<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Afternoon Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drey</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216404</link>
		<dc:creator>drey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216404</guid>
		<description>Agree that GOP bitterness and bile would have them do ANYTHING to discredit Obama, regardless of the merit of any particular policy initiative.  Just another sign of how far gone the political system (and bipartisanship of any kind) is...

Re: a single payer initiative, could they toss around the socialist/communist epithet any more than they have anyway?  Doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that GOP bitterness and bile would have them do ANYTHING to discredit Obama, regardless of the merit of any particular policy initiative.  Just another sign of how far gone the political system (and bipartisanship of any kind) is&#8230;</p>
<p>Re: a single payer initiative, could they toss around the socialist/communist epithet any more than they have anyway?  Doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216400</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216400</guid>
		<description>@drey

you may be right. i just think that the dems including obama saw the political price too high with single payer. the lunatic fringe on the right would just tarred and feathered him as a marxist without mercy. i&#039;m in complete agreement that conceding anything to the gop should have been a nonstarter. i&#039;m convinced that these fuckers would rather have another 9/11 than give obama a chance to claim credit for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@drey</p>
<p>you may be right. i just think that the dems including obama saw the political price too high with single payer. the lunatic fringe on the right would just tarred and feathered him as a marxist without mercy. i&#8217;m in complete agreement that conceding anything to the gop should have been a nonstarter. i&#8217;m convinced that these fuckers would rather have another 9/11 than give obama a chance to claim credit for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216397</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216397</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2009/09/mutual-fund-investors-cling-to-safety.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Trader Mark: Mutual Fund Investors Cling to Safety of Bonds, Missing Stock Rally - Pimco Total Return Fund (PTTAX) Benefits&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;90% of new money into mutual funds in 2009 is avoiding equities.&quot;

Interesting.  I believe the baby boomers have been burned one too many times, and all too many are looking at a very sparse retirement fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2009/09/mutual-fund-investors-cling-to-safety.html" rel="nofollow">Trader Mark: Mutual Fund Investors Cling to Safety of Bonds, Missing Stock Rally &#8211; Pimco Total Return Fund (PTTAX) Benefits</a></p>
<p>&#8220;90% of new money into mutual funds in 2009 is avoiding equities.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting.  I believe the baby boomers have been burned one too many times, and all too many are looking at a very sparse retirement fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drey</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216395</link>
		<dc:creator>drey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216395</guid>
		<description>@bubba

I don&#039;t agree for one second that Taibbi was too hard on the Dems or on Obama.  One of his best points was how, in a misguided attempt to reach out to the GOP (which they of course took as a sign of weakness) he took single payer off the table at the very beginning.  Had he used it more effectively as a bargaining chip instead of caving long before he  needed to, there is no doubt in my mind, given the public&#039;s level of disgust with the status quo, that a public option of some sort would have made it into the final bill.

As for Taibbi&#039;s expletives which seem to have offended some (one?) on the board, they pale in comparison to the obscenity which poses as our federal government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bubba</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree for one second that Taibbi was too hard on the Dems or on Obama.  One of his best points was how, in a misguided attempt to reach out to the GOP (which they of course took as a sign of weakness) he took single payer off the table at the very beginning.  Had he used it more effectively as a bargaining chip instead of caving long before he  needed to, there is no doubt in my mind, given the public&#8217;s level of disgust with the status quo, that a public option of some sort would have made it into the final bill.</p>
<p>As for Taibbi&#8217;s expletives which seem to have offended some (one?) on the board, they pale in comparison to the obscenity which poses as our federal government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216383</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216383</guid>
		<description>just had a chance to read the taibbi article. great piece of work. probably more intellectual rigor in any one of his sentences than all of frankie&#039;s drivels combined. although i must say, he is a bit unfairly harsh on the dems, and doesn&#039;t seem to recognize the political realities they face. the single payer system was never ever going to be politically viable, not when you have dumb stupid fucking moronic teabaggers crying socialism this and marxist that.

