<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobel Economics Prize Potential Winner Odds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunsacon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224717</link>
		<dc:creator>wunsacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224717</guid>
		<description>If you award a Nobel to me, I promise to do everything I can to earn it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you award a Nobel to me, I promise to do everything I can to earn it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmasand</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224714</link>
		<dc:creator>rmasand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224714</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s not on the list. A lad from Ladbroke&#039;s explained, on NPR, that Obama had started at 25/1 but ended up at 20/1 towards the end. Mankiw&#039;s Ladbroke list is just uh..broke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s not on the list. A lad from Ladbroke&#8217;s explained, on NPR, that Obama had started at 25/1 but ended up at 20/1 towards the end. Mankiw&#8217;s Ladbroke list is just uh..broke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madman130</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224698</link>
		<dc:creator>madman130</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224698</guid>
		<description>Barak Obama 1.9/1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barak Obama 1.9/1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen b</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224809</link>
		<dc:creator>owen b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224809</guid>
		<description>For those who suggested Roubini get the prize, please read this:

http://www.erictyson.com/articles/20081024_1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who suggested Roubini get the prize, please read this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.erictyson.com/articles/20081024_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.erictyson.com/articles/20081024_1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ironic Nobel Prize Award in Economics: Ostrom &#38; Williamson &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224801</link>
		<dc:creator>Ironic Nobel Prize Award in Economics: Ostrom &#38; Williamson &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224801</guid>
		<description>[...] we noted last night, Eugene Fama was the odds on favorite to win at thew various prediction markets at 2 to 1. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we noted last night, Eugene Fama was the odds on favorite to win at thew various prediction markets at 2 to 1. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224796</link>
		<dc:creator>The Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224796</guid>
		<description>The most valuable use of Mr. Nobel&#039;s invention would be to blast the Nobel prize--our modern-day version of sainthood in our hubristic worship of the human intellect--to oblivion.  

Who really gives a damn?  After awarding a peace prize to a man whose singular accomplishment was having the proper mix of black and white genes to make him electable against an aging representative of a regime forlorn of new ideas, why should anyone care who gets what Nobel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most valuable use of Mr. Nobel&#8217;s invention would be to blast the Nobel prize&#8211;our modern-day version of sainthood in our hubristic worship of the human intellect&#8211;to oblivion.  </p>
<p>Who really gives a damn?  After awarding a peace prize to a man whose singular accomplishment was having the proper mix of black and white genes to make him electable against an aging representative of a regime forlorn of new ideas, why should anyone care who gets what Nobel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday links: fear of the unknown Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224795</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday links: fear of the unknown Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224795</guid>
		<description>[...] pair of 50/1 shots win the Nobel prize in Economics. (WSJ, Clusterstock, Real Time Economics, EconLog, Marginal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pair of 50/1 shots win the Nobel prize in Economics. (WSJ, Clusterstock, Real Time Economics, EconLog, Marginal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Schott</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224794</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Schott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224794</guid>
		<description>Ostrom and Williamson - 2, 50:1 shots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ostrom and Williamson &#8211; 2, 50:1 shots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellyD3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224792</link>
		<dc:creator>KellyD3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224792</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that Lawrence Yun (The Big Picture&#039;s favorite economist) is not on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that Lawrence Yun (The Big Picture&#8217;s favorite economist) is not on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: number2son</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/economic-nobel-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-224790</link>
		<dc:creator>number2son</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40917#comment-224790</guid>
		<description>What, no odds on Larry Summers? After Paul Lizza&#039;s fawning encomium in last week&#039;s New Yorker (see http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/12/091012fa_fact_lizza), you&#039;d think he&#039;d have some pretty good odds.

Honestly, after reading that article I am sorely tempted to cancel my subscription. It is the worst example of critical journalism I have ever suffered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, no odds on Larry Summers? After Paul Lizza&#8217;s fawning encomium in last week&#8217;s New Yorker (see <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/12/091012fa_fact_lizza)" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/12/091012fa_fact_lizza)</a>, you&#8217;d think he&#8217;d have some pretty good odds.</p>
<p>Honestly, after reading that article I am sorely tempted to cancel my subscription. It is the worst example of critical journalism I have ever suffered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

