<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Recession Over ? (Extended Transition Phase)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q3 GDP Slips Further to 2.2% &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-243613</link>
		<dc:creator>Q3 GDP Slips Further to 2.2% &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-243613</guid>
		<description>[...] Is the Recession Over ? Extended Transition Phase  (October 29th, 2009) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is the Recession Over ? Extended Transition Phase  (October 29th, 2009) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDP Grew 3.5% During Q3. What Does That Really Mean? &#124; Technology you can trust here...</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230675</link>
		<dc:creator>GDP Grew 3.5% During Q3. What Does That Really Mean? &#124; Technology you can trust here...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230675</guid>
		<description>[...] Barry Ritholz assesses the conclusion that the GDP numbers mean an end to the Great Recession: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barry Ritholz assesses the conclusion that the GDP numbers mean an end to the Great Recession: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hooray For Growth; So, Where&#8217;s My Job?</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230536</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hooray For Growth; So, Where&#8217;s My Job?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230536</guid>
		<description>[...] the National Bureau of Economic Research uses to define a recession, FusionIQ CEO Barry Ritholtz writes at The Big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the National Bureau of Economic Research uses to define a recession, FusionIQ CEO Barry Ritholtz writes at The Big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franklin411</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230518</link>
		<dc:creator>franklin411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230518</guid>
		<description>But but but what happened to the right wing economic theory that government spending actually hampers GDP growth because it allegedly crowds out private investment?  How can Cash for Clunkers be causing the recovery and at the same time be hampering it?  If Cash for Clunkers is producing the recovery we&#039;re seeing now, shouldn&#039;t we extend and expand this and other programs?  How about a massive government hiring program to put people to work doing necessary jobs (preschool, processing GI Bill benefits, etc..)?

Milton Friedman drove us from January 1981 to January 2009.  Thank God he is nothing but a rotten corpse today.

Viva Keynes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But but but what happened to the right wing economic theory that government spending actually hampers GDP growth because it allegedly crowds out private investment?  How can Cash for Clunkers be causing the recovery and at the same time be hampering it?  If Cash for Clunkers is producing the recovery we&#8217;re seeing now, shouldn&#8217;t we extend and expand this and other programs?  How about a massive government hiring program to put people to work doing necessary jobs (preschool, processing GI Bill benefits, etc..)?</p>
<p>Milton Friedman drove us from January 1981 to January 2009.  Thank God he is nothing but a rotten corpse today.</p>
<p>Viva Keynes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDP Grew 3.5% During Q3. What Does That Really Mean? &#124; Business Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230506</link>
		<dc:creator>GDP Grew 3.5% During Q3. What Does That Really Mean? &#124; Business Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230506</guid>
		<description>[...] Barry Ritholz assesses the conclusion that the GDP numbers mean an end to the Great Recession: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barry Ritholz assesses the conclusion that the GDP numbers mean an end to the Great Recession: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: on the GDP&#8230; &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230493</link>
		<dc:creator>on the GDP&#8230; &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230493</guid>
		<description>[...] of this number.  Nor do I think we should declare The Great Recession a thing of the past.  Barry Ritholtz writes: If we look at the 5 factors NBER considers — GDP, real income, employment, industrial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of this number.  Nor do I think we should declare The Great Recession a thing of the past.  Barry Ritholtz writes: If we look at the 5 factors NBER considers — GDP, real income, employment, industrial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230481</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230481</guid>
		<description>They are not going to call an end to this recession until we have flat employment.  At least, they shouldn&#039;t.  

It is BS when we have a growing economy but flat employment.  Who in the hell cares about GDP unless we have growing jobs and wages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not going to call an end to this recession until we have flat employment.  At least, they shouldn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>It is BS when we have a growing economy but flat employment.  Who in the hell cares about GDP unless we have growing jobs and wages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big GDP Number: 3.5% &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230476</link>
		<dc:creator>Big GDP Number: 3.5% &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230476</guid>
		<description>[...] incentivizing, or bailing out various sectors: Autos, Residential RE, and Fed spending. As expected, Inventory reduction helped, and unexpectedly, increasing imports [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] incentivizing, or bailing out various sectors: Autos, Residential RE, and Fed spending. As expected, Inventory reduction helped, and unexpectedly, increasing imports [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big GDP Number: 3.5% &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230477</link>
		<dc:creator>Big GDP Number: 3.5% &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230477</guid>
		<description>[...] incentivizing, or bailing out various sectors: Autos, Residential RE, and Fed spending. As expected, Inventory reduction helped, and unexpectedly, increasing imports [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] incentivizing, or bailing out various sectors: Autos, Residential RE, and Fed spending. As expected, Inventory reduction helped, and unexpectedly, increasing imports [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashpelham2</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/is-the-recession-over-extended-transition-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-230468</link>
		<dc:creator>ashpelham2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42609#comment-230468</guid>
		<description>It all seems so simple to a common man like myself.....We&#039;ve been working to cut costs at the top level all the way down to the grocery isle for years.  We&#039;ve reached the point where if we expect to pay less for goods and services, there cannot be meaningful gains in employment.  You do not get &quot;less&quot; with &quot;more&quot;.  I liken it to diet food companies telling you to buy their foods to lose weight.  You don&#039;t lose weight by eating, and you don&#039;t lose costs at the manufacturing/service level by hiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all seems so simple to a common man like myself&#8230;..We&#8217;ve been working to cut costs at the top level all the way down to the grocery isle for years.  We&#8217;ve reached the point where if we expect to pay less for goods and services, there cannot be meaningful gains in employment.  You do not get &#8220;less&#8221; with &#8220;more&#8221;.  I liken it to diet food companies telling you to buy their foods to lose weight.  You don&#8217;t lose weight by eating, and you don&#8217;t lose costs at the manufacturing/service level by hiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

