<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Year Asset Class Returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ekonomija; Povrat po investicijskim klasama &#171; Eclectica</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218532</link>
		<dc:creator>Ekonomija; Povrat po investicijskim klasama &#171; Eclectica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218532</guid>
		<description>[...] je zanimljivo: povrat po investicijskim klasama u zadnjih 10 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] je zanimljivo: povrat po investicijskim klasama u zadnjih 10 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A day of sound, signifiying nothing - Steve Cook on Disciplined Investing - InvestorsInsight.com &#124; Financial Intelligence, Advice &#38; Research / Investment Strategies &#38; Planning for Individual Investors.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218507</link>
		<dc:creator>A day of sound, signifiying nothing - Steve Cook on Disciplined Investing - InvestorsInsight.com &#124; Financial Intelligence, Advice &#38; Research / Investment Strategies &#38; Planning for Individual Investors.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218507</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;&#160;&#160; Ten year asset class returns (graph):&#160;&#160;&#160; http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/&#160;&#160;&#160; Earlier this week I linked to an article by former market bear Jim Grant in which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ten year asset class returns (graph):&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/&nbsp;&nbsp;&#038;nbsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/&nbsp;&nbsp;&#038;nbsp</a>; Earlier this week I linked to an article by former market bear Jim Grant in which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Year Asset Class Returns for U.S. &#124; Value-Stock-Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218455</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Year Asset Class Returns for U.S. &#124; Value-Stock-Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218455</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: The Big PictureMore in the Article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: The Big PictureMore in the Article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218369</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218369</guid>
		<description>As others have inferred, who says the mean reversion is over?  Stocks went to an extreme extreme in 2000 and are just back to some sanity, except that the economic outlook is pathetic and so some more P/E (or other valuation metric, pick one) contraction is still in order.  These things tend to overshoot the mean, not bounce off them and go back to the extreme they were just at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have inferred, who says the mean reversion is over?  Stocks went to an extreme extreme in 2000 and are just back to some sanity, except that the economic outlook is pathetic and so some more P/E (or other valuation metric, pick one) contraction is still in order.  These things tend to overshoot the mean, not bounce off them and go back to the extreme they were just at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218366</link>
		<dc:creator>techy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218366</guid>
		<description>the wisdom of masses not much helpful.

but i dont blame you guys...even economist dont know $hit.

my opinion(based on reading a ton of blogs).

we are facing deflationary forces due to consumer de-leveraging which is being balance by FED printing press.

if speculation can be kept minimal....inflation/deflation should stay manageable =-10%.

but as we have seen speculation is such a bitch....anything can happen(oil=200 or oil=20, gold=$300 or $2000) etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the wisdom of masses not much helpful.</p>
<p>but i dont blame you guys&#8230;even economist dont know $hit.</p>
<p>my opinion(based on reading a ton of blogs).</p>
<p>we are facing deflationary forces due to consumer de-leveraging which is being balance by FED printing press.</p>
<p>if speculation can be kept minimal&#8230;.inflation/deflation should stay manageable =-10%.</p>
<p>but as we have seen speculation is such a bitch&#8230;.anything can happen(oil=200 or oil=20, gold=$300 or $2000) etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yankee19</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218342</link>
		<dc:creator>yankee19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218342</guid>
		<description>Chuck Ponzi wrote: &quot;Inflation is a general phenomenon: it affects all prices and all asset classes, so in that way Barry is more correct.&quot;

This is a ridiculous comment!  Crude oil has more than doubled off its&#039; lows while Natural Gas has been collapsing all year until the past 2 weeks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Ponzi wrote: &#8220;Inflation is a general phenomenon: it affects all prices and all asset classes, so in that way Barry is more correct.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a ridiculous comment!  Crude oil has more than doubled off its&#8217; lows while Natural Gas has been collapsing all year until the past 2 weeks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yankee19</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218333</link>
		<dc:creator>yankee19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218333</guid>
		<description>Anyone heard of currency debasement and monstrous fiscal deficits? Has anyone looked at government revenues versus obligations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone heard of currency debasement and monstrous fiscal deficits? Has anyone looked at government revenues versus obligations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexInNC</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218325</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexInNC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218325</guid>
		<description>From 9/1/99 to 8/31/99 I get -7.7% (cumulative) and -0.8% (annualized) for the S&amp;P 500 (incl dividends). What am I missing? Also, to be inclusive the chart should include EM equities, +135.6% (cumulative) and +9.1 (annualized) (using MSCI EM Index).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 9/1/99 to 8/31/99 I get -7.7% (cumulative) and -0.8% (annualized) for the S&amp;P 500 (incl dividends). What am I missing? Also, to be inclusive the chart should include EM equities, +135.6% (cumulative) and +9.1 (annualized) (using MSCI EM Index).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Common Man Sees It</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218323</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Common Man Sees It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218323</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you believe in mean reversion over the long term — and this is a 10 year chart — then you probably are cautious on Gold here and more constructive on equities for the next 10 years.&lt;/i&gt;

Well......maybe 20 years. We still have to work the boomers out of the markets and the shares out of the boomers

Secondly, how do you know that the last ten years of gold wasn&#039;t mean reversion to the upside? I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll remember, and if not you do realize that in the &#039;90&#039;s Greenspan actually made a statement that the Fed would do everything in it&#039;s power to keep the price of gold suppressed:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;central banks stand ready to lease gold in increasing quantities should the price rise.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;

From here:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/1998/19980724.htm

 That was when gold was around $250 and they were having a dog of a time keeping a lid on it because back then it was still believed that the POG was a reflection of inflation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you believe in mean reversion over the long term — and this is a 10 year chart — then you probably are cautious on Gold here and more constructive on equities for the next 10 years.</i></p>
<p>Well&#8230;&#8230;maybe 20 years. We still have to work the boomers out of the markets and the shares out of the boomers</p>
<p>Secondly, how do you know that the last ten years of gold wasn&#8217;t mean reversion to the upside? I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll remember, and if not you do realize that in the &#8217;90&#8242;s Greenspan actually made a statement that the Fed would do everything in it&#8217;s power to keep the price of gold suppressed:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;central banks stand ready to lease gold in increasing quantities should the price rise.&#8221; </i></p>
<p>From here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/1998/19980724.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/1998/19980724.htm</a></p>
<p> That was when gold was around $250 and they were having a dog of a time keeping a lid on it because back then it was still believed that the POG was a reflection of inflation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharkbait</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/10-year-asset-class-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-218297</link>
		<dc:creator>sharkbait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38978#comment-218297</guid>
		<description>S&amp;P 500 -50% in USD since 12/31/1999 (~10 yrs.) - vs. a basket of currencies.

S&amp;P 500 -79% in gold since 12/31/1999 (~10 yrs.)

Source: Michael Pento, Delta Global Advisors, 9/16/09</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;P 500 -50% in USD since 12/31/1999 (~10 yrs.) &#8211; vs. a basket of currencies.</p>
<p>S&amp;P 500 -79% in gold since 12/31/1999 (~10 yrs.)</p>
<p>Source: Michael Pento, Delta Global Advisors, 9/16/09</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

