<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230137</guid>
		<description>VD, 

take direction from sandy_lafave@wvmccd.cc.ca.us :

I&#039;d like you to read this famous story and think about whether Nietzsche wasn&#039;t on to something when he criticized the naive idea of human equality.

Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut (1961)
http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html
http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&amp;v%3Asources=webplus&amp;query=%22Harrison+Bergeron%22+by+Kurt+Vonnegut%2C+Jr

something tells me that you won&#039;t be *happy until a &quot;Ms. Glampers&quot; is, in fact, a sitting &quot;Handicapper General&quot;..you know, to make &#039;things *fair&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VD, </p>
<p>take direction from <a href="mailto:sandy_lafave@wvmccd.cc.ca.us">sandy_lafave@wvmccd.cc.ca.us</a> :</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like you to read this famous story and think about whether Nietzsche wasn&#8217;t on to something when he criticized the naive idea of human equality.</p>
<p>Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut (1961)<br />
<a href="http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html" rel="nofollow">http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html</a><br />
<a href="http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&#038;v%3Asources=webplus&#038;query=%22Harrison+Bergeron%22+by+Kurt+Vonnegut%2C+Jr" rel="nofollow">http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&#038;v%3Asources=webplus&#038;query=%22Harrison+Bergeron%22+by+Kurt+Vonnegut%2C+Jr</a></p>
<p>something tells me that you won&#8217;t be *happy until a &#8220;Ms. Glampers&#8221; is, in fact, a sitting &#8220;Handicapper General&#8221;..you know, to make &#8216;things *fair&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VennData</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230130</link>
		<dc:creator>VennData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230130</guid>
		<description>Jeremy Grantham&#039;s ability to indict the morals of Bush years without ever mentioning the man and his administration once, is uncanny.   

His hackneyed re-visit of the late-night comedy gags:  that Norwegians, relieved of the specter of the the worst US President in history, felt they had to send a message.    But the hundreds of millions of people who get up and go to work everyday disprove his point that it&#039;s all Easy Street out there.

Jeremy Granthan would rather the gov&#039;t let all the people who followed the Bush year&#039;s advice to get whatever punishment comes, whether it&#039;s too much or not.   Grantham doesn&#039;t care.  But Obama and his people do care, and if you only want to help people like me who didn&#039;t go hog wild but have benefited from having cash at the end of &#039;08, you&#039;re missing the point of life.  We need to fix the system and help the people who suffered.  Got it Grantham?  Sticking the skewer in further gets what?  Your sour little article?  Congratulations.  You&#039;re a curmudgeon.  How cute.

Easy to say when you&#039;re rich, old man.   Oh and what&#039;s your alpha? Negative?  Just your value add to the debate.  Punishment is what he wants.  And deflection of support from the ones who are going to raise his taxes a little.  

Screw you Grantham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy Grantham&#8217;s ability to indict the morals of Bush years without ever mentioning the man and his administration once, is uncanny.   </p>
<p>His hackneyed re-visit of the late-night comedy gags:  that Norwegians, relieved of the specter of the the worst US President in history, felt they had to send a message.    But the hundreds of millions of people who get up and go to work everyday disprove his point that it&#8217;s all Easy Street out there.</p>
<p>Jeremy Granthan would rather the gov&#8217;t let all the people who followed the Bush year&#8217;s advice to get whatever punishment comes, whether it&#8217;s too much or not.   Grantham doesn&#8217;t care.  But Obama and his people do care, and if you only want to help people like me who didn&#8217;t go hog wild but have benefited from having cash at the end of &#8217;08, you&#8217;re missing the point of life.  We need to fix the system and help the people who suffered.  Got it Grantham?  Sticking the skewer in further gets what?  Your sour little article?  Congratulations.  You&#8217;re a curmudgeon.  How cute.</p>
<p>Easy to say when you&#8217;re rich, old man.   Oh and what&#8217;s your alpha? Negative?  Just your value add to the debate.  Punishment is what he wants.  And deflection of support from the ones who are going to raise his taxes a little.  </p>
<p>Screw you Grantham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230116</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230116</guid>
		<description>State Department Official in Afghanistan Resigns Over U.S. Strategy 
October 27th, 2009 
Via: ABC News:
A key U.S. official in Afghanistan has resigned in protest over U.S. policy in the war-torn region, as the Obama administration deliberates its future strategy there.

Matthew Hoh, 36, a senior foreign service officer, wrote a four-page letter to Ambassador Nancy Powell, director general of the foreign service at the State Department, to express his “doubts and reservations about our current strategy and planned future strategy,” as first reported by the Washington Post today.

“To put simply, I fail to see the value or the worth in the continued U.S. casualties or expenditures of resources in support of the Afghan government in what is, truly, a 35-year-old civil war,” the former Marine wrote in the emotional letter.
Hoh spent six years in Iraq, where he served as a Marine Corps captain and then as a civilian for the Department of Defense.

Hoh told the Washington Post he decided to speak out publicly because “I want people in Iowa, people in Arkansas, people in Arizona, to call their congressman and say, ‘Listen, I don’t think this is right.’”  

