<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elizabeth Warren on TARP Achievements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/elizabeth-warren-on-tarp-achievements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/elizabeth-warren-on-tarp-achievements/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dza</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/elizabeth-warren-on-tarp-achievements/comment-page-1/#comment-241004</link>
		<dc:creator>dza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45901#comment-241004</guid>
		<description>Well, they really don&#039;t have them by the balls; it&#039;s the other way around. And it&#039;s implied in their policy that the administration thinks economic health hinges on asset inflation, which is ultimately helped by bank trading. It&#039;s not cynical, it&#039;s an obvious fact of their business model, and to think otherwise is pretty ignorant. The idea that government and banking have mutually exclusive interests is a fairy tale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they really don&#8217;t have them by the balls; it&#8217;s the other way around. And it&#8217;s implied in their policy that the administration thinks economic health hinges on asset inflation, which is ultimately helped by bank trading. It&#8217;s not cynical, it&#8217;s an obvious fact of their business model, and to think otherwise is pretty ignorant. The idea that government and banking have mutually exclusive interests is a fairy tale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTB</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/elizabeth-warren-on-tarp-achievements/comment-page-1/#comment-240998</link>
		<dc:creator>CTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45901#comment-240998</guid>
		<description>The conspiracy theorist in me wonders whether the government is tolerating the unfair advantage built into the TBTF banks trading, since the government already has them by the balls.  

The government may be relying on this unfair advantage to &quot;clear the field&quot; of speculators before clamping down with financial regulation.  Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conspiracy theorist in me wonders whether the government is tolerating the unfair advantage built into the TBTF banks trading, since the government already has them by the balls.  </p>
<p>The government may be relying on this unfair advantage to &#8220;clear the field&#8221; of speculators before clamping down with financial regulation.  Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave J</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/elizabeth-warren-on-tarp-achievements/comment-page-1/#comment-240885</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45901#comment-240885</guid>
		<description>Joe K&#039;s typical vacuous CNBC commentary.  Any criticism of Wall Street is labelled &quot;cynical&quot; and belongs on an opinion show on some other network.  As if CNBC was not an opinion show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe K&#8217;s typical vacuous CNBC commentary.  Any criticism of Wall Street is labelled &#8220;cynical&#8221; and belongs on an opinion show on some other network.  As if CNBC was not an opinion show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

