<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ongoing Credit Contraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:05:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224485</link>
		<dc:creator>CDizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224485</guid>
		<description>Good to see the H&amp;S pattern ain&#039;t dead yet. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see the H&amp;S pattern ain&#8217;t dead yet. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224297</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224297</guid>
		<description>@Ben22 - But can&#039;t they just sweep the credit contraction under the rug like everything esle and call it good, because I don&#039;t want anything getting in the way of this boom  cycle we got going on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben22 &#8211; But can&#8217;t they just sweep the credit contraction under the rug like everything esle and call it good, because I don&#8217;t want anything getting in the way of this boom  cycle we got going on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skysurfer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224218</link>
		<dc:creator>skysurfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224218</guid>
		<description>Why is everybody all surprised that retail sales were good in September?  We had a late labor day and thus a later back to school for a significant part of the nation.  Late enough that one could wait until September to start school purchases.  I know that we waited until after school started to buy school supplies, so we could make one trip.  If Easter is in March, everyone makes a big deal about retail sales being skewed.  Why not the same intellectual honesty when a much bigger retail event, back-to-school, is later than normal?  Oh, yeah!  It wouldn&#039;t be a &quot;green shoot&quot;.  In case your wondering, I paid cash only and about half of what we did last year due to some screaming deals.  I love me some deflation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everybody all surprised that retail sales were good in September?  We had a late labor day and thus a later back to school for a significant part of the nation.  Late enough that one could wait until September to start school purchases.  I know that we waited until after school started to buy school supplies, so we could make one trip.  If Easter is in March, everyone makes a big deal about retail sales being skewed.  Why not the same intellectual honesty when a much bigger retail event, back-to-school, is later than normal?  Oh, yeah!  It wouldn&#8217;t be a &#8220;green shoot&#8221;.  In case your wondering, I paid cash only and about half of what we did last year due to some screaming deals.  I love me some deflation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kort</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224208</link>
		<dc:creator>Kort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224208</guid>
		<description>You can have the best retail in 10 months because the prior 9 months were terrible and it&#039;s back to school.  People who couldn&#039;t afford (job loss, no credit card) to buy earlier still aren&#039;t buying.  People buying now are people with some means and/or aren&#039;t scared.

It&#039;s like...Months 1 through 9: nobody spends
Month 10...some people spend a few dollars.
Presto, month 10 is the BEST!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have the best retail in 10 months because the prior 9 months were terrible and it&#8217;s back to school.  People who couldn&#8217;t afford (job loss, no credit card) to buy earlier still aren&#8217;t buying.  People buying now are people with some means and/or aren&#8217;t scared.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like&#8230;Months 1 through 9: nobody spends<br />
Month 10&#8230;some people spend a few dollars.<br />
Presto, month 10 is the BEST!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224184</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224184</guid>
		<description>Harry Wanger says:

&quot;I don’t quite get the credit contraction’s role in this economic recovery. &quot;

Well, that would explain everything then wouldn&#039;t it.  You manage OPM?  Wow....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Wanger says:</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t quite get the credit contraction’s role in this economic recovery. &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that would explain everything then wouldn&#8217;t it.  You manage OPM?  Wow&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rootless_cosmopolitan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224178</link>
		<dc:creator>rootless_cosmopolitan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224178</guid>
		<description>Harry Wanger,

&quot;The link referencing percentage change is much more telling. Although I’m not sure if that reflects inflation or nominal dollar terms that the percentage is based upon.&quot;

This is based on nominal data. You make a valid point here. I agree that there would be more information in normalized data. One could also normalize the change in credit relative to nominal GDP. After all, it&#039;s the debt relative to income what&#039;s important for the ability to load on more debt and to pay off debt and interest.

rc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Wanger,</p>
<p>&#8220;The link referencing percentage change is much more telling. Although I’m not sure if that reflects inflation or nominal dollar terms that the percentage is based upon.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is based on nominal data. You make a valid point here. I agree that there would be more information in normalized data. One could also normalize the change in credit relative to nominal GDP. After all, it&#8217;s the debt relative to income what&#8217;s important for the ability to load on more debt and to pay off debt and interest.</p>
<p>rc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarryWanger</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224174</link>
		<dc:creator>HarryWanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224174</guid>
		<description>socajoe: The link referencing percentage change is much more telling. Although I&#039;m not sure if that reflects inflation or nominal dollar terms that the percentage is based upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>socajoe: The link referencing percentage change is much more telling. Although I&#8217;m not sure if that reflects inflation or nominal dollar terms that the percentage is based upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rootless_cosmopolitan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224172</link>
		<dc:creator>rootless_cosmopolitan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224172</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot to mention that the 25 trillion dollars of household and business debt is the amount w/o the debt of financial institutions. With financial institution, private debt amounts to 41 trillion dollars.

rc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot to mention that the 25 trillion dollars of household and business debt is the amount w/o the debt of financial institutions. With financial institution, private debt amounts to 41 trillion dollars.</p>
<p>rc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socaljoe</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224171</link>
		<dc:creator>socaljoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224171</guid>
		<description>A chart showing 60 years of data is meaningless if presented in nominal dollar terms. I suspect, normalized for inflation, it would be much less &quot;astonishing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A chart showing 60 years of data is meaningless if presented in nominal dollar terms. I suspect, normalized for inflation, it would be much less &#8220;astonishing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarryWanger</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/ongoing-credit-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-224170</link>
		<dc:creator>HarryWanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=40695#comment-224170</guid>
		<description>A bit off topic but any ideas about what to infer regarding GDP from today&#039;s trade numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit off topic but any ideas about what to infer regarding GDP from today&#8217;s trade numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

