<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Declines and State Tax Revenues (1964- 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:06:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FM newswire, 12 November &#8211; links to old-fashioned journalism &#171; Fabius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-234037</link>
		<dc:creator>FM newswire, 12 November &#8211; links to old-fashioned journalism &#171; Fabius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-234037</guid>
		<description>[...] (a)  &#8220;State Tax Revenues Show Record Drop, For Second Consecutive Quarter&#8220;, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, October 2009 &#8212; &#8220;Fiscal 2009 Also Brought Record Overall Decline of 8.2% , or $63 Billion.&#8221;  See the key graphs here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (a)  &#8220;State Tax Revenues Show Record Drop, For Second Consecutive Quarter&#8220;, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, October 2009 &#8212; &#8220;Fiscal 2009 Also Brought Record Overall Decline of 8.2% , or $63 Billion.&#8221;  See the key graphs here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston Munn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233674</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233674</guid>
		<description>Remain calm. All is well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remain calm. All is well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233668</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233668</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what they refer to as &quot;trickle down economics&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what they refer to as &#8220;trickle down economics&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233647</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233647</guid>
		<description>&quot;our masters found a way to blow a boubble in the residential housing marked. Some of the fantasy gains in home values were then cashed out by the sheeple for consumption, and that held the GDP values up.&quot;

exactly what happened</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;our masters found a way to blow a boubble in the residential housing marked. Some of the fantasy gains in home values were then cashed out by the sheeple for consumption, and that held the GDP values up.&#8221;</p>
<p>exactly what happened</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233644</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233644</guid>
		<description>Willid3; I agree, the 2001 recession was never over.  It’s just that our masters found a way to blow a boubble in the residential housing marked.  Some of the fantasy gains in home values were then cashed out by the sheeple for consumption, and that held the GDP values up.  That worked long enough that our masters could have their little lapdog elected for a second presidential term.  Just enough time to rob the country one last time before it all fell apart.  The beauty of it is that the mess left behing is so bad that the new guy will not be able to fix it fast enough to avoid blame (for not fixing it).  So at the next election our masters can again get one of their little braindead lapdog elected and reapeat their rape of this country – ya bet ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willid3; I agree, the 2001 recession was never over.  It’s just that our masters found a way to blow a boubble in the residential housing marked.  Some of the fantasy gains in home values were then cashed out by the sheeple for consumption, and that held the GDP values up.  That worked long enough that our masters could have their little lapdog elected for a second presidential term.  Just enough time to rob the country one last time before it all fell apart.  The beauty of it is that the mess left behing is so bad that the new guy will not be able to fix it fast enough to avoid blame (for not fixing it).  So at the next election our masters can again get one of their little braindead lapdog elected and reapeat their rape of this country – ya bet ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lugnut</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233640</link>
		<dc:creator>Lugnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233640</guid>
		<description>At least our new Governor (Christie) in NJ doesn&#039;t appear have any preconceptions about the state of our budget/tax situation

&quot;N.J. Gov.-elect Chris Christie considers declaring financial state of emergency
By Star-Ledger Staff 
November 09, 2009, 7:34PM
As he seeks concessions from state workers to balance his first budget, Gov.-elect Chris Christie is examining the possibility of declaring a financial emergency in the state, according to an official familiar with his plans.

Such a declaration — invoking the same law as if New Jersey were hit by a natural disaster — could give Christie broad powers, such as suspending rules governing state worker layoffs. With many state workers due to receive two raises in the next fiscal year and a no-layoff pledge in place through December 2010, Christie’s transition team expects to tackle the issue before he takes office Jan. 19, two of his advisers said today.&quot;


