<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fed&#8217;s Flow of Funds Highlights (and Lowlights)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cewing</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241228</link>
		<dc:creator>cewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241228</guid>
		<description>window washer:

I&#039;d respond to your post, but you sound like a complete douche, and I don&#039;t want to wreck a perfectly nice blog thread getting into a pissing contest. If you want to discuss it further - cewing@mindspring.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>window washer:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d respond to your post, but you sound like a complete douche, and I don&#8217;t want to wreck a perfectly nice blog thread getting into a pissing contest. If you want to discuss it further &#8211; <a href="mailto:cewing@mindspring.com">cewing@mindspring.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invictus</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241126</link>
		<dc:creator>Invictus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241126</guid>
		<description>@Wally -- Owners&#039; Equity did not go down in the quarter, it went up.  In Q2 it was 35.8%, and in Q3 it was 37.6%.  It troughed (or so we can hope) in Q1 at 33.5%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wally &#8212; Owners&#8217; Equity did not go down in the quarter, it went up.  In Q2 it was 35.8%, and in Q3 it was 37.6%.  It troughed (or so we can hope) in Q1 at 33.5%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wally</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241119</link>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241119</guid>
		<description>Owner equity in homes went down but net household worth went up? Does that seem to be believable?

The only way that could happen is if the class income disparity has also increased - those who own an interest in the fake stock rally are a mighty small percent of households. Nothing else has increased for the rabble.... but they did abandon a lot of debt. Does that come out as a positive in the household net worth charts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owner equity in homes went down but net household worth went up? Does that seem to be believable?</p>
<p>The only way that could happen is if the class income disparity has also increased &#8211; those who own an interest in the fake stock rally are a mighty small percent of households. Nothing else has increased for the rabble&#8230;. but they did abandon a lot of debt. Does that come out as a positive in the household net worth charts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The sideways march continues - Steve Cook on Disciplined Investing - InvestorsInsight.com &#124; Financial Intelligence, Advice &#38; Research / Investment Strategies &#38; Planning for Individual Investors.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241079</link>
		<dc:creator>The sideways march continues - Steve Cook on Disciplined Investing - InvestorsInsight.com &#124; Financial Intelligence, Advice &#38; Research / Investment Strategies &#38; Planning for Individual Investors.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241079</guid>
		<description>[...] The latest look at the household balance sheet (short):&#160;&#160;&#160; http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/&#160;&#160;&#160; But before getting jiggy, check this out (medium):&#160;&#160;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The latest look at the household balance sheet (short):&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/&nbsp;&nbsp;&#038;nbsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/&nbsp;&nbsp;&#038;nbsp</a>; But before getting jiggy, check this out (medium):&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. home equity is less than you think &#8211; FiftyThousandFootView</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241078</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. home equity is less than you think &#8211; FiftyThousandFootView</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241078</guid>
		<description>[...] Ritholtz, at his Big Picture blog, makes the following observation:  &#8220;The chart above ties in beautifully with a WSJ article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ritholtz, at his Big Picture blog, makes the following observation:  &#8220;The chart above ties in beautifully with a WSJ article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Window Washer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241053</link>
		<dc:creator>The Window Washer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241053</guid>
		<description>cewing,

&quot;A majority of the population owning a home made sense when most people had stable jobs and lived in one place for most of their lives. Considering the financial situation of many Americans today, especially young people, renting makes far more sense.&#039;


I have an idea, it&#039;s very old school.

Go to a calculator and figuire out what you can afford on a 15year fixed.
Use that number to go buy a house using a 30 year fixed.
Easy.

Before  you say something like &quot;A majority of the population owning a home made sense when most people had stable jobs and lived in one place for most of their lives.&quot; At least look at the household mobility numbers ec..... going back to the 40&#039;s. 

Statements like that make you look like a girl that just finished a liberal arts degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cewing,</p>
<p>&#8220;A majority of the population owning a home made sense when most people had stable jobs and lived in one place for most of their lives. Considering the financial situation of many Americans today, especially young people, renting makes far more sense.&#8217;</p>
<p>I have an idea, it&#8217;s very old school.</p>
<p>Go to a calculator and figuire out what you can afford on a 15year fixed.<br />
Use that number to go buy a house using a 30 year fixed.<br />
Easy.</p>
<p>Before  you say something like &#8220;A majority of the population owning a home made sense when most people had stable jobs and lived in one place for most of their lives.&#8221; At least look at the household mobility numbers ec&#8230;.. going back to the 40&#8242;s. </p>
<p>Statements like that make you look like a girl that just finished a liberal arts degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cewing</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241049</link>
		<dc:creator>cewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241049</guid>
		<description>Between mortgage payments, property taxes, repairs, maintenance, insurance, and fluctuating property values, owing a home isn&#039;t an instant road to &quot;The American Dream.&quot;

