<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Wins 2009 Nobel Peace Prize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:58:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timotheus</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224940</link>
		<dc:creator>Timotheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224940</guid>
		<description>Dave Letterman is now being considered for next year&#039;s award, but I think Michael Jackson has got the edge on him.  It&#039;s gonna be a nail biter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Letterman is now being considered for next year&#8217;s award, but I think Michael Jackson has got the edge on him.  It&#8217;s gonna be a nail biter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224314</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224314</guid>
		<description>JimmyP you know what I yelled at the tube previous your seg .. &quot;there is no where to de-invest of your system&quot; &quot;we&#039;re captive&quot; ... if we save via bank accounts .. super-corps still get ahold of the cash anyway .. and do as they see fit (of course they do have to pay it back with interest)(as long as bankruptcy is not massively bailed out)

the 80s and 90s our cash store was invested massively abroad to bring the rest of world up to our standard of living and suplanted with more and more credit to blind us to American prosperity .. only thing is religion is coming back ..  we woke up and realized we sold the factories and now its a fact that the rebalancing is downward for J6P .. except for the pro paper pushers .. well thats the religion some still believe .. some here at TBP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JimmyP you know what I yelled at the tube previous your seg .. &#8220;there is no where to de-invest of your system&#8221; &#8220;we&#8217;re captive&#8221; &#8230; if we save via bank accounts .. super-corps still get ahold of the cash anyway .. and do as they see fit (of course they do have to pay it back with interest)(as long as bankruptcy is not massively bailed out)</p>
<p>the 80s and 90s our cash store was invested massively abroad to bring the rest of world up to our standard of living and suplanted with more and more credit to blind us to American prosperity .. only thing is religion is coming back ..  we woke up and realized we sold the factories and now its a fact that the rebalancing is downward for J6P .. except for the pro paper pushers .. well thats the religion some still believe .. some here at TBP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224305</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224305</guid>
		<description>Hey did you guys hear the good news? Yes Michael Jackson has been nominated for the 2010 Noble Peace Prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey did you guys hear the good news? Yes Michael Jackson has been nominated for the 2010 Noble Peace Prize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224262</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224262</guid>
		<description>LOL .. hi JimmyP .. getting tuned up for Kudlow tonight? your a top of the lot debater for Capitalism so I&#039;ll dull the Fa..ist to a more pc &quot;corporatist&quot; ... free markets ? strong arm for oil ? cash flow nukes ?

I&#039;m a J6P and I checked in the middle of the Bush2 years if Canada would take me in. The requests/requirements to be fast-tracked with citizenship (from memory) (and I don&#039;t get paid by any lobby to blog here) 1. high value tradesmen (doctor - engineer) 2. valued businessman (with money) 3. political refugee

I kinda feel stuck here in the USA .. and we need a balance here .. in this super-corporatist world in which high outlays are required to make any sort of widget .. and face the pricing power of the existing super-corp once the startup comes online .. beyond that the insider coexistance and false flag operations that can tank any new startup by performing a run on the stock .... I guess I could be a soup and stew startup and take on MikeyDs .. what a plan .. I&#039;m starting right now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL .. hi JimmyP .. getting tuned up for Kudlow tonight? your a top of the lot debater for Capitalism so I&#8217;ll dull the Fa..ist to a more pc &#8220;corporatist&#8221; &#8230; free markets ? strong arm for oil ? cash flow nukes ?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a J6P and I checked in the middle of the Bush2 years if Canada would take me in. The requests/requirements to be fast-tracked with citizenship (from memory) (and I don&#8217;t get paid by any lobby to blog here) 1. high value tradesmen (doctor &#8211; engineer) 2. valued businessman (with money) 3. political refugee</p>
<p>I kinda feel stuck here in the USA .. and we need a balance here .. in this super-corporatist world in which high outlays are required to make any sort of widget .. and face the pricing power of the existing super-corp once the startup comes online .. beyond that the insider coexistance and false flag operations that can tank any new startup by performing a run on the stock &#8230;. I guess I could be a soup and stew startup and take on MikeyDs .. what a plan .. I&#8217;m starting right now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffgronwol</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224261</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffgronwol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224261</guid>
		<description>Apparently, Affirmative Action is alive and well at the Nobel Prize factory.  Since the deadline for nominations was Feb 1st, he must have really impressed them with his 2 weeks in office, or the writeup was done really well.  The other problem is that a lot of very deserving folks have received this award in the past, and it cheapens their contributions and awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Affirmative Action is alive and well at the Nobel Prize factory.  Since the deadline for nominations was Feb 1st, he must have really impressed them with his 2 weeks in office, or the writeup was done really well.  The other problem is that a lot of very deserving folks have received this award in the past, and it cheapens their contributions and awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PithyDog</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224259</link>
		<dc:creator>PithyDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224259</guid>
		<description>The Nobel Prize To Obama: Europe&#039;s Bid To Re-Colonize America

Published on   http://DickMorris.com  on October 9, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nobel Prize To Obama: Europe&#8217;s Bid To Re-Colonize America</p>
<p>Published on   <a href="http://DickMorris.com" rel="nofollow">http://DickMorris.com</a>  on October 9, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: basquebob</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224251</link>
		<dc:creator>basquebob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224251</guid>
		<description>Nobel Prize .... 10,000,000 SEK

hearing ideologues&#039; heads explode ... priceless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobel Prize &#8230;. 10,000,000 SEK</p>
<p>hearing ideologues&#8217; heads explode &#8230; priceless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Pethokoukis</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224228</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pethokoukis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224228</guid>
		<description>How Obama can earn that Nobel Peace Prize







The Nobel Committee in Norway says it awarded President Barack Obama the 2009 Peace Prize for “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” (Congratulations, Mr. President.) In particular, the committee noted Obama’s multilateral approach on the issues of climate chance and nuclear disarmament.