All hands on deck. This ought to make a few (shorter tenured) state employees a little nervous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least our new Governor (Christie) in NJ doesn&#8217;t appear have any preconceptions about the state of our budget/tax situation</p>
<p>&#8220;N.J. Gov.-elect Chris Christie considers declaring financial state of emergency<br />
By Star-Ledger Staff<br />
November 09, 2009, 7:34PM<br />
As he seeks concessions from state workers to balance his first budget, Gov.-elect Chris Christie is examining the possibility of declaring a financial emergency in the state, according to an official familiar with his plans.</p>
<p>Such a declaration — invoking the same law as if New Jersey were hit by a natural disaster — could give Christie broad powers, such as suspending rules governing state worker layoffs. With many state workers due to receive two raises in the next fiscal year and a no-layoff pledge in place through December 2010, Christie’s transition team expects to tackle the issue before he takes office Jan. 19, two of his advisers said today.&#8221;</p>
<p>All hands on deck. This ought to make a few (shorter tenured) state employees a little nervous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233637</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233637</guid>
		<description>http://www.foreclosuredataonline.com/blog/foreclosure/more-california-hotels-fall-foreclosure/

More California Hotels Fall into Foreclosure

&quot;The amount of hotels in California that have been involved in actions of foreclosure or default has risen incredibly by 125% within just the past sixty days.

So far, 31 hotels have already been foreclosed and 175 properties of hotels are currently in default. Properties that have already been lost to foreclosure can mostly been found in the counties of Riverside, San Diego and San Bernardino.&quot;

...I noticed Jane Wells on CNBC stating today that this was an absolutely marvelous time to see the USA...I wonder if anyone suggested to her to use that storyline today..

..Yes, I am skeptical...of much of what I see lately.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foreclosuredataonline.com/blog/foreclosure/more-california-hotels-fall-foreclosure/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foreclosuredataonline.com/blog/foreclosure/more-california-hotels-fall-foreclosure/</a></p>
<p>More California Hotels Fall into Foreclosure</p>
<p>&#8220;The amount of hotels in California that have been involved in actions of foreclosure or default has risen incredibly by 125% within just the past sixty days.</p>
<p>So far, 31 hotels have already been foreclosed and 175 properties of hotels are currently in default. Properties that have already been lost to foreclosure can mostly been found in the counties of Riverside, San Diego and San Bernardino.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;I noticed Jane Wells on CNBC stating today that this was an absolutely marvelous time to see the USA&#8230;I wonder if anyone suggested to her to use that storyline today..</p>
<p>..Yes, I am skeptical&#8230;of much of what I see lately&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233636</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233636</guid>
		<description>states are broke
http://econompicdata.blogspot.com/2009/11/state-of-states-theyre-broke.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>states are broke<br />
<a href="http://econompicdata.blogspot.com/2009/11/state-of-states-theyre-broke.html" rel="nofollow">http://econompicdata.blogspot.com/2009/11/state-of-states-theyre-broke.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233631</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233631</guid>
		<description>hcf, debt has driven the economy for almost 100 years now. our problem was that incomes weren&#039;t increasing and wall street figured out how to make money on bad loans, replacing the incomes that didn&#039;t increase. had they not figured out that and gamed it so that incomes would keep collapsing, the 2001 recession would never have been over, in a way i don&#039;t think it ever was. we just had a credit band-aid on it.  but without you have a very small economy, and we have lots of people, and they all need jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hcf, debt has driven the economy for almost 100 years now. our problem was that incomes weren&#8217;t increasing and wall street figured out how to make money on bad loans, replacing the incomes that didn&#8217;t increase. had they not figured out that and gamed it so that incomes would keep collapsing, the 2001 recession would never have been over, in a way i don&#8217;t think it ever was. we just had a credit band-aid on it.  but without you have a very small economy, and we have lots of people, and they all need jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/economy-state-tax-revenues-1964-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-233630</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=43417#comment-233630</guid>
		<description>ashpelham2, nothing really new about sports there. even in the depth of the GD, that &#039;party&#039; never stopped. it may have had some cut backs (probably like now). but it didn&#039;t stop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ashpelham2, nothing really new about sports there. even in the depth of the GD, that &#8216;party&#8217; never stopped. it may have had some cut backs (probably like now). but it didn&#8217;t stop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