and if little frankie has a problem with my colorful choice of language he can shove it up his &quot;intelligent&quot; you know what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just had a chance to read the taibbi article. great piece of work. probably more intellectual rigor in any one of his sentences than all of frankie&#8217;s drivels combined. although i must say, he is a bit unfairly harsh on the dems, and doesn&#8217;t seem to recognize the political realities they face. the single payer system was never ever going to be politically viable, not when you have dumb stupid fucking moronic teabaggers crying socialism this and marxist that.</p>
<p>and if little frankie has a problem with my colorful choice of language he can shove it up his &#8220;intelligent&#8221; you know what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216382</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216382</guid>
		<description>onlooker-

the whole world is a bubble at this point-  a world wide collapse in the offing-

when?  don&#039;t know-  but the higher they force up markets-  the bigger the drop-

next leg down could be vomit inducing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>onlooker-</p>
<p>the whole world is a bubble at this point-  a world wide collapse in the offing-</p>
<p>when?  don&#8217;t know-  but the higher they force up markets-  the bigger the drop-</p>
<p>next leg down could be vomit inducing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216381</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216381</guid>
		<description>Thor 

I thought that you especially would be interested in this:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://pragcap.com/china-will-be-a-bigger-bubble-than-japan&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CHINA WILL BE A BIGGER BUBBLE THAN JAPAN&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thor </p>
<p>I thought that you especially would be interested in this:</p>
<p><a href="http://pragcap.com/china-will-be-a-bigger-bubble-than-japan" rel="nofollow">CHINA WILL BE A BIGGER BUBBLE THAN JAPAN</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216374</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216374</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whitney Tilson, the founder of T2 Partners, is widely known for predicting the mortgage meltdown. What does he see down the road from here?

He’s still bearish, very bearish. 

&quot;I&#039;m worried that investors are getting overly enthusiastic. They see a couple of month-to-month sequential home price increases, (and they get excited). We saw the exact same thing a year ago. Don&#039;t get faked out by the seasonality.&quot;

&quot;We think home prices have another year to go before they bottom and that&#039;s going to impact any stock that has exposure to the housing sector.&quot;

His outlook comes in stark contrast to what we&#039;ve been hearing from countless market mavens and even Fed Chief Ben Bernanke who all seem to agree the recession is over...&quot;
http://www.cnbc.com/id/32877931

for what&#039;s it Worth, I&#039;d go a&#039;wagerin&#039; With yon&#039; Tilson..
~~
and, this clip w/ Bob Diamond, from Barclay&#039;s, needs to be understood..
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1259093546&amp;play=1

He lays out, in so many words, what the Future will look like, if these current Trends are allowed to metastisize.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/metastasize
no &#039;c&#039; in metastasize..but, with these two pieces, at least, less BS in CNBC..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whitney Tilson, the founder of T2 Partners, is widely known for predicting the mortgage meltdown. What does he see down the road from here?</p>
<p>He’s still bearish, very bearish. </p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m worried that investors are getting overly enthusiastic. They see a couple of month-to-month sequential home price increases, (and they get excited). We saw the exact same thing a year ago. Don&#8217;t get faked out by the seasonality.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We think home prices have another year to go before they bottom and that&#8217;s going to impact any stock that has exposure to the housing sector.&#8221;</p>
<p>His outlook comes in stark contrast to what we&#8217;ve been hearing from countless market mavens and even Fed Chief Ben Bernanke who all seem to agree the recession is over&#8230;&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/32877931" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/32877931</a></p>
<p>for what&#8217;s it Worth, I&#8217;d go a&#8217;wagerin&#8217; With yon&#8217; Tilson..<br />
~~<br />
and, this clip w/ Bob Diamond, from Barclay&#8217;s, needs to be understood..<br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1259093546&#038;play=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1259093546&#038;play=1</a></p>
<p>He lays out, in so many words, what the Future will look like, if these current Trends are allowed to metastisize.<br />
<a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/metastasize" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/metastasize</a><br />
no &#8216;c&#8217; in metastasize..but, with these two pieces, at least, less BS in CNBC..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vstock3d</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216369</link>
		<dc:creator>Vstock3d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216369</guid>
		<description>ummm no post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm no post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: constantnormal</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/afternoon-reading-7/comment-page-2/#comment-216367</link>
		<dc:creator>constantnormal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38408#comment-216367</guid>
		<description>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-projected-health-insurance-premiums-for-family-coverage-2009-9?utm_source=Triggermail&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Clusterstock%20Chart%209%2F16

Best viewed with something to catch the vomit nearby.  The numbers ARE representative of today&#039;s per-family health insurance costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-projected-health-insurance-premiums-for-family-coverage-2009-9?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=Clusterstock%20Chart%209%2F16" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-projected-health-insurance-premiums-for-family-coverage-2009-9?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=Clusterstock%20Chart%209%2F16</a></p>
<p>Best viewed with something to catch the vomit nearby.  The numbers ARE representative of today&#8217;s per-family health insurance costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