A majority of the population owning a home made sense when most people had stable jobs and lived in one place for most of their lives. Considering the financial situation of many Americans today, especially young people, renting makes far more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between mortgage payments, property taxes, repairs, maintenance, insurance, and fluctuating property values, owing a home isn&#8217;t an instant road to &#8220;The American Dream.&#8221;</p>
<p>A majority of the population owning a home made sense when most people had stable jobs and lived in one place for most of their lives. Considering the financial situation of many Americans today, especially young people, renting makes far more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Window Washer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241048</link>
		<dc:creator>The Window Washer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241048</guid>
		<description>Good post but by the end............ come on the data is there make a call.


&quot;Are we destined to become a nation of renters, particularly in light of the pain that’s been inflicted by the bursting of the housing bubble? What are the longer-term implications if such a shift is, in fact, taking place?&quot;

First long-term implication  started in Jan. &quot;savings/debt reduction&quot; blah blah blah ... went through the  roof but  how much of that was walking away from debt?

Trim tabs had some good data in Q1 &amp; 2 on this,  I haven&#039;t kept up on it but if you&#039;re going to post on funds flows fucking post on macro fund flows. You ended with household consolidation, which is sooooooo Q2 08 for any landlord with a brain.

You end your post with a list of questions that should have an, IMHO chart/ statement after each.


Let&#039;s rock!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is The Big Picture.

I keep an eye out for your post, 
Thank you for posting your thoughts.

 A few months ago the comments went pretty &quot;Yahoo message Board&quot;,  so I started talking shit in a hope that commenters would realize this blog has a higher standard shit-talkers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post but by the end&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; come on the data is there make a call.</p>
<p>&#8220;Are we destined to become a nation of renters, particularly in light of the pain that’s been inflicted by the bursting of the housing bubble? What are the longer-term implications if such a shift is, in fact, taking place?&#8221;</p>
<p>First long-term implication  started in Jan. &#8220;savings/debt reduction&#8221; blah blah blah &#8230; went through the  roof but  how much of that was walking away from debt?</p>
<p>Trim tabs had some good data in Q1 &amp; 2 on this,  I haven&#8217;t kept up on it but if you&#8217;re going to post on funds flows fucking post on macro fund flows. You ended with household consolidation, which is sooooooo Q2 08 for any landlord with a brain.</p>
<p>You end your post with a list of questions that should have an, IMHO chart/ statement after each.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s rock!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is The Big Picture.</p>
<p>I keep an eye out for your post,<br />
Thank you for posting your thoughts.</p>
<p> A few months ago the comments went pretty &#8220;Yahoo message Board&#8221;,  so I started talking shit in a hope that commenters would realize this blog has a higher standard shit-talkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akahn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241044</link>
		<dc:creator>akahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241044</guid>
		<description>Matt Taibbi has a great piece in Rolling Stone about how Obama&#039;s insider&#039;s are interested more in lining Wall Street pockets than solving the econ crises:  http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Taibbi has a great piece in Rolling Stone about how Obama&#8217;s insider&#8217;s are interested more in lining Wall Street pockets than solving the econ crises:  <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print" rel="nofollow">http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YY</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/feds-flow-of-funds-highlights-and-lowlights/comment-page-1/#comment-241043</link>
		<dc:creator>YY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45936#comment-241043</guid>
		<description>Home ownership was worthy as long as affordability existed (and this changed with easy credit). 
 The low equity suggests that in effect many home &quot;owners&quot; are renters in all but name, and the realistic ones should swallow their pride and enjoy the benefits of rent.

We need a further leg down in real-estate (in many cities, especially on the coasts) to drive down prices so mortgages are at most 25% of gross income, we have a way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Home ownership was worthy as long as affordability existed (and this changed with easy credit).<br />
 The low equity suggests that in effect many home &#8220;owners&#8221; are renters in all but name, and the realistic ones should swallow their pride and enjoy the benefits of rent.</p>
<p>We need a further leg down in real-estate (in many cities, especially on the coasts) to drive down prices so mortgages are at most 25% of gross income, we have a way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

