<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King: Break Up Big Banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsneath</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-228226</link>
		<dc:creator>bsneath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-228226</guid>
		<description>I got some really nice tulips......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got some really nice tulips&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vine2wine</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-228094</link>
		<dc:creator>vine2wine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-228094</guid>
		<description>Lets just go back to trading spices again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets just go back to trading spices again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-228000</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-228000</guid>
		<description>@ philipat

I see a return to the Gold standard as only being effective in reigning in fiscal responsibility (spending).  Graft and corruption are the result of human behavioral traits (greed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ philipat</p>
<p>I see a return to the Gold standard as only being effective in reigning in fiscal responsibility (spending).  Graft and corruption are the result of human behavioral traits (greed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philipat</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-227989</link>
		<dc:creator>philipat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-227989</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t a retrun to the Gold standard the only way to exert some control over our totally corrupt political and Governance system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t a retrun to the Gold standard the only way to exert some control over our totally corrupt political and Governance system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsneath</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-227972</link>
		<dc:creator>bsneath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-227972</guid>
		<description>I guess Obama has a judgment call to make.  &quot;Will I win more votes with bankers money than I lose from disgusted independents, moderates and traditional working class Democrats who see me as a puppet of Wall Street and a purveyor of elitist ideals at the expense of domestic jobs?&quot;

&quot;The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 27% of the nation&#039;s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -13. That’s just a point above the lowest level ever recorded for this President.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Obama has a judgment call to make.  &#8220;Will I win more votes with bankers money than I lose from disgusted independents, moderates and traditional working class Democrats who see me as a puppet of Wall Street and a purveyor of elitist ideals at the expense of domestic jobs?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 27% of the nation&#8217;s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -13. That’s just a point above the lowest level ever recorded for this President.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-227962</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-227962</guid>
		<description>Wall Street + Political Graft/Corruption = NO Reform</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall Street + Political Graft/Corruption = NO Reform</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-227957</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-227957</guid>
		<description>@danm:

disrememberation is common enough now...and misdisrememberation is getting more common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@danm:</p>
<p>disrememberation is common enough now&#8230;and misdisrememberation is getting more common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-227937</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-227937</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, I just remembered...  Bernanke was hired to not remake any of the mistakes of the 30s.  I guess part of his experiment is to make banks bigger.  And wouldn&#039;t it be lovely if he got them to merge with insurance companies.  Bankers could finally really understand the underwriting risks since they&#039;d know their clients full picture including health concernes.  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, I just remembered&#8230;  Bernanke was hired to not remake any of the mistakes of the 30s.  I guess part of his experiment is to make banks bigger.  And wouldn&#8217;t it be lovely if he got them to merge with insurance companies.  Bankers could finally really understand the underwriting risks since they&#8217;d know their clients full picture including health concernes.  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-227935</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-227935</guid>
		<description>This is a royal farce.  Isn&#039;t it Déjà Vu all over again...

Banking Act of 1933 

A Congressional act designed to restore financial stability to the country during the Great Depression, through the creation of federal deposit insurance and the separation of commercial banking and investment banking through the Glass-Steagall Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a royal farce.  Isn&#8217;t it Déjà Vu all over again&#8230;</p>
<p>Banking Act of 1933 </p>
<p>A Congressional act designed to restore financial stability to the country during the Great Depression, through the creation of federal deposit insurance and the separation of commercial banking and investment banking through the Glass-Steagall Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsneath</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/king/comment-page-1/#comment-227931</link>
		<dc:creator>bsneath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=41769#comment-227931</guid>
		<description>&quot;the math just doesn’t work out&quot;  I&#039;ll bet there are some bankers over at Goldman Sachs who would dispute this statement.  They have run the numbers on their bonuses and the math works out pretty good......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the math just doesn’t work out&#8221;  I&#8217;ll bet there are some bankers over at Goldman Sachs who would dispute this statement.  They have run the numbers on their bonuses and the math works out pretty good&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

