<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal Savings Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Post &#171; Athreya Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-213210</link>
		<dc:creator>First Post &#171; Athreya Associates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-213210</guid>
		<description>[...] Cost of tax credit - homes and autos Personal savings rate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cost of tax credit &#8211; homes and autos Personal savings rate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odograph.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Savings Rate</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-211182</link>
		<dc:creator>Odograph.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Savings Rate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-211182</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark Warywoda of Addenda-Capital via The Big Picture: How is it was possible that debt-to-income ratios hadn’t improved much when the savings rate had gone up to 5%. The short answer is it comes down to the simple equation: Savings = DPI – personal outlays. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Warywoda of Addenda-Capital via The Big Picture: How is it was possible that debt-to-income ratios hadn’t improved much when the savings rate had gone up to 5%. The short answer is it comes down to the simple equation: Savings = DPI – personal outlays. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holulu</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-211130</link>
		<dc:creator>holulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-211130</guid>
		<description>Where is the link to this guy&#039;s article?   I like to read the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the link to this guy&#8217;s article?   I like to read the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-211123</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-211123</guid>
		<description>bazily: If I remember correctly, the data is in the flow of funds report, which is freely available from the Federal Reserve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bazily: If I remember correctly, the data is in the flow of funds report, which is freely available from the Federal Reserve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Time Reading: 2009-09-01 - Credit Writedowns</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-211113</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Time Reading: 2009-09-01 - Credit Writedowns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-211113</guid>
		<description>[...] Personal Savings Rate &#124; The Big Picture [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Personal Savings Rate | The Big Picture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bazily</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-211110</link>
		<dc:creator>bazily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-211110</guid>
		<description>would love to see the specfic data he&#039;s using for his definition of Personal Savings and calc the rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would love to see the specfic data he&#8217;s using for his definition of Personal Savings and calc the rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul S</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-211078</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-211078</guid>
		<description>Where do we get the top 1% number removed from this?  Is there any way to really do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do we get the top 1% number removed from this?  Is there any way to really do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-211004</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-211004</guid>
		<description>Props to Troy, I believe you have been saying this for a little while now.  Good eye. 

@flips:

(with apologies to that two-faced politician, what’s his name)

Um, Senator, er uh, Congressman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Props to Troy, I believe you have been saying this for a little while now.  Good eye. </p>
<p>@flips:</p>
<p>(with apologies to that two-faced politician, what’s his name)</p>
<p>Um, Senator, er uh, Congressman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flipspiceland</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-210958</link>
		<dc:creator>flipspiceland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-210958</guid>
		<description>Charts are so perfect  in the rear view mirror.

Just once I&#039;d like to see one as precise thru windshield.

(with apologies to that two-faced politician, what&#039;s his name)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charts are so perfect  in the rear view mirror.</p>
<p>Just once I&#8217;d like to see one as precise thru windshield.</p>
<p>(with apologies to that two-faced politician, what&#8217;s his name)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/personal-savings-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-210947</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=37221#comment-210947</guid>
		<description>Pat G.

Likewise.  And knowing that there are a very small number of real uber savers out there (doing a huge percentage of the overall savings), and seeing the terrible savings numbers, I&#039;ve been terrified to think what a large percentage of people are just terribly cash flow negative for such long periods of time (my SIL, exhibit A).  

And therefore what their net worth is (negative, maybe grossly so) and what their ability to sustain through any kind of adversity.  They&#039;re literally living on the edge, with more debt as their fall back plan.  

It&#039;s all thoroughly covered ground, but it&#039;s so central to our future.  And the notion that we can continue on without a very large and pretty extreme retrenchment period is just so naive, out of touch, or downright stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat G.</p>
<p>Likewise.  And knowing that there are a very small number of real uber savers out there (doing a huge percentage of the overall savings), and seeing the terrible savings numbers, I&#8217;ve been terrified to think what a large percentage of people are just terribly cash flow negative for such long periods of time (my SIL, exhibit A).  </p>
<p>And therefore what their net worth is (negative, maybe grossly so) and what their ability to sustain through any kind of adversity.  They&#8217;re literally living on the edge, with more debt as their fall back plan.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all thoroughly covered ground, but it&#8217;s so central to our future.  And the notion that we can continue on without a very large and pretty extreme retrenchment period is just so naive, out of touch, or downright stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