The U.S. ambassador in Afghanistan, Karl W. Eikenberry, and Richard Holbrooke, the special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, apparently tried to talk Hoh out of resigning. The latter even offered him a job but Hoh declined, according to the Post...
http://cryptogon.com/?p=11889
a good reminder that if We want &#039;Change&#039; it&#039;ll, only, come from our doing..
~~
This item: 

Toxic Sludge is Good For You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry by John Stauber 

Trust Us We&#039;re Experts: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future by Sheldon Rampton  

Propaganda by Edward Bernays 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1567510604/ref=nosim/cryptogoncom-20
a good reminder that those that are lying to us, have had long-practice/are well-trained..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Department Official in Afghanistan Resigns Over U.S. Strategy<br />
October 27th, 2009<br />
Via: ABC News:<br />
A key U.S. official in Afghanistan has resigned in protest over U.S. policy in the war-torn region, as the Obama administration deliberates its future strategy there.</p>
<p>Matthew Hoh, 36, a senior foreign service officer, wrote a four-page letter to Ambassador Nancy Powell, director general of the foreign service at the State Department, to express his “doubts and reservations about our current strategy and planned future strategy,” as first reported by the Washington Post today.</p>
<p>“To put simply, I fail to see the value or the worth in the continued U.S. casualties or expenditures of resources in support of the Afghan government in what is, truly, a 35-year-old civil war,” the former Marine wrote in the emotional letter.<br />
Hoh spent six years in Iraq, where he served as a Marine Corps captain and then as a civilian for the Department of Defense.</p>
<p>Hoh told the Washington Post he decided to speak out publicly because “I want people in Iowa, people in Arkansas, people in Arizona, to call their congressman and say, ‘Listen, I don’t think this is right.’”  </p>
<p>The U.S. ambassador in Afghanistan, Karl W. Eikenberry, and Richard Holbrooke, the special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, apparently tried to talk Hoh out of resigning. The latter even offered him a job but Hoh declined, according to the Post&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://cryptogon.com/?p=11889" rel="nofollow">http://cryptogon.com/?p=11889</a><br />
a good reminder that if We want &#8216;Change&#8217; it&#8217;ll, only, come from our doing..<br />
~~<br />
This item: </p>
<p>Toxic Sludge is Good For You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry by John Stauber </p>
<p>Trust Us We&#8217;re Experts: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future by Sheldon Rampton  </p>
<p>Propaganda by Edward Bernays<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1567510604/ref=nosim/cryptogoncom-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1567510604/ref=nosim/cryptogoncom-20</a><br />
a good reminder that those that are lying to us, have had long-practice/are well-trained..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bman</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230107</link>
		<dc:creator>bman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230107</guid>
		<description>@DL, Don&#039;t know about horse dudu, but that is one change that I have noticed with this administration.
They seem to be putting some law enforcement people to work and starting to enforce some laws that were previously ignored.  Think of it this way, if you can&#039;t control or tax the greedy people,  because that will make you look socialist, because this is america,  and you still have to run for re-election, well you might as well just bust them.    I prefer the tax their greed until it helps the common weil, but you can always just jail the most blatant ones, and that helps to keep everyone else in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DL, Don&#8217;t know about horse dudu, but that is one change that I have noticed with this administration.<br />
They seem to be putting some law enforcement people to work and starting to enforce some laws that were previously ignored.  Think of it this way, if you can&#8217;t control or tax the greedy people,  because that will make you look socialist, because this is america,  and you still have to run for re-election, well you might as well just bust them.    I prefer the tax their greed until it helps the common weil, but you can always just jail the most blatant ones, and that helps to keep everyone else in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230104</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230104</guid>
		<description>Not to diss the hard work of MD&#039;s, but in this economy, everyone but bankers are taking a hit in income. Expect the same. There&#039;s just not enough money for things to continue as before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to diss the hard work of MD&#8217;s, but in this economy, everyone but bankers are taking a hit in income. Expect the same. There&#8217;s just not enough money for things to continue as before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230100</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230100</guid>
		<description>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/10/pitchfork-watch-couple-charged-with-torturing-suspected-mortgage-fraudsters.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/10/pitchfork-watch-couple-charged-with-torturing-suspected-mortgage-fraudsters.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/10/pitchfork-watch-couple-charged-with-torturing-suspected-mortgage-fraudsters.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230095</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230095</guid>
		<description>Bnt
So we might as well close the health industry because we can afford we have today, and we won&#039;t change it. no change ends up with .
the worst of all possible scenarios, no doctors, no hospitals, and no insurance.
and really really high mortality rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bnt<br />
So we might as well close the health industry because we can afford we have today, and we won&#8217;t change it. no change ends up with .<br />
the worst of all possible scenarios, no doctors, no hospitals, and no insurance.<br />
and really really high mortality rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230092</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230092</guid>
		<description>willid3:

You may have a health benefit and not nearly enough doctors.  Or hospitals.  Pass the law, and try to do it on the cheap...should be fun to watch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>willid3:</p>
<p>You may have a health benefit and not nearly enough doctors.  Or hospitals.  Pass the law, and try to do it on the cheap&#8230;should be fun to watch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230088</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230088</guid>
		<description>a new way to calculate executive pay?
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,657462,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a new way to calculate executive pay?<br />
<a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,657462,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,657462,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdmiralDmoney</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/tuesday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-230084</link>
		<dc:creator>AdmiralDmoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=42386#comment-230084</guid>
		<description>Gotta love the Hoffman Brothers. Atleast they didn&#039;t stoop to Cramer&#039;s low declining levels:

Sorry, Cramer … We Will Not Bow Down: 

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/breaking-news/sorry-cramer-we-will-not-bow-down/?p=3046/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love the Hoffman Brothers. Atleast they didn&#8217;t stoop to Cramer&#8217;s low declining levels:</p>
<p>Sorry, Cramer … We Will Not Bow Down: </p>
<p><a href="http://wallstcheatsheet.com/breaking-news/sorry-cramer-we-will-not-bow-down/?p=3046/" rel="nofollow">http://wallstcheatsheet.com/breaking-news/sorry-cramer-we-will-not-bow-down/?p=3046/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

