Comments on: China Exports by State http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/ Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:55:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Trainwreck http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234213 Trainwreck Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:18:49 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234213 India's trade with us is more more balanced, and much less as a total compared to China. Exports to India though Aug 2009: $10,831,500,000 Imports from India though Aug 2009: $13,599,100,000 Trade imbalance: -$2,767,700,000 Of course the labor outsourcing picture is much more complex considering not all outsourcing would show up in the trade data. India’s trade with us is more more balanced, and much less as a total compared to China.

Exports to India though Aug 2009: $10,831,500,000
Imports from India though Aug 2009: $13,599,100,000
Trade imbalance: -$2,767,700,000

Of course the labor outsourcing picture is much more complex considering not all outsourcing would show up in the trade data.

]]> By: Mannwich http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234204 Mannwich Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:00:49 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234204 This is what our elite masters tell us is "free trade" - free for the Sheeple get its asses kicked with no protections for us, while our trading partners protect its interests like the U.S. should be doing, but our masters are too busy throwing everyone under the bus so they can count their winnings. Bunch of traitorous welfare queens. This is what our elite masters tell us is “free trade” – free for the Sheeple get its asses kicked with no protections for us, while our trading partners protect its interests like the U.S. should be doing, but our masters are too busy throwing everyone under the bus so they can count their winnings. Bunch of traitorous welfare queens.

]]> By: franklin420d http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234203 franklin420d Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:00:23 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234203 Whoa little bro, you are getting some serious aclinaids today - You keep this up and mom will seat you at the head of the table on Turkey day. Whoa little bro, you are getting some serious aclinaids today – You keep this up and mom will seat you at the head of the table on Turkey day.

]]> By: Mark E Hoffer http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234202 Mark E Hoffer Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:59:55 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234202 Stillaway, you ask: "Why do we trade with a communist country that has nuclear missiles pointed at us?" --The systematic, intentional extermination of the Middle Class has been going on at least since Nixon went to China... http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&v%3Asources=webplus&query=China+MFN+War+on+the+Middle+Class http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&v%3Asources=webplus&query=War+on+the+Middle+Class funny that Nixon goes to China in'72, and these guys http://www.trilateral.org/about.htm come public in '73 "...The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.” That interdependence also has ensured that the current financial crisis has been felt in every nation and region. It has fundamentally shaken confidence in the international system as a whole. The Commission sees in these unprecedented events a stronger need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) have been the primary anchors of the wider international system. Doubts about whether and how this primacy will change do not diminish, and, if anything, have intensified the need to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system..." Stillaway,

you ask:

“Why do we trade with a communist country that has nuclear missiles pointed at us?”

–The systematic, intentional extermination of the Middle Class has been going on at least since Nixon went to China…
http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&v%3Asources=webplus&query=China+MFN+War+on+the+Middle+Class
http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&v%3Asources=webplus&query=War+on+the+Middle+Class

funny that Nixon goes to China in’72, and these guys http://www.trilateral.org/about.htm come public in ’73
“…The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.” That interdependence also has ensured that the current financial crisis has been felt in every nation and region. It has fundamentally shaken confidence in the international system as a whole. The Commission sees in these unprecedented events a stronger need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) have been the primary anchors of the wider international system. Doubts about whether and how this primacy will change do not diminish, and, if anything, have intensified the need to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system…”

]]> By: alfred e http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234199 alfred e Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:49:27 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234199 What I noticed is there's no entry for India. Nada. What, Bananamerican corporations off-shore jobs to India like crazy and India imports zip from us. Figures. What I noticed is there’s no entry for India. Nada.

What, Bananamerican corporations off-shore jobs to India like crazy and India imports zip from us.

Figures.

]]> By: patfla http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234195 patfla Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:36:41 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234195 I'm not disputing the numbers, but first I'd like to know who the 'US/China Business Council' is. If I get the time, I'll look them up. Always look at where you data comes from. I’m not disputing the numbers, but first I’d like to know who the ‘US/China Business Council’ is. If I get the time, I’ll look them up.

Always look at where you data comes from.

]]> By: Pat G. http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234194 Pat G. Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:32:03 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234194 Looks logical, port cities than by rail or truck to the inner-main cities. Is that a big bald spot in the middle of the U.S. or what? Mrs says it could be a fuzzy picture of the back of my head. lol Looks logical, port cities than by rail or truck to the inner-main cities. Is that a big bald spot in the middle of the U.S. or what? Mrs says it could be a fuzzy picture of the back of my head. lol

]]> By: Stillaway http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234193 Stillaway Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:30:44 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234193 It's good to see trade with China is a two way street. 19 lanes coming in and 1 lane out. And the one lane out is dedicated to technology they wish to acquire (steal). Why do we trade with a communist country that has nuclear missiles pointed at us? If corporations need cheap labor then it at least should come from a country that has some semblance of a democracy. If we had permitted open trade with the Soviet Union the Berlin Wall would still be standing. It’s good to see trade with China is a two way street.
19 lanes coming in and 1 lane out.
And the one lane out is dedicated to technology they wish to acquire (steal).

Why do we trade with a communist country that has nuclear missiles pointed at us?
If corporations need cheap labor then it at least should come from a country that has some semblance of a democracy.

If we had permitted open trade with the Soviet Union the Berlin Wall would still be standing.

]]> By: MRegan http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234191 MRegan Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:24:35 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234191 'a clue' ‘a clue’

]]> By: MRegan http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/china-exports-by-state/comment-page-1/#comment-234190 MRegan Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:24:10 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43543#comment-234190 MEH- Yup. However, perhaps we are entering a reaping period and capital outflows will exert pressure on financial assets related to Brazil. I guess an clue I missed was operations like JBS buying real assets here in the states. 2010 may prove to be confounding wrt Brazil. Mr. Ritholtz, muito tarde, issa a-bunda-nza [sic] facil alongou-se como uma garota alegre MEH-

Yup. However, perhaps we are entering a reaping period and capital outflows will exert pressure on financial assets related to Brazil. I guess an clue I missed was operations like JBS buying real assets here in the states. 2010 may prove to be confounding wrt Brazil.

Mr. Ritholtz, muito tarde, issa a-bunda-nza [sic] facil alongou-se como uma garota alegre

]]>