<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faux capitalists look for the free lunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/faux-capitalists-look-for-the-free-lunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/faux-capitalists-look-for-the-free-lunch/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepakshenoy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/faux-capitalists-look-for-the-free-lunch/comment-page-1/#comment-221112</link>
		<dc:creator>deepakshenoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=38586#comment-221112</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d ordered a copy from Amazon when the book was released. And I&#039;ve not yet gotten to doing a review, unfortunately; but I think this review was too short. 

Some of the stuff you mention has weird parallels in India where bank nationalization (not pre-privatization, unfortunately) happened in the early 70s. The result: our political parties now take credit for the disaster that has been bank nationalization in the country, saying &quot;Look, the US is doing it now&quot;. And while we haven&#039;t fallen prey to rating agency disasters, government bailouts in crises are common here (and rather expected); from farmer loan forgiveness to hiding toxic waste in balance sheets, we&#039;ve done our bit. 

But as a reader from India, I must say your book was worth the read. The failure of the credit rating agencies had prompted a change our pension plan investment guidelines to not mandate a rating requirement for corp. bonds. http://blog.investraction.com/2009/02/hail-pension-policy-for-making-rating.html 

Unfortunately we went back to having the rating requirement partially back.http://blog.investraction.com/2009/02/hail-pension-policy-for-making-rating.html . There are too many vested interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d ordered a copy from Amazon when the book was released. And I&#8217;ve not yet gotten to doing a review, unfortunately; but I think this review was too short. </p>
<p>Some of the stuff you mention has weird parallels in India where bank nationalization (not pre-privatization, unfortunately) happened in the early 70s. The result: our political parties now take credit for the disaster that has been bank nationalization in the country, saying &#8220;Look, the US is doing it now&#8221;. And while we haven&#8217;t fallen prey to rating agency disasters, government bailouts in crises are common here (and rather expected); from farmer loan forgiveness to hiding toxic waste in balance sheets, we&#8217;ve done our bit. </p>
<p>But as a reader from India, I must say your book was worth the read. The failure of the credit rating agencies had prompted a change our pension plan investment guidelines to not mandate a rating requirement for corp. bonds. <a href="http://blog.investraction.com/2009/02/hail-pension-policy-for-making-rating.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.investraction.com/2009/02/hail-pension-policy-for-making-rating.html</a> </p>
<p>Unfortunately we went back to having the rating requirement partially back.http://blog.investraction.com/2009/02/hail-pension-policy-for-making-rating.html . There are too many vested interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

