<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Reads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonderman</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-236379</link>
		<dc:creator>bonderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-236379</guid>
		<description>Barry-
Isn&#039;t about time for a Sociopath of the Year contest?  I&#039; know Madoff is probable number 1 but maybe some TBP readers can jog our memories?  Perhaps break it into categories; Unconvicted SOY, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry-<br />
Isn&#8217;t about time for a Sociopath of the Year contest?  I&#8217; know Madoff is probable number 1 but maybe some TBP readers can jog our memories?  Perhaps break it into categories; Unconvicted SOY, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235582</link>
		<dc:creator>hr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235582</guid>
		<description>The article in Foreign Policy &quot;Take Me Back to Constantinople&quot; by Edward Luttwak doesn&#039;t even begin to tell the whole story.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire  (quickest source I could find):

&quot;None of his immediate successors had any particular military or political talent and the administration of the Empire increasingly fell into the hands of the civil service. Efforts to revive the Byzantine economy only resulted in inflation and a debased gold coinage. The army was now seen as both an unnecessary expense and a political threat. Therefore, native troops were cashiered and replaced by foreign mercenaries on specific contract.&quot;

I would suggest you look into this a little more. It is surprising the effect that gold and coinage and the economy, and their debasement, had on the decline of the Byzantine Empire.

Barry, since your blog is mainly about money, I&#039;m shocked you missed the connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article in Foreign Policy &#8220;Take Me Back to Constantinople&#8221; by Edward Luttwak doesn&#8217;t even begin to tell the whole story.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire</a>  (quickest source I could find):</p>
<p>&#8220;None of his immediate successors had any particular military or political talent and the administration of the Empire increasingly fell into the hands of the civil service. Efforts to revive the Byzantine economy only resulted in inflation and a debased gold coinage. The army was now seen as both an unnecessary expense and a political threat. Therefore, native troops were cashiered and replaced by foreign mercenaries on specific contract.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would suggest you look into this a little more. It is surprising the effect that gold and coinage and the economy, and their debasement, had on the decline of the Byzantine Empire.</p>
<p>Barry, since your blog is mainly about money, I&#8217;m shocked you missed the connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiseSnake</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235349</link>
		<dc:creator>WiseSnake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235349</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe Barry is linking to Mike Whitney at Counterpunch! I&#039;ve been reading this guy for a while and he has been spot on on a number of things. Like he sold his house in 2005 because of the bubble... Hard to beat. It&#039;s funny how the truth about the US economy tended to linger on non mainstream website. Whitney is the perfect example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe Barry is linking to Mike Whitney at Counterpunch! I&#8217;ve been reading this guy for a while and he has been spot on on a number of things. Like he sold his house in 2005 because of the bubble&#8230; Hard to beat. It&#8217;s funny how the truth about the US economy tended to linger on non mainstream website. Whitney is the perfect example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235327</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235327</guid>
		<description>willid-  nice little in that link-  quick blurb-

&quot;[Chinese] elite would much rather create export jobs, even at the cost of subsidizing foreign buyers, than allow the yuan to rise and thereby risk job shortages at home. &quot;

i see it as dumping their cheap goods on the rest of the world by keeping the yuan artificially low-

can&#039;t last forever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>willid-  nice little in that link-  quick blurb-</p>
<p>&#8220;[Chinese] elite would much rather create export jobs, even at the cost of subsidizing foreign buyers, than allow the yuan to rise and thereby risk job shortages at home. &#8221;</p>
<p>i see it as dumping their cheap goods on the rest of the world by keeping the yuan artificially low-</p>
<p>can&#8217;t last forever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235319</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235319</guid>
		<description>China and the American jobless machine?

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/11/china-and-the-american-jobs-machine.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China and the American jobless machine?</p>
<p><a href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/11/china-and-the-american-jobs-machine.html" rel="nofollow">http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/11/china-and-the-american-jobs-machine.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VennData</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235317</link>
		<dc:creator>VennData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235317</guid>
		<description>Using TARP to pay down some debt trial balloons...

