressive monetary easing programme, it is important to remember that his pre-crisis actions played an equally critical role in setting the stage for the most wrenching recession since the 1930s.”

Not exactly. It was Greenspan’s Fed. Under his leadership, the FOMC and its governors were all second bananas to the Wolrd’s most famous banker. In Bailout Nation, I criticize this deference: “The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) must take responsibility for following [Greenspan] so obsequiously, especially in the latter years of his reign.”

However much I blame the FOMC, I have a hard time holding them to the same level of accountability as I do Greenspan. He was the master architect, the maestro conducting the monetary policy orchestra.

Second bananas cannot should the blame for what the head of the bunch does. Once they become banana-in-chief, the standards and level of accoutanbility all go up accordingly.

>

Sources:
The troubling side of Ben Bernanke
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard.
Telegraph 8:29PM BST 25 Aug 2009

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/6089383/The-troubling-side-of-Ben-Bernanke.html

The case against Bernanke
Stephen Roach
FT, August 25 2009

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a2ba2378-9186-11de-879d-00144feabdc0.html

Economists React: Bernanke Reappointment Is ‘Good News’
Phil Izzo
Real Time Economics, AUGUST 25, 2009

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/08/25/economists-react-bernanke-reappointment-is-good-news/

Read the rest of this entry »

Stocks Shout “Recovery!”; What Do Other Markets Say?

Email this post Print this post
By Jack McHugh - August 25th, 2009, 11:13PM

Good Evening: U.S. stocks rose once again on Tuesday, halting its latest losing streak at one. What was interesting about today’s rather modest closing gains is that, given the news flow, they could have been quite a bit better. Ben Bernanke was reappointed to his position as Fed Chairman, home prices actually rose a tad last month, and consumer confidence soared well beyond expectations. A very firm tape this morning was greeted with yawns and some selling this afternoon, and though stocks have risen nicely since I departed for a vacation last week, equities are starting to look winded. The other major capital markets aren’t sending the same V-shaped recovery signals that stocks have since March, according to Gluskin Sheff’s David Rosenberg, so it makes sense to examine this dichotomy in search of some directional clues.

Stocks have been seizing upon every piece of better than expected economic data for months now, and today was no different. U.S. stock index futures were relatively unmoved by Chairman Bernanke’s reappointment, which was leaked to the press last night, but the mood brightened when the S&P Case-Shiller home price indexes were released prior to this morning’s open. Both the 10 city and 20 city composite indexes rose 1.4% month over month, slightly besting forecasts for fractional gains (see below). The year over year figures are still well in the red (down 15%), but the second quarter marked the first advance in home prices since 2006. This release was welcome news indeed for the 30% or so of mortgage holders sporting negative home equity (as of June), but a true revival in the housing market still looks a long ways off.

The major averages popped 0.5% in the wake of the Case-Shiller data, but they went to post March highs once the Conference Board posted its latest consumer sentiment readings. Leaping from the mid 40′s to the mid 50′s in a single bound (consensus estimates were for an uptick into the upper 40′s), the August reading for consumer confidence was immediately greeted with a further 1% gain in the major averages. Taken in context, however, it’s hard to see why market participants were so enthusiastic about this report. A reading of 54.1 is less than half the peak levels over 110 seen in 2007, and the August numbers are still below May’s 54.9. For reference, the S&P 500 is up more than 15% during this timeframe.

Whether or not this statistical disparity finally dawned on equity investors after this morning’s high water mark was reached is not knowable, but stocks spent the rest of the session on the defensive. Though they never did hit negative territory, the indexes did nose over and approach the unchanged mark in the early afternoon. They went mostly sideways for the rest of the day, finishing with gains ranging from 0.25% for the S&P to 0.7% for the Dow Transports. The retreat from new highs may be nothing more than simple profit taking, but on a day when the wizard of quantitative easing was granted four more years in which to work his magic, the bulls might have expected more upside. I was asked by a reader just what Bernanke’s extended stay in the Eccles building might mean, but I will table the matter for a future commentary. Besides, the true measure of the impact of Bernanke’s policies can’t be taken until more time passes. Let’s see if he can exit all the emergency easing programs with the same haste with which he launched them.

