<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why CNBC&#8217;s Ratings Are Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:17:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNBC&#8217;s Ratings Fall Off A Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201670</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNBC&#8217;s Ratings Fall Off A Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201670</guid>
		<description>[...] Barry Ritholz says that CNBC needs to be thought of as the Weather Channel or ESPN. If there&#8217;s a hurricane or a playoff, ratings will go way up. In normal times, ratings are just correlated with the market. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barry Ritholz says that CNBC needs to be thought of as the Weather Channel or ESPN. If there&#8217;s a hurricane or a playoff, ratings will go way up. In normal times, ratings are just correlated with the market. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toddie.g</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201359</link>
		<dc:creator>toddie.g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201359</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m holding out some hope that David Faber will jump ship to Bloomberg TV making an exit statement that he can no longer stand the unprofessional nature of CNBC any longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m holding out some hope that David Faber will jump ship to Bloomberg TV making an exit statement that he can no longer stand the unprofessional nature of CNBC any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breakfast Links: Dr Tatoff, Richard Russell and Dayton &#171; The Reformed Broker</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201355</link>
		<dc:creator>Breakfast Links: Dr Tatoff, Richard Russell and Dayton &#171; The Reformed Broker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201355</guid>
		<description>[...] Barry Ritholtz on why CNBC has very little control over it&#8217;s own ratings.  (TBP) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barry Ritholtz on why CNBC has very little control over it&#8217;s own ratings.  (TBP) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201331</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201331</guid>
		<description>I was curious about this TBTF family tree so fyi:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric

Revenue: US$ 182.515 billion (2008)
Operating income: US$ 19.141 billion (2008) 
Net income: US$ 17.410 billion (2008) 
Total assets: US$ 797.769 billion (2008) 

GE Energy Infrastructure is composed of several units including (not a comprehensive list): GE Wind Power, Gasification, GE Nuclear Power, GE Coal Power, GE Oil &amp; Natural Gas, GE Solar Power, GE Hydroelectric Power, and related subsidiaries such as electric power transmission networks.

GE Technology Infrastructure is composed of 4 sub-units: GE Aviation, GE Enterprise Solutions, GE Healthcare, and GE Transportation

GE Capital has 4 sub-units: GE Aviation Financial Services, GE Commercial Finance, GE Energy Financial Services, and GE Treasury

NBC Universal has 17 sub-units:
NBC, Universal Studios, NBC Universal Television Group, NBC News, USA, Syfy, CNBC, MSNBC cable TV, NBC.com, MSNBC.com, iVillage, Bravo, qubo, SendMeRSS, Telemundo Television Studios, The Weather Channel, Hulu

me now - Locally: I am aware of influence from 12 NBC Universal units via Comcast .. and a local plant that SABIC acquired on 5/21/07 from GE&#039;s Plastics Division in a $11.6 billion cash deal, including $8.7 billion of its liabilities .. and a wind farm working towards 166 turbines SE of here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious about this TBTF family tree so fyi:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric</a></p>
<p>Revenue: US$ 182.515 billion (2008)<br />
Operating income: US$ 19.141 billion (2008)<br />
Net income: US$ 17.410 billion (2008)<br />
Total assets: US$ 797.769 billion (2008) </p>
<p>GE Energy Infrastructure is composed of several units including (not a comprehensive list): GE Wind Power, Gasification, GE Nuclear Power, GE Coal Power, GE Oil &amp; Natural Gas, GE Solar Power, GE Hydroelectric Power, and related subsidiaries such as electric power transmission networks.</p>
<p>GE Technology Infrastructure is composed of 4 sub-units: GE Aviation, GE Enterprise Solutions, GE Healthcare, and GE Transportation</p>
<p>GE Capital has 4 sub-units: GE Aviation Financial Services, GE Commercial Finance, GE Energy Financial Services, and GE Treasury</p>
<p>NBC Universal has 17 sub-units:<br />
NBC, Universal Studios, NBC Universal Television Group, NBC News, USA, Syfy, CNBC, MSNBC cable TV, NBC.com, MSNBC.com, iVillage, Bravo, qubo, SendMeRSS, Telemundo Television Studios, The Weather Channel, Hulu</p>
<p>me now &#8211; Locally: I am aware of influence from 12 NBC Universal units via Comcast .. and a local plant that SABIC acquired on 5/21/07 from GE&#8217;s Plastics Division in a $11.6 billion cash deal, including $8.7 billion of its liabilities .. and a wind farm working towards 166 turbines SE of here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: im1dc</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201303</link>
		<dc:creator>im1dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201303</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dan Gross wondered if the channel’s recent tilt to the right...&quot;

