<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crude Oil = $81</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankinomaha</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228502</link>
		<dc:creator>frankinomaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228502</guid>
		<description>Oil.   $90.50 is the 50% retracement of  the $148 high to the $33 low is.   The 61.8% retracement is $104.70.  Then could we see another leg down???   

Is there an annotated chart of oil?  Could I use a chart of oil in terms of the Euro as a quick and dirty substitute for constant $US?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oil.   $90.50 is the 50% retracement of  the $148 high to the $33 low is.   The 61.8% retracement is $104.70.  Then could we see another leg down???   </p>
<p>Is there an annotated chart of oil?  Could I use a chart of oil in terms of the Euro as a quick and dirty substitute for constant $US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228333</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228333</guid>
		<description>Ventura2012,

what kind of upside target do you have for AAPL?

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ventura2012,</p>
<p>what kind of upside target do you have for AAPL?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228322</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228322</guid>
		<description>@NCT, 

the way I read that post it was for profit, not protection, puts on lots of paper aren&#039;t exactly pricey right now, so there is a greater profit to be had using puts vs. the ETF&#039;s imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NCT, </p>
<p>the way I read that post it was for profit, not protection, puts on lots of paper aren&#8217;t exactly pricey right now, so there is a greater profit to be had using puts vs. the ETF&#8217;s imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston Munn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228303</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228303</guid>
		<description>Must take a shitload of oil to harvest all those green shoots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must take a shitload of oil to harvest all those green shoots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ventura2012</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ventura2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228294</guid>
		<description>Harry I will buy all the AAPL you have to sell.  AAPL has plenty of room to run.  Now WFC on the other hand..sold to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry I will buy all the AAPL you have to sell.  AAPL has plenty of room to run.  Now WFC on the other hand..sold to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRegan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228247</link>
		<dc:creator>MRegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228247</guid>
		<description>DeDude-

The most galling thing is that people WANT to work, to contribute, to build, but if the superstructure is designed to thieve present excedent value AND all future excedent value, then, hell, it ain&#039;t much of a party, is it?

Now how about that Tahoe-Vespa Credit Default Swap- she&#039;s a beaut!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeDude-</p>
<p>The most galling thing is that people WANT to work, to contribute, to build, but if the superstructure is designed to thieve present excedent value AND all future excedent value, then, hell, it ain&#8217;t much of a party, is it?</p>
<p>Now how about that Tahoe-Vespa Credit Default Swap- she&#8217;s a beaut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228234</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228234</guid>
		<description>MRegan; yes deflation in what we own, and inflation in what we need.  Those bastards sure know how to fock the middle class ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MRegan; yes deflation in what we own, and inflation in what we need.  Those bastards sure know how to fock the middle class ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NiceCriticalThinker</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228233</link>
		<dc:creator>NiceCriticalThinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228233</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,
Would you mind sharing the reason that you believe puts is better than say short ETF?  They both have time decay and leverage, right?

Thanks a lot!


Ben22 says:
fwiw, if you want to hold for a few weeks buy puts, not an ETF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,<br />
Would you mind sharing the reason that you believe puts is better than say short ETF?  They both have time decay and leverage, right?</p>
<p>Thanks a lot!</p>
<p>Ben22 says:<br />
fwiw, if you want to hold for a few weeks buy puts, not an ETF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRegan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228232</link>
		<dc:creator>MRegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228232</guid>
		<description>TBT was a buy yesterday. QID as well. I noted on Thursday last that BB&amp;T was going to get kicked in the kidneys- has since moved from 28s to mid 25s. More to come. CRE is a weak flank there, IMHO, DYODD.

On a bright note, CWV! Also, some people are looking at LCC (Lumina Copper). I have heard of calls for 3.50 Cu in short order. Function of the dollar&#039;s descent.

How about demand destruction and price inflation! Wow. Anybody want to trade a Tahoe for a Vespa?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBT was a buy yesterday. QID as well. I noted on Thursday last that BB&amp;T was going to get kicked in the kidneys- has since moved from 28s to mid 25s. More to come. CRE is a weak flank there, IMHO, DYODD.</p>
<p>On a bright note, CWV! Also, some people are looking at LCC (Lumina Copper). I have heard of calls for 3.50 Cu in short order. Function of the dollar&#8217;s descent.</p>
<p>How about demand destruction and price inflation! Wow. Anybody want to trade a Tahoe for a Vespa?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/crude-oil-81/comment-page-3/#comment-228230</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41840#comment-228230</guid>
		<description>HW makes a good point, today&#039;s Market action was Ugly.

There&#039;s been mucho Air blown into these Index levels, any Longs are right to be nimble..

Also, stop-losses can get blown by, Puts, on the other hand, not so much..

we should remember, as this Oil print is alluding to, Too many &#039;Dollars&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HW makes a good point, today&#8217;s Market action was Ugly.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been mucho Air blown into these Index levels, any Longs are right to be nimble..</p>
<p>Also, stop-losses can get blown by, Puts, on the other hand, not so much..</p>
<p>we should remember, as this Oil print is alluding to, Too many &#8216;Dollars&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

