<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosner Says Stability Act Would Hurt Small, Medium Banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/rosner-says-stability-act-would-hurt-small-medium-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/rosner-says-stability-act-would-hurt-small-medium-banks/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/rosner-says-stability-act-would-hurt-small-medium-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-231130</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42813#comment-231130</guid>
		<description>2nd link winds up here http://mail.fusioninvest.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/congress-and-tbtf-%25E2%2580%2593-bring-in-the-bomb-squad/

requiring log-in..
~~
past that, this - &quot;This is another avoidance of the reality of the problem.&quot; re: &#039;Financial Stability Act&#039;, is all one, really, needs to know about it.

and, this &quot;...Those who argue against a more proactive reduction in risk and size of TBTF institutions will, as always, revert to an argument that strikes a natural chord in every American’s heart: ‘Doing so would create an unleveled international playing field for our institutions relative to their international competitors.’ Level playing fields are a worthy goal, but this is not a relevant argument. Instead, this tired bromide must be resoundingly dismissed on several counts: (and their enumeration)...&quot; should be, plenty, galvanizing for those wishing to steel themselves against the welter of BS being bought by, and disseminated for, those &#039;Financial Institutions&#039; that should, in a more *Perfect World, be BK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd link winds up here <a href="http://mail.fusioninvest.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/congress-and-tbtf-%25E2%2580%2593-bring-in-the-bomb-squad/" rel="nofollow">http://mail.fusioninvest.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/congress-and-tbtf-%25E2%2580%2593-bring-in-the-bomb-squad/</a></p>
<p>requiring log-in..<br />
~~<br />
past that, this &#8211; &#8220;This is another avoidance of the reality of the problem.&#8221; re: &#8216;Financial Stability Act&#8217;, is all one, really, needs to know about it.</p>
<p>and, this &#8220;&#8230;Those who argue against a more proactive reduction in risk and size of TBTF institutions will, as always, revert to an argument that strikes a natural chord in every American’s heart: ‘Doing so would create an unleveled international playing field for our institutions relative to their international competitors.’ Level playing fields are a worthy goal, but this is not a relevant argument. Instead, this tired bromide must be resoundingly dismissed on several counts: (and their enumeration)&#8230;&#8221; should be, plenty, galvanizing for those wishing to steel themselves against the welter of BS being bought by, and disseminated for, those &#8216;Financial Institutions&#8217; that should, in a more *Perfect World, be BK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

