<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S&amp;P500 Performance Peak-to-Trough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert M</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/comment-page-1/#comment-236729</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44403#comment-236729</guid>
		<description>The decline is 909.3 points. a 2/3rds retracement is 600.14 points. With the low at 666.69 you should be at 1266.93. How do you explain this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decline is 909.3 points. a 2/3rds retracement is 600.14 points. With the low at 666.69 you should be at 1266.93. How do you explain this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/comment-page-1/#comment-236697</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44403#comment-236697</guid>
		<description>And note for the numerically illiterate, many of whom have on-air jobs on financial shows, that a 58% drop followed by a 67% gain doesn&#039;t get you back to even.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And note for the numerically illiterate, many of whom have on-air jobs on financial shows, that a 58% drop followed by a 67% gain doesn&#8217;t get you back to even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/comment-page-1/#comment-236626</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44403#comment-236626</guid>
		<description>What about this bubble Ben?  What bubble?

Have any idea of how this one is being created?  Nope.

Could there be a correlation between it and your printing press, balance sheet and/or ZIRP?  Nope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about this bubble Ben?  What bubble?</p>
<p>Have any idea of how this one is being created?  Nope.</p>
<p>Could there be a correlation between it and your printing press, balance sheet and/or ZIRP?  Nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashpelham2</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/comment-page-1/#comment-236610</link>
		<dc:creator>ashpelham2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44403#comment-236610</guid>
		<description>Man, this thing has all the makings of another equity bubble.  Clearly, at the ripe old age of 34, I don&#039;t have the capacity of risk that I think I do....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this thing has all the makings of another equity bubble.  Clearly, at the ripe old age of 34, I don&#8217;t have the capacity of risk that I think I do&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott F</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/comment-page-1/#comment-236596</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44403#comment-236596</guid>
		<description>Buy Buy Buy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy Buy Buy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/comment-page-1/#comment-236575</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44403#comment-236575</guid>
		<description>AWESOME-  great news-

GS making thiers- means all is right w/ America-

the Fed-  now there&#039;s some heroes- avoiding the next Great Depression- all clear sailing from here- victory!!!

anybody-  where can i find a Bernake poster- Hot Topic?  Wal-Mart?- probably all sold out i imagine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOME-  great news-</p>
<p>GS making thiers- means all is right w/ America-</p>
<p>the Fed-  now there&#8217;s some heroes- avoiding the next Great Depression- all clear sailing from here- victory!!!</p>
<p>anybody-  where can i find a Bernake poster- Hot Topic?  Wal-Mart?- probably all sold out i imagine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsneath</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/sp500-performance-peak-to-trough/comment-page-1/#comment-236571</link>
		<dc:creator>bsneath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44403#comment-236571</guid>
		<description>Looks like a perfect &quot;V&quot; shaped recovery!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a perfect &#8220;V&#8221; shaped recovery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