But where has the president been when it comes to using diplomacy and cooperation to promote global trade, which is essential to global peace and prosperity? Given the infamous role of protectionism in the Great Depression, it’s no surprise that open and expanded trade has been at the core of the post-World War Two economic order, particularly during the past two decades.

The Great Recession, though, has shattered that consensus. An analysis by economists Barry Eichengreen and Kevin O’Rourke has calculated that “world trade is falling much faster now than in 1929-30.” Paul Krugman says trade “has fallen through the floor in a way that it literally never has before, including in the Great Depression.” Global Trade Alert, a trade watchdog group with links to the World Bank, found at least 121 protectionist measures had been implemented by G-20 nations during the past year.

Just of late, the EU imposed anti-dumping duties on steel pipe from China, while Australia may impose ownership limits on foreign buyers of big companies. “So far, traditional trade protectionism has been a low-grade fever,” said World Bank President Robert Zoellick said in a recent speech. “But the temperature is rising.”

And actions by the Obama administration and Congress show that America is hardly immune. Indeed, they have been spreading the disease. Among the protectionist outbreaks: The “Buy American” provisions in the $787 billion stimulus package, the blocking of Mexican trucks from U.S highways, the G.M. and Ford bailouts, inaction on pending free-trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea, tariffs on Chinese tires.

An American administration that seems disinterested in free trade? “You can drop the word ’seems,’” says Bruce Josten, head of governmental affairs for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Looking for an explanation? Here’s one: Bad economics makes for convenient politics. Since the Obamacrats might not be able to deliver the top two items on Big Labor’s wish list — reopening the North American Free Trade Agreement and passing rules making it easier to organize workplaces — they’re giving union supporters just about everything else.

Obama’s political advisers may not understand the importance of free trade, but his economic ones do. Obama should listen to them and begin to lead. Give Congress the greenlight to pass the free-trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea. Commit to getting the Doha trade round concluded within a year. The centrist Democratic Leadership Council also suggests that Obama reconnect trade to national security by asking Congress for a broad long-term waiver of tariffs for low-income countries and large majority-Muslim-majority states. Instead of increasing boosting aid to Pakistan, for instance, why not eliminate $360 million a year in tariffs on its exports?.

If Obama did all that, not only would he actually be worthy of the Peace Prize, but probably the Nobel Prize for Economics as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How Obama can earn that Nobel Peace Prize</p>
<p>The Nobel Committee in Norway says it awarded President Barack Obama the 2009 Peace Prize for “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” (Congratulations, Mr. President.) In particular, the committee noted Obama’s multilateral approach on the issues of climate chance and nuclear disarmament.</p>
<p>But where has the president been when it comes to using diplomacy and cooperation to promote global trade, which is essential to global peace and prosperity? Given the infamous role of protectionism in the Great Depression, it’s no surprise that open and expanded trade has been at the core of the post-World War Two economic order, particularly during the past two decades.</p>
<p>The Great Recession, though, has shattered that consensus. An analysis by economists Barry Eichengreen and Kevin O’Rourke has calculated that “world trade is falling much faster now than in 1929-30.” Paul Krugman says trade “has fallen through the floor in a way that it literally never has before, including in the Great Depression.” Global Trade Alert, a trade watchdog group with links to the World Bank, found at least 121 protectionist measures had been implemented by G-20 nations during the past year.</p>
<p>Just of late, the EU imposed anti-dumping duties on steel pipe from China, while Australia may impose ownership limits on foreign buyers of big companies. “So far, traditional trade protectionism has been a low-grade fever,” said World Bank President Robert Zoellick said in a recent speech. “But the temperature is rising.”</p>
<p>And actions by the Obama administration and Congress show that America is hardly immune. Indeed, they have been spreading the disease. Among the protectionist outbreaks: The “Buy American” provisions in the $787 billion stimulus package, the blocking of Mexican trucks from U.S highways, the G.M. and Ford bailouts, inaction on pending free-trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea, tariffs on Chinese tires.</p>
<p>An American administration that seems disinterested in free trade? “You can drop the word ’seems,’” says Bruce Josten, head of governmental affairs for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.</p>
<p>Looking for an explanation? Here’s one: Bad economics makes for convenient politics. Since the Obamacrats might not be able to deliver the top two items on Big Labor’s wish list — reopening the North American Free Trade Agreement and passing rules making it easier to organize workplaces — they’re giving union supporters just about everything else.</p>
<p>Obama’s political advisers may not understand the importance of free trade, but his economic ones do. Obama should listen to them and begin to lead. Give Congress the greenlight to pass the free-trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea. Commit to getting the Doha trade round concluded within a year. The centrist Democratic Leadership Council also suggests that Obama reconnect trade to national security by asking Congress for a broad long-term waiver of tariffs for low-income countries and large majority-Muslim-majority states. Instead of increasing boosting aid to Pakistan, for instance, why not eliminate $360 million a year in tariffs on its exports?.</p>
<p>If Obama did all that, not only would he actually be worthy of the Peace Prize, but probably the Nobel Prize for Economics as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224226</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224226</guid>
		<description>It was actually the nomination that came 11 days after he got into office.  The decision to actually give it to him came much later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was actually the nomination that came 11 days after he got into office.  The decision to actually give it to him came much later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/obama-wins-2009-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-3/#comment-224221</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40644#comment-224221</guid>
		<description>Two gun Palin hah - that makes me think of the SNL skit - PEW PEW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two gun Palin hah &#8211; that makes me think of the SNL skit &#8211; PEW PEW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