Dan is on the right track, but its more than the tilt to the right. It is the attitude of the hosts, or most of them, from Joe Kernan in the early morning to Kudlow, Maria B., Erin the B., the incredibly rude attorney who shall remain nameless and Michele C-C, et. al., that made CNBC unwatchable. I still turn it on but its on mute most of the time.

Even Rick Santelli disappointed me. I used to take the mute off whenever he came on but since his &quot;rant&quot; and the weeks of followup rants in support of his rant I no longer care what he has to say.

In my case, I surfed my cable channels and came up with BloombergTV.  

I lost respect for the above biz journalists and the channel precisely in proportion to what I have learned about their political leanings -- from their on air comments and the way they treat some guests.  

Previoulsy, I did not lose respect for Maria B. when she went on air with CEO Stanley Weil b/c she admitted up front that she held 10,000 shares of CitiCorp. The same thing about GE with Jack Welch in the past. I never lost respect for the others until they ceased to be even handed and challenge only the guests that held opposing views.

These people have become full of themselves and when they work for CNBC it shows up as bias and prejudice that darkens all the work they do and it damages the network and everyone who works there and therefore GE shareholders. Hey, it happens, people go bad just like heads of lettuce. Throw the rotten ones out. No one will miss them -- for long.

It really is unfair the to the many excellent biz journalists that work at CNBC that a few rotten but big name on air personalities are allowed to run down the entire organization. Its GM all over again. Even Dylan Ratigan jumped ship from the smug assholes. How embarrassing is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dan Gross wondered if the channel’s recent tilt to the right&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Dan is on the right track, but its more than the tilt to the right. It is the attitude of the hosts, or most of them, from Joe Kernan in the early morning to Kudlow, Maria B., Erin the B., the incredibly rude attorney who shall remain nameless and Michele C-C, et. al., that made CNBC unwatchable. I still turn it on but its on mute most of the time.</p>
<p>Even Rick Santelli disappointed me. I used to take the mute off whenever he came on but since his &#8220;rant&#8221; and the weeks of followup rants in support of his rant I no longer care what he has to say.</p>
<p>In my case, I surfed my cable channels and came up with BloombergTV.  </p>
<p>I lost respect for the above biz journalists and the channel precisely in proportion to what I have learned about their political leanings &#8212; from their on air comments and the way they treat some guests.  </p>
<p>Previoulsy, I did not lose respect for Maria B. when she went on air with CEO Stanley Weil b/c she admitted up front that she held 10,000 shares of CitiCorp. The same thing about GE with Jack Welch in the past. I never lost respect for the others until they ceased to be even handed and challenge only the guests that held opposing views.</p>
<p>These people have become full of themselves and when they work for CNBC it shows up as bias and prejudice that darkens all the work they do and it damages the network and everyone who works there and therefore GE shareholders. Hey, it happens, people go bad just like heads of lettuce. Throw the rotten ones out. No one will miss them &#8212; for long.</p>
<p>It really is unfair the to the many excellent biz journalists that work at CNBC that a few rotten but big name on air personalities are allowed to run down the entire organization. Its GM all over again. Even Dylan Ratigan jumped ship from the smug assholes. How embarrassing is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvdpenn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201270</link>
		<dc:creator>dvdpenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201270</guid>
		<description>I tend to watch Bloomberg 90% of the time.  I&#039;ll peek at Fast Money for Najarian.  But that&#039;s ab out as much CNBC as I can take.

