“I’m not being purposely bearish. I view it as almost a public service.”
-David Rosenberg, Gluskin Sheff
To date, 73% of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies reporting have beat Q2 earnings estimates. But as Robin Blumenthal points out this morning, “you would do well to ask: Which estimates?”
Robin references David Rosenberg’s commentary on the subject. Rosie says the good showing is a function of when the estimates were made. His estimates for Q2 earnings/share is $13.94 – 30% below what analysts consensus at the end of 2008.
December 2008 estimates for Q2 earnings were $19.92 — they were repeatedly sliced until they had fallen down to $14.15 as Q2 ended. While everyone seems to be excited about these beats, they are actually massive misses to the consensus just 2Qs ago. Year over year, earnings are down about 27% for Q2.
As to Q3 estimates — they are now down more than 30% to $14.57.
Given the market’s lofty levels, don’t expect the same celebration for beats of these reduced earnings . . .
Predicting a Grizzly Quarter
ROBIN GOLDWYN BLUMENTHAL
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.