&quot;...President Barack Obama plans to announce in next year&#039;s State of the Union address that he wants to focus extensively on cutting the federal deficit in 2010 – and will downplay other new domestic spending beyond jobs programs, according to top aides involved in the planning...&quot;

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29471.html 

&quot;...The administration wants to keep some of the unspent funds available for emergencies, but is considering setting aside a chunk for debt reduction, according to people familiar with the matter...&quot;

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125799009185344567.html?mod=igoogle_wsj_gadgv1

This is worth an email to support this idea.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using TARP to pay down some debt trial balloons&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;President Barack Obama plans to announce in next year&#8217;s State of the Union address that he wants to focus extensively on cutting the federal deficit in 2010 – and will downplay other new domestic spending beyond jobs programs, according to top aides involved in the planning&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29471.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29471.html</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;The administration wants to keep some of the unspent funds available for emergencies, but is considering setting aside a chunk for debt reduction, according to people familiar with the matter&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125799009185344567.html?mod=igoogle_wsj_gadgv1" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125799009185344567.html?mod=igoogle_wsj_gadgv1</a></p>
<p>This is worth an email to support this idea.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bergsten</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235310</link>
		<dc:creator>bergsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235310</guid>
		<description>&quot;About Half in US would Pay for Online News&quot; -- this article laments that this number is &lt;b&gt;low&lt;/b&gt; compared to other countries.

However, a month ago (Sept. 21st) we were told that &quot;Only 5% of Web Users Would Pay for News&quot;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/sep/21/paid-content-newspapers-online-news

So, what changed?

My guess is that somebody else paid to get a different answer.

If somebody surveyed &lt;b&gt;me&lt;/b&gt; I&#039;d say that I&#039;d pay for news but &lt;b&gt;I should be paid&lt;/b&gt; for the BS that passes for the &quot;news&quot; that I&#039;m getting now.    

Such as these survey results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;About Half in US would Pay for Online News&#8221; &#8212; this article laments that this number is <b>low</b> compared to other countries.</p>
<p>However, a month ago (Sept. 21st) we were told that &#8220;Only 5% of Web Users Would Pay for News&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/sep/21/paid-content-newspapers-online-news" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/sep/21/paid-content-newspapers-online-news</a></p>
<p>So, what changed?</p>
<p>My guess is that somebody else paid to get a different answer.</p>
<p>If somebody surveyed <b>me</b> I&#8217;d say that I&#8217;d pay for news but <b>I should be paid</b> for the BS that passes for the &#8220;news&#8221; that I&#8217;m getting now.    </p>
<p>Such as these survey results&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235286</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235286</guid>
		<description>as indicated in Market Talk article regarding &quot;Bubble Logic&quot;-  what can the Fed do???   They can&#039;t raise rates-  EVERY asset class is inflated based on FED/USG policy (ZIRP/QE/Tax Credits for homes, foreclosure moratoriums))-

the Fed is willing to risk $ destruction-  and high inflation- in fact- it may be their intention- with the hope of supporting asset prices-

my guess- the $ will catch a bid with or without them and the air will be let out of this commodity/equity before  long</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as indicated in Market Talk article regarding &#8220;Bubble Logic&#8221;-  what can the Fed do???   They can&#8217;t raise rates-  EVERY asset class is inflated based on FED/USG policy (ZIRP/QE/Tax Credits for homes, foreclosure moratoriums))-</p>
<p>the Fed is willing to risk $ destruction-  and high inflation- in fact- it may be their intention- with the hope of supporting asset prices-</p>
<p>my guess- the $ will catch a bid with or without them and the air will be let out of this commodity/equity before  long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beaufou</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235283</link>
		<dc:creator>beaufou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235283</guid>
		<description>In OT,

BR, while you&#039;re sitting on those long plane rides, check out Simple Minds new stuff, after running out of steam in the nineties, they have made three very good albums.
U2 fans are usually very pleasantly surprised.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AXCohT0jQM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In OT,</p>
<p>BR, while you&#8217;re sitting on those long plane rides, check out Simple Minds new stuff, after running out of steam in the nineties, they have made three very good albums.<br />
U2 fans are usually very pleasantly surprised.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AXCohT0jQM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AXCohT0jQM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/tuesday-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-235278</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44026#comment-235278</guid>
		<description>Their cake: http://thisiswhyyourefat.com/
Your cake: http://www.foodincmovie.com/
Taleb&#039;s cake: http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article4022091.ece
My cake (Taleb&#039;s too): http://www.arthurdevany.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their cake: <a href="http://thisiswhyyourefat.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thisiswhyyourefat.com/</a><br />
Your cake: <a href="http://www.foodincmovie.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foodincmovie.com/</a><br />
Taleb&#8217;s cake: <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article4022091.ece" rel="nofollow">http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article4022091.ece</a><br />
My cake (Taleb&#8217;s too): <a href="http://www.arthurdevany.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.arthurdevany.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

