<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Birth Death Model Outpaced By Business Failures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transor Z</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236363</link>
		<dc:creator>Transor Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236363</guid>
		<description>The corporate dissolution data I&#039;ve seen suggests that dissolutions have been on the rise for 10 years but state data is also suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corporate dissolution data I&#8217;ve seen suggests that dissolutions have been on the rise for 10 years but state data is also suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: investorinpa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236300</link>
		<dc:creator>investorinpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236300</guid>
		<description>Barry &amp; others...

Do you think this is the reason why unemployment typically peaks after a recession is over?  Bad data gathering means that the number of unemployed bumps up well after a recovery or stopping of a recession?  It would seem to make sense that by the time the gubmint gets it right, the rally has started, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry &amp; others&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you think this is the reason why unemployment typically peaks after a recession is over?  Bad data gathering means that the number of unemployed bumps up well after a recovery or stopping of a recession?  It would seem to make sense that by the time the gubmint gets it right, the rally has started, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236283</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236283</guid>
		<description>Business leaders extensively collect and sift “data” {..no matter how flawed} because they assume they can use it to manage their firms to better outcomes — but they can never even begin to accurately collect the required economic data… and have no chance of productively using whatever they do collect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business leaders extensively collect and sift “data” {..no matter how flawed} because they assume they can use it to manage their firms to better outcomes — but they can never even begin to accurately collect the required economic data… and have no chance of productively using whatever they do collect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcmalley</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236276</link>
		<dc:creator>mcmalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236276</guid>
		<description>... the collection and analysis of &quot;current&quot; national economic statistics has always been seriously flawed.  But it can be no other way. It is impossible to do in a dynamic, complex economy-- much less rationally act on such data by Federal government agencies.

Such knowledge in a social system of exchange &amp; production is vastly dispersed among divergent, socially distant individuals. The bedrock economic principle of &#039;division of labor&#039; in a large nation &#039;requires&#039; a complex diffusion of economic knowledge, in a state of constant flux.  The only proven means available for efficiently using this dispersed knowledge is a private market economy. 

Federal central economic planners extensively collect and sift &quot;data&quot; {..no matter how flawed} because they assume they can use it to manipulate the national economy to better outcomes -- but they can never even begin to accurately collect the required economic data... and have no chance of productively using whatever they do collect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; the collection and analysis of &#8220;current&#8221; national economic statistics has always been seriously flawed.  But it can be no other way. It is impossible to do in a dynamic, complex economy&#8211; much less rationally act on such data by Federal government agencies.</p>
<p>Such knowledge in a social system of exchange &amp; production is vastly dispersed among divergent, socially distant individuals. The bedrock economic principle of &#8216;division of labor&#8217; in a large nation &#8216;requires&#8217; a complex diffusion of economic knowledge, in a state of constant flux.  The only proven means available for efficiently using this dispersed knowledge is a private market economy. </p>
<p>Federal central economic planners extensively collect and sift &#8220;data&#8221; {..no matter how flawed} because they assume they can use it to manipulate the national economy to better outcomes &#8212; but they can never even begin to accurately collect the required economic data&#8230; and have no chance of productively using whatever they do collect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easystreet</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236274</link>
		<dc:creator>easystreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236274</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally shocked that the gooberment can&#039;t get their shi* together.  I wonder how much other data need revised.  Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally shocked that the gooberment can&#8217;t get their shi* together.  I wonder how much other data need revised.  Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hue</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236266</link>
		<dc:creator>hue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236266</guid>
		<description>if people are unemployed and not captured in gov&#039;t statistics, then are they really unemployed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if people are unemployed and not captured in gov&#8217;t statistics, then are they really unemployed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davossherman@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236259</link>
		<dc:creator>davossherman@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236259</guid>
		<description>Amazing, one guy (John Williams of Shadow Statistics) can run a small company that can put out an accurate unemployment number and our entire government can&#039;t. John even corrects CPI and the rest of the morose. 

If our government made instruments for airplanes the NTSB would be the biggest branch of the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, one guy (John Williams of Shadow Statistics) can run a small company that can put out an accurate unemployment number and our entire government can&#8217;t. John even corrects CPI and the rest of the morose. </p>
<p>If our government made instruments for airplanes the NTSB would be the biggest branch of the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston Munn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236222</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236222</guid>
		<description>The Birth/Death model sounds like a throwback to the Vietnam days and the Defense Department&#039;s use of the body count as a sign of progress in the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Birth/Death model sounds like a throwback to the Vietnam days and the Defense Department&#8217;s use of the body count as a sign of progress in the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TulsaTime</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/birth-death-model-fails-to-keep-up-with-business-failures/comment-page-1/#comment-236221</link>
		<dc:creator>TulsaTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44257#comment-236221</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s one reason the survey data can be useful, but we know they don&#039;t want to report that big ass number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s one reason the survey data can be useful, but we know they don&#8217;t want to report that big ass number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

