<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consolidated NYSE volume on track for another sub 5b share day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/consolidated-nyse-volume-on-track-for-another-sub-5b-share-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/consolidated-nyse-volume-on-track-for-another-sub-5b-share-day/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:24:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: robrix</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/consolidated-nyse-volume-on-track-for-another-sub-5b-share-day/comment-page-1/#comment-233670</link>
		<dc:creator>robrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/consolidated-nyse-volume-on-track-for-another-sub-5b-share-day/#comment-233670</guid>
		<description>Has anybody seen any commentary or analysis linking the drop offs in volumes to the growing use of  &#039;dark pools&#039; or other unreported trading mechanisms?   Can we have any confidence in reported volume any more?  

Thanks in advance to anyone who can point me in the right direction on this.   
-robrix</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody seen any commentary or analysis linking the drop offs in volumes to the growing use of  &#8216;dark pools&#8217; or other unreported trading mechanisms?   Can we have any confidence in reported volume any more?  </p>
<p>Thanks in advance to anyone who can point me in the right direction on this.<br />
-robrix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