With equities rising, the Depression fighting Bernanke getting another term, and more supply at hand, Treasurys had every reason to decline today — but didn’t. They have even ignored an assertion by PIMCO’s Paul McCulley that the bond bull market is over (see below). Just what message bonds might be sending these days will be examined in more detail below, but today yields managed to decline 3 to 4 basis points. The dollar index was virtually unchanged, but commodities struggled. Led by a 3% drop in crude oil, the CRB index fell 1.5% on Tuesday.

David Rosenberg, who used to toil as the Chief North American Economist at Merrill Lynch and is now in charge of all things macro for Toronto’s Gluskin Sheff, posed some interesting questions for those who assume the equity rally is proof positive a global economic recovery is now under way. In Monday’s “Afternoon Tea with Dave”, Mr. Rosenberg asks investors to “be mindful of some non-corroborating variables”. Quoting directly from his piece, Mr. Rosenberg lists the following disparities:

1. The Treasury market should be selling off if we are in the midst of a reflationary or a major asset allocation shift. Instead, the yield on the U.S. 10 year Treasury note is some 50 bps below its recent highs.

2. The “real” yield, as measured by the TIPS market, has fallen 20 bps since July 9, to sub 1.7% (a proxy for “real growth expectations”) — during which the S&P 500 has rallied 16%.

3. The Baltic Dry Index slid 10% last week and down 26% in August and is now at a three month low. Combined with the news of the sharp 25% falloff in Chinese copper imports in July, this could be a sign that the global inventory cycle has proven to be a one quarter affair.

4. Corporate spreads have begun to widen out (by 24 bps from the recent low in the investment-grade U.S. market and by nearly 80 bps for the high-yield sector) — these spreads, in the past, have proved to be reliable leading indicators (in both directions).

5. Finally, not only do we currently have a puny sub 4.0% earnings yield on the S&P 500, but look at the dividend yield — all the way down to 2.3%. At the March lows in the market, the dividend yield was sitting at 3.6%, which compared very favourably at the time to a 1.8% yield on the 5 year Treasury note and a 2.8% yield on the 10 year note. Now, the 5 year note is 2.5% and the 10 year at 3.6% — both back at a premium to the dividend yield. The most appealing yield, however, may be Baa corporate bonds, which is now at 6.5% or a juicy 8.6% in “real” inflation-adjusted terms.

Mr. Rosenberg is essentially saying that if the post WWII playbook for a V-shaped rebound in stock prices preceding a V-shaped recovery in economic growth is the right model for what we’ve all witnessed since March, then some key markets (Treasurys, TIPS, corporates, high yield bonds, commodity volumes, and dividend yields) are not reading from the same script. To Mr. Rosenberg’s fine list of “non-corroborating variables”, I would add the U.S. dollar. The U.S. dollar index is hovering near all time lows, but it is supposed to be rising at this point in the economic cycle. Our trade deficit was averaging more than $60 billion per month only a year ago and is now averaging less than half that amount. Due to trade alone, global dollar emissions have been cut in percentage terms that used to strongly correlate with rising greenback values. Not this time; some other factor must be at work.

That something is money printing and quantitative easing by the Bernanke Fed. Stocks love it, but the rest of the capital markets have been grudging in their embrace. Perhaps the other markets will some day reach what seems like such an obvious conclusion to the momentum crowd chasing equities at these levels, but I’m not so sure. Credit spreads have led equities and the Baltic Dry Index has led commodity prices since the Great Recession began. Though just as prone to short term noise as the markets they tend to lead, they have both been flashing warning signals for weeks now.

The bullish retort, of course, would likely be one of welcome — “just some more bricks in the ‘wall of worry’ stocks love to climb!”. A wall constructed of inventory re-stocking, ersatz demand (“cash for clunkers”), and funny money (quantitative easing) will remain high and sturdy-looking only as long as the mortar holding it together (sentiment) remains strong (btw, the State Street Investor Confidence hit its highest level since May 2004 just today — see below). Let’s see how this edifice withstands the changing weather come autumn. How it fares will in part determine Chairman Bernanke’s legacy, just as will any outbreak of inflation should he forget to take away the punchbowl equities have been dipping into these last few months.

– Jack McHugh

U.S. Stocks Advance as Confidence, Home Sales Beat Forecasts
Bernanke Is Nominated for Second Term as Fed Chief
U.S. Economy: Consumer Confidence, Home Prices Exceed Forecasts
Pimco’s McCulley Says Bond Bull Market Has Bottomed

43 queries. 3.523 seconds.