It&#039;s not just the political tilt, it&#039;s the sophomoric nature of it.  I passed by CNBC today for about two minutes before I heard some commentator make a wise crack about &quot;if only the government could cut costs like the private sector has been doing.&quot;  Tired, but whatever.  But then to add &quot;And I can hear the amens from you guys in the back, amen is right&quot; is just tiresome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to watch Bloomberg 90% of the time.  I&#8217;ll peek at Fast Money for Najarian.  But that&#8217;s ab out as much CNBC as I can take.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just the political tilt, it&#8217;s the sophomoric nature of it.  I passed by CNBC today for about two minutes before I heard some commentator make a wise crack about &#8220;if only the government could cut costs like the private sector has been doing.&#8221;  Tired, but whatever.  But then to add &#8220;And I can hear the amens from you guys in the back, amen is right&#8221; is just tiresome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyk</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201258</link>
		<dc:creator>andyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201258</guid>
		<description>CNBC = culture of personality
Bloomberg = Just the facts, please
Cramer = self first, stock market distant second
Kudlow = wants to turn everything into a bubble
Kneale = what me worry?
Haynes = the world revolves around Jersey and just waiting to retire
Bartiromo = must have some going on with Hank Greenberg
Cabrera = headlights are too bright
Ratigan = good, but was too harsh (called one of his trader&#039;s a &quot;jerk&quot; on live TV)
Gasparino = &quot;tee martooni&#039;s pleesh&quot;
the rest of &#039;em are actually pretty decent because they just report the news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC = culture of personality<br />
Bloomberg = Just the facts, please<br />
Cramer = self first, stock market distant second<br />
Kudlow = wants to turn everything into a bubble<br />
Kneale = what me worry?<br />
Haynes = the world revolves around Jersey and just waiting to retire<br />
Bartiromo = must have some going on with Hank Greenberg<br />
Cabrera = headlights are too bright<br />
Ratigan = good, but was too harsh (called one of his trader&#8217;s a &#8220;jerk&#8221; on live TV)<br />
Gasparino = &#8220;tee martooni&#8217;s pleesh&#8221;<br />
the rest of &#8216;em are actually pretty decent because they just report the news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead hobo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201255</link>
		<dc:creator>dead hobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201255</guid>
		<description>Andy T Says:
August 6th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

Well….do we get the obligatory 3 min rally into the close to instill a sense of complete hopelessness for anyone who remains bearish after the failed attempt to sell off below 994 or will today brings us a new story…..

hope:
---------
The mother of all short opportunities will come once liquidity is removed, the official policy of pump is canceled, or the bubble bursts on it&#039;s own. If it comes from China, copper will tank horribly for a few days and continue on after that. If it comes from the US, the 10 year will blow past 4%. If it comes normally, it will be due to regulators taking back the markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy T Says:<br />
August 6th, 2009 at 3:51 pm</p>
<p>Well….do we get the obligatory 3 min rally into the close to instill a sense of complete hopelessness for anyone who remains bearish after the failed attempt to sell off below 994 or will today brings us a new story…..</p>
<p>hope:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
The mother of all short opportunities will come once liquidity is removed, the official policy of pump is canceled, or the bubble bursts on it&#8217;s own. If it comes from China, copper will tank horribly for a few days and continue on after that. If it comes from the US, the 10 year will blow past 4%. If it comes normally, it will be due to regulators taking back the markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeImwrong</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201226</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeImwrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201226</guid>
		<description>Shorts aren&#039;t confident yet = rally into close.

Shorts are scared of NFP response, but I don&#039;t think they need to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorts aren&#8217;t confident yet = rally into close.</p>
<p>Shorts are scared of NFP response, but I don&#8217;t think they need to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy T</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/08/why-cnbcs-ratings-are-down/comment-page-2/#comment-201224</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=34883#comment-201224</guid>
		<description>Well....do we get the obligatory 3 min rally into the close to instill a sense of complete hopelessness for anyone who remains bearish after the failed attempt to sell off below  994 or will today brings us a new story.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;.do we get the obligatory 3 min rally into the close to instill a sense of complete hopelessness for anyone who remains bearish after the failed attempt to sell off below  994 or will today brings us a new story&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

