<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Zeitgeist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:29:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rj</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238748</link>
		<dc:creator>rj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238748</guid>
		<description>I think that comes off a bit harsh dean, swine flu and cash for clunkers would be worthwhile google searches for wanting to educate yourself about them. No argument on American Idol or paranormal activity, but people use the internet for entertainment, not to read financial blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that comes off a bit harsh dean, swine flu and cash for clunkers would be worthwhile google searches for wanting to educate yourself about them. No argument on American Idol or paranormal activity, but people use the internet for entertainment, not to read financial blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deanscamaro</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238743</link>
		<dc:creator>deanscamaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238743</guid>
		<description>The dumbing down of America comes through strong in these to four areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dumbing down of America comes through strong in these to four areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trip</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238619</link>
		<dc:creator>trip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238619</guid>
		<description>A free word search for &quot;unemployment&quot; on the City by City page yields:

City: popular search rank
Portland: 2nd most frequent
Minneapolis: 4th
Denver: 6th
LA: 9th
Seattle: 9th

I have no idea what that means, other than the search for benefits is greater in the West than the East?

http://www.google.com/intl/en_us/press/zeitgeist2009/cities.html

Methodology

To compile these local lists, we found the most popular searches for each selected city and then ranked them based on how unique they were to that city. A query is &quot;unique&quot; if it is disproportionately popular in a particular city compared to the rest of the country. This method explains why popular local searches (for example, for a specific movie theatre) may appear higher than a term for which people across the country are searching (for example, for a regional sports team).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A free word search for &#8220;unemployment&#8221; on the City by City page yields:</p>
<p>City: popular search rank<br />
Portland: 2nd most frequent<br />
Minneapolis: 4th<br />
Denver: 6th<br />
LA: 9th<br />
Seattle: 9th</p>
<p>I have no idea what that means, other than the search for benefits is greater in the West than the East?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en_us/press/zeitgeist2009/cities.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/intl/en_us/press/zeitgeist2009/cities.html</a></p>
<p>Methodology</p>
<p>To compile these local lists, we found the most popular searches for each selected city and then ranked them based on how unique they were to that city. A query is &#8220;unique&#8221; if it is disproportionately popular in a particular city compared to the rest of the country. This method explains why popular local searches (for example, for a specific movie theatre) may appear higher than a term for which people across the country are searching (for example, for a regional sports team).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZedThou</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238555</link>
		<dc:creator>ZedThou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238555</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure the &quot;paranormal activity&quot; search popularity has something to do with the horror film of the same name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the &#8220;paranormal activity&#8221; search popularity has something to do with the horror film of the same name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238547</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238547</guid>
		<description>Could someone explain the rise in paranormal activity?  I feel I must have missed something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone explain the rise in paranormal activity?  I feel I must have missed something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climategate</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238545</link>
		<dc:creator>Climategate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238545</guid>
		<description>Are you saying nobody searched for climategate?

&quot;Fuhrer, they found our plans...&quot;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwfNJC_SfVI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying nobody searched for climategate?</p>
<p>&#8220;Fuhrer, they found our plans&#8230;&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwfNJC_SfVI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwfNJC_SfVI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adult Franklin411</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238543</link>
		<dc:creator>Adult Franklin411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238543</guid>
		<description>I call BS.  Where is &quot;Erin Andrews video&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call BS.  Where is &#8220;Erin Andrews video&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogfish</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238537</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238537</guid>
		<description>Mannwich

Indeed.   The popularity of that show and all it&#039;s clones really does say it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mannwich</p>
<p>Indeed.   The popularity of that show and all it&#8217;s clones really does say it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bergsten</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238535</link>
		<dc:creator>bergsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238535</guid>
		<description>Nice &quot;y&quot; axis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8220;y&#8221; axis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/google-zeitgeist/comment-page-1/#comment-238528</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45115#comment-238528</guid>
		<description>I LOVE that American Idol is in the top four, and second for much of the year.  Says it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE that American Idol is in the top four, and second for much of the year.  Says it